Tag Archives: copyright

Ameren’s (AEE) CEO Warner Baxter Discusses Q2 2015 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

Ameren Corporation (NYSE: AEE ) Q2 2015 Earnings Conference Call July 31, 2015 10:00 ET Executives Doug Fischer – Senior Director, Investor Relations Warner Baxter – Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Marty Lyons – Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Analysts Brian Russo – Ladenburg Thalmann Glenn Pruitt – Wells Fargo David Paz – Wolfe Research Andy Levi – Avon Capital Kevin Fallon – SIR Capital Management Operator Greetings, and welcome to the Ameren Corporation Second Quarter 2015 Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Mr. Doug Fischer, Senior Director of Investor Relations for Ameren. Thank you, Mr. Fischer. You may now begin. Doug Fischer Thank you and good morning. I am Doug Fischer, Senior Director of Investor Relations for Ameren Corporation. On the call with me today are Warner Baxter, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and Marty Lyons, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, as well as other members of the Ameren management team. Before we begin, let me cover a few administrative details. This call is being broadcast live on the Internet and the webcast will be available for 1 year on our website at ameren.com. Further, this call contains time-sensitive data that is accurate only as of the date of today’s live broadcast and redistribution of this broadcast is prohibited. To assist with our call this morning, we have posted on our website a presentation that will be referenced by our speakers who may use terms or acronyms which are defined in the presentation. To access this presentation, please look in the Investors section of our website under Webcasts & Presentations and follow the appropriate link. Turning to Page 2 of the presentation, I need to inform you that comments made during this conference call may contain statements that are commonly referred to as forward-looking statements. Such statements include those about future expectations, beliefs, plans, strategies, objectives, events, conditions and financial performance. We caution you that various factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. For additional information concerning these factors, please read the forward-looking statements section in the news release we issued today and the forward-looking statements and risk factors sections in our filings with the SEC. Warner will begin this call with comments on second quarter financial results, full year 2015 earnings guidance and a business update. Marty will follow with a more detailed discussion of second quarter results and an update on financial and regulatory matters. We will then open the call for questions. Now, here is Warner who will start on Page 4 of the presentation. Warner Baxter Thanks, Doug. Good morning, everyone and thank you for joining us. Today, we announced second quarter 2015 core earnings of $0.58 per share compared with core earnings of $0.62 per share in last year’s second quarter. Results reported today, we remain on track to deliver solid earnings growth in 2015 and expect that 2015 core earnings to be in the range of $2.45 to $2.65 per share. Key drivers of our second quarter core earnings are listed on this page. I will highlight a couple of them and Marty will discuss each of these drivers later in the call. Consistent with our strategic plan, year-over-year earnings comparisons are benefiting from the significant investments we are making to better serve our customers. These incremental investments continue to be targeted towards our electric transmission and delivery businesses that operate on their formulaic ratemaking. However, in the second quarter of 2015 milder weather grow retail electric sales volumes and earnings lower than second quarter 2014 levels. Further, seasonal rate redesign and variances in the timing of revenue recognition and the formulaic ratemaking in Illinois also negatively affected the comparisons for the quarter and year-to-date periods, but these effects are expected to reverse over the remainder of the year. Our second quarter 2015 core earnings do exclude two unusual items. Those are results from discontinuing operations, primarily reflecting recognition of a tax benefit related to the favorable resolution of an uncertain tax position and a loss provision resulting from discontinuing the pursuit of a construction and operating license for a second nuclear unit in Ameren Missouri’s Callaway Energy Center. This relates to development costs incurred in 2008 and 2009 and is reflected in continuing operations. While we continue to believe nuclear power must be an important clean energy source for our company and country, as evidenced by the 20-year license extension we received this past March for our Callaway Energy Center, this loss provision was driven by recent changes in vendor support for licensing efforts at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, our assessment of long-term capacity needs, declining cost of alternative generation technologies and the regulatory framework in Missouri among other things. Again, Marty will discuss second quarter earnings in more detail in a few minutes. Turning now to Page 5, here we reiterate our strategic plan. We remain focused on executing this strategy and strongly believe that we will deliver superior long-term value to both our customers and shareholders. I would like to highlight some of our year-to-date efforts and accomplishments towards this end. These include our continued strategic allocation of significant amounts of capital to those businesses whose investments are supported by modern constructive regulatory frameworks, which provides fair, predictable and timely cost recovery and also deliver long-term benefits to our customers. This capital allocation is illustrated in the graphic on the right side of this slide. As you can see, we invested $556 million of our $846 million of capital expenditures for the first half of this year in jurisdictions with these modern constructive regulatory frameworks. This represents about 65% of our first half 2015 total capital expenditures and is an 11% increase over the amount invested in these jurisdictions during the first half of 2014. Approximately $300 million was invested in FERC-regulated electric transmission projects in the first half of this year driven by ongoing construction work on ATXI’s $1.4 billion Illinois Rivers transmission project. Construction is well underway on the first line segment with more than 80% of the 132 tower structures already erected. Completion of this segment is expected next year. Further, foundation construction is underway on two additional line segments, as well as 8 of 10 substations. In addition, I am pleased to note that in May, the Missouri Public Service Commission approved a certificate of convenience and necessity for the 7-mile Missouri portion for the Illinois Rivers project. Turning to ATXI’s Spoon River project in Northwestern Illinois, just last week, Illinois Commerce Commission Administrative Law Judges issued a proposed order recommending approval of a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity and we expect the ICC to issue an order later this year. We also have a pending request at the Missouri Public Service Commission for Certificate of Convenience and Necessity for the Mark Twain project in Northwestern Missouri and expect a decision early next year. All three of these transmission projects, Illinois Rivers, Spoon River and Mark Twain, are MISO-approved, multi-value projects. With regard to the cases pending at the FERC, challenging MISO’s base allowed ROE of 12.38% for transmission services, we and other MISO transmission owners continue to strongly advocate for an ROE level that is fair and that will continue to incentivize the transmission investment needed to ensure a robust grid for our nation. Marty will give you more details in a moment, but I would like to point out that first consideration of these cases is expected to extend into 2016 and 2017. Turning to Page 6 of our presentation, let me provide an update on the execution of our strategic plan at Ameren Illinois. We invested approximately $250 million in Illinois electric and natural gas delivery infrastructure project in the first half of this year, including those that are part of Ameren Illinois’ modernization action plan. This work, enabled by Illinois’ Energy Infrastructure Modernization Act is on track to meet or exceed its investments, the liability, advanced metering and job creation goals. Ameren Illinois customers are experiencing fewer and shorter power outages as a result of electric grid updates. System modernization program began in 2012 the installation of storm-resilient utility poles, automated switches and an upgraded distribution grid have resulted in 238,000 fewer annual electric service interruptions on average. And when customers do experience an outage, Ameren Illinois is restoring power 19% faster on average than in previous years. Further, installations of advanced electric meters were ahead of schedule. In 2015, Ameren Illinois plans to deploy 142,000 electric meters at customer locations in Central Illinois and Southern Illinois. Also more than 330 employees and an additional 1,000 contract workers have been hired to support investments in Ameren Illinois’ electric system and operations. As a result, we are on track to repeat our full time equivalent job creation commitment. All of these benefits are being driven by the forward thinking and constructive regulatory frameworks that support investment in Illinois. Of course, all of this progress requires timely recovery of our investments and constructive regulatory outcomes. We are clearly focused on achieving positive resolutions for our pending Illinois electric delivery from the rate update preceding and natural gas delivery rate case. While Marty will cover these cases in more detail a bit later, I will mention that earlier this week, Ameren Illinois, Illinois Commerce Commission staff, the Citizen’s Utility Board, and the Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers filed a stipulation and agreement on issues in our pending natural gas delivery case. This agreement includes a 9.6% ROE, among other things, which compares to the current allowed ROE of 9.08%. We look forward to the ICC’s decision in this case later this year. In Missouri our efforts are well underway to align operating and capital spending with the electric rate order we received in April as we pursue our goal of earning at/or close to our allowed ROE. We are leveraging ongoing enterprise-wide lean continuous improvement efforts with the natural attrition we are experiencing with our workforce, as well as aggressively pursuing additional cost reductions throughout our supply chain, among other things. And finally, we are continuing our relentless advocacy efforts of Missouri’s policymakers and key stakeholders. Our message is simple and straightforward. Modernizing the state’s regulatory framework is essential to support needed investments to upgrade the stat’s aging electric utility infrastructure in a timely manner and to create jobs. We remain convinced that such monetization will yield benefits similar to those that the State of Illinois is realizing today and is clearly in the best long-term interest of our customers and the economic vitality of Missouri as a whole. Moving to environmental matters, we await the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s final Clean Power Plan regulations, which are expected to be issued soon. In recent month, we have engaged an extensive discussions with industry leaders, state and federal regulatory and legislative leaders, including policymakers in the White House and the EPA and other stakeholders. In these discussions, we have aggressively advocated for constructive and responsible improvements to the EPA’s proposed plan. Those improvements include incorporating a better glide path to achieve the final 2030 targets, as well as protections to ensure that our nation’s grid is able to operate in a reliable fashion. And importantly, we are seeking to protect our customers from the significant lines and electricity costs, while at the same time making meaningful progress in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. While I can’t predict what will be in the final rules, I am hopeful that the collective advocacy efforts by Ameren and many other like-minded key stakeholders will result in meaningful improvements in the final Clean Power Plan issued by the EPA. In any event, should the EPA’s final rules require that we alter and accelerate our transition plans, we fully expect that required investments will be treated fairly by our regulators. And let me assure you that we are committed to transitioning to a cleaner, more fueled diverse generation portfolio in a responsible fashion. Recently, we announced plans for new solar facility west of St. Louis. The 13-megawatt Montgomery renewable energy center will be the largest investor-owned solar facility in the State of Missouri and three times the size of our O’Fallon solar facility, which went into service last December. The new facility is expected to be completed by the end of 2016. One last environmental update, last month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling on the EPA’s Mercury and Air Toxic Standards or MATS rule. In short, the Supreme Court determined that the DC Circuit Court of Appeals aired in deciding that the EPA was not required to consider costs when it developed the MATS rule. However, the Supreme Court decision did not vacate the rule. It remains in effect until a further decision by the DC Circuit Court of Appeals. This MATS rule is still in effect, there has been no change in our compliance strategy and we expect to fully comply with the rule before April of next year. A most significant capital project complied with this rule enhancing the electrostatic precipitators at the Labadie Energy Center which was completed last year. That project was included in our electric rates during our most recent rate case in Missouri. Turning now to Page 7 and our long-term growth outlook, in February of this year, we outlined our plan to grow rate base at a solid 6% compound annual rate over the 2014 through 2019 period. As the graphics on this page illustrates and aligned with our previously mentioned strategic plan, this growth is being driven by the allocation of significant amounts of capital, the FERC-regulated transmission and Illinois electric and natural gas delivery services. Such investments are supported by regulatory frameworks that provide fair, predictable and timely cost recovery and they deliver long-term benefits to our customers. Turning now to Page 8, in addition we have consistently stated that we have a strong pipeline of investments beyond those reflected on the previous page to meet our customers’ future electric and gas energy needs and expectations. To that end, in recent months, we have identified $500 million to $1 billion of potential investments in our Illinois electric and gas businesses, which would be incremental to those incorporated into the 2014 to 2019 rate base growth plan just mentioned. Such investments will be directed to the reconstruction and replacement of aging distribution system infrastructure such as lines, breakers, transformers and underground network facilities to sustain and improve reliability for our customers. Further, these investments include infrastructure capacity upgrades and additions in higher growth areas of the service territory. In Ameren Illinois’ natural gas delivery business, incremental capital would be directed to gas transmission line replacements associated with evolving pipeline safety regulations and aging distribution maintenance and service replacement project. Finally, in Ameren Illinois’ FERC-regulated electric transmission business, identified projects are primarily reliability related, including compliance with new NERC reliability standards and age-based replacements of equipment. We will evaluate these potential increment investments over the balance of this year as part of our now normal annual planning process. As Marty will discuss further, given the strength of our balance sheet and added confidence in the strength of our prospective cash flows, resulting from the recent IRS sign off on our 2013 tax return and associated tax assets, we believe we have the ability to fund the growth plans we announced in February, as well as these potential incremental investments without issuing any additional equity. Turning now to Page 9, in summary we have a strong long-term earnings growth outlook driven by above-peer average rate base growth that is focused on a transparent mix of utility infrastructure investments and jurisdictions with modern constructive rate-making that is formulaic, but uses a future test year. Earlier this year, we reiterated our expectations for compound annual growth of 7% to 10% and earnings per share from continuing operations over the period 2013 to 2018. As we said on our May earnings call, we plan to formally update our long-term earnings growth expectations on an annual basis consistent with our planning cycle. That said, the $500 million to $1 billion of additional investment opportunities I just described and our added conviction concerning the ability to finance our growth without issuing an additional equity, certainly bolstered my confidence in our ability to achieve earnings growth within those expectations. In addition to a superior earnings growth outlook, Ameren offers an attractive annualized dividend of $1.64 per share and a current yield of about 4.1%, which is also superior from our regulated peer average. We remain focused on delivering a solid dividend as we recognize its importance to our shareholders. Of course, any future dividend increases will be based on consideration of, among other things, earnings growth, cash flows and economic and other business conditions. In closing, we believe our shares offer very attractive total return potential for our investors. We are committed to executing the strategy I have discussed with you today and we continue to believe that will deliver superior long-term value to both our customers and our shareholders. Again, thank you for joining us on today’s call. And I will now turn the call over to Marty. Marty Lyons Thank you, Warner. Good morning, everyone. Turning now to Page 11 of our presentation, today we reported second quarter 2015 GAAP earnings of $0.61 per share, which matched second quarter 2014 GAAP earnings. Excluding results from discontinued operations and 2015 loss provision for discontinuing pursuit of a license for a second nuclear unit at Callaway, Ameren recorded second quarter 2015 core earnings of $0.58 per share compared with second quarter 2014 core earnings of $0.62 per share. Second quarter 2015 earnings from discontinued operations were $0.21 per share, primarily resulting from recognition of a tax benefit related to resolution of an uncertain tax position. This tax benefit reflects a settlement reached in June with the IRS, which resolved tax matters associated with the divestiture of our merchant-generation business. As Warner mentioned, with this settlement in hand we have even greater confidence in our ability to fund the growth plan we announced in February, as well as the potential incremental investments discussed without issuing any additional equity, including no issuances of equity through our dividend reinvestment and 401(k) plan. As of June 30, our combined tax benefits from net operating loss carry-forwards, tax credit carry-forwards and expected refunds stand at $643 million, including $454 million at the Ameren parent company level, which are expected to offset income tax liabilities into 2017. In addition to excluding discontinued operations, core earnings also excluded the previously mentioned Callaway license-related provision, which was $0.18 per share. Turning now to page 12, here we highlight factors that drove the $0.04 per share decline in second quarter 2015 core earnings compared to second quarter 2014 core earnings. Key factors included lower retail electric sales volumes, which reduced earnings by $0.04 per share. Milder early summer temperatures accounted for an estimated $0.03 per share of this decline with the balance due to energy efficiency, partially offset by revenue recovery authorized by the Missouri Public Service Commission under the state’s Energy Efficiency Investment Act. And lower Missouri industrial sales stemming primarily from a prolonged reduction in consumption by Ameren Missouri’s largest customer, Noranda Aluminum. Second quarter 2015 temperatures were near normal compared with the warmer than normal early summer temperatures experienced in the prior year period. We estimate that weather normalized kilowatt hour sales to residential and commercial customers in Illinois increased almost one half of 1% and in Missouri, they decreased about three quarters of 1%. As mentioned, in Missouri the negative earnings in fact have declined and electric sales volumes due to our energy efficiency programs is compensated for under provisions of the utilities energy efficiency plan. Excluding the estimated effects of these Missouri programs, we estimate that sales to residential and commercial customers would have also increased by almost one half of 1%. Kilowatt hour sales to Illinois and Missouri’s industrial customers decreased 3% and 4%, respectively reflecting lower sales to a large low-margin Illinois agricultural customer and the aforementioned lower sales to Noranda Aluminum. As noted on this page, the second quarter earnings comparison was also negatively affected by $0.02 per share by a seasonal rate redesigned and the timing of revenue recognition under formula ratemaking each related to Ameren Illinois electric delivery. These same factors reduced first half 2015 earnings by $0.04 per share compared to the prior year period, but we expect they will reverse by year end. In addition, the earnings contribution from electric transmission and delivery investments at ATXI and Ameren Illinois was reduced by $0.02 per share for the quarter and four spread cents per share for the first half because of lower recognized allowed ROEs. Transmission earnings for the year ago quarter reflected the current MISO-based allowed ROE of 12.38%. However, this quarter’s transmission earnings were reduced by a reserve to reflect the potential for a lower allowed ROE as a result of the pending complaint cases at the FERC. We began recognizing such reserves in the fourth quarter of last year. The net ROE recognized in our second quarter 2015 transmission earnings is comparable with the level incorporated into our first quarter 2015 earnings and the 2015 earnings guidance provided in February. Regarding second quarter 2015 Illinois electric delivery earnings, these incorporated an 8.75% allowed ROE compared with 9.4% in the year ago period. This decline was due to a decrease in the assumed annual average 30-year treasury rate from 3.6% to 2.95%. Of course, full year 2015 Illinois electric delivery earnings will incorporate the actual 2015 average 30-year treasury rate. Finally, depreciation and amortization expenses increased in jurisdictions not subject to formulaic ratemaking, negatively affecting earnings by approximately $0.01 per share. Moving to factors that had a favorable fact on the second quarter earnings comparison, increased investments in electric transmission and delivery infrastructure under formula ratemaking increased earnings by $0.04 per share compared with the year ago quarter and earnings benefited by $0.02 per share from a lower effective income tax rate, both of which I will discuss further on the next page. Turning then to Page 13, first I would like to remind you that we expect our 2015 core diluted earnings to be in a range of $2.45 to $2.65 per share. On this page, we list select items for you to consider as you update your earnings outlook for the remainder of the year. These include the effect on earnings that a return to normal temperatures would have on this year’s remaining quarters compared with those of last year. In particular, a return to normal weather in the third quarter would boost earnings by an estimated $0.09 per share compared to the mild year-ago quarter. Over the balance of this year, we also expect increased earnings from our FERC-regulated electric transmission and Illinois electric delivery services as we continue to make significant infrastructure investments under formula ratemaking. As I mentioned, we have been recording a reserve to reflect the potential for a lower FERC-allowed ROE since the fourth quarter of last year. The cumulative reserve recorded in that quarter was retroactive to November 12, 2013, the date the first MISO ROE complaint case was filed. The absence in the fourth quarter of this year of the prior period portion of the fourth quarter 2014 reserve is expected to benefit this year’s fourth quarter earnings comparison. Moving to a couple of factors that are anticipated to negatively affect the second half 2015 earnings comparison depreciation and amortization expenses are expected to increase for our businesses not operating under formula rates, and capitalized financing costs are expected to decline, reflecting a year-over-year decline in ongoing Ameren-Missouri capital projects. In 2014, a significant number of Ameren Missouri capital projects were in process and ultimately placed into service late in the year. Back on the positive side, earnings for the balance of the year are expected to benefit from a lower effective income tax rate. Our forecasted 2015 effective income tax rate is approximately 38%, a decrease from the 2014 effective rate which was approximately 39%. In addition, I want to remind you of additional factors that will affect the fourth quarter comparison. The absence of the Callaway Energy Center refueling and maintenance outage is expected to boost fourth quarter 2015 earnings by approximately $0.08 per share compared with the year-ago quarter. The next Callaway refueling is scheduled for the spring of 2016. Further, this year’s fourth quarter will reflect the absence of a 2014 benefit resulting from a regulatory decision authorizing Ameren Illinois to recover previously disallowed debt redemption costs of $0.03 per share. Of course, these are only some of the factors that will have an effect on balance of the year 2015 earnings as compared to 2014. Turning now to page 14, I will update you on select pending regulatory matters. Turning first to Illinois, in April Ameren Illinois made its required annual electric delivery rate update filing with the ICC. Under its formula ratemaking, Ameren Illinois is required to file annual rate updates to systematically adjust cash flows overtime for changes in cost of service and to true-up any prior period over or under-recovery of such costs. Our filings speaks of $110 million increase in net annual electric rates to reflect 2014 actual costs, expected 2015 infrastructure investments and prior period under-recoveries of costs. A summary of our filing is included in the appendix to this presentation. The ICC staff testimony filed in mid-July recommended a rate update that is just $3 million less than Ameren Illinois’ request. Interveners recommended rate updates that are $18 million to $19 million less than our request. As noted on this page, significant portions of these interveners’ adjustments relate to a position that the ICC has rejected in its past formula rate orders. An ICC decision is expected in December of this year with new rates effective early next year. Turning now to Page 15, we also have a natural gas delivery rate case pending in Illinois. In January of this year, we requested a rate increase based on a future test year ending in December 2016. As Warner mentioned, earlier this week Ameren Illinois, the Illinois Commerce Commission Staff, the Citizens Utility Board and the Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers filed a stipulation and agreement on issues in our pending natural gas delivery case. This agreement includes a 9.6% ROE, among other things. Our original rate request incorporated a 10.25% ROE while the staff had recommended a 9.31% ROE in their June testimony. For reference, the current allowed ROE for this business is 9.08% effective January of 2014. Our annual rate increase request is now approximately $45 million after incorporating the stipulation and agreement that I just mentioned. We estimate the ICC staff’s June testimony in this case adjusted for the stipulation supports an approximately $44 million rate increase. In addition to the parties to the stipulation, the Illinois Attorney General filed testimony in the case in June, which advocated a number of downward adjustments to our requested revenue requirement, most of them related to operating expenses. However, the Attorney General did not file ROE testimony. Our filing also included a proposal for a volume balancing adjustment for residential and small non-residential customers. This would ensure that changes in natural gas sales volumes do not resolve in an over or under-collection of natural gas revenues for these classes. And I am pleased to report that none of the parties to the case have opposed our request for this volume-balance adjustment mechanism. We expect the ICC to issue a decision by December with new rates effective by January of next year. A summary of this filing is also included an appendix to today’s presentation. Turning now to Page 16, I will update you on some regulatory matters pending at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. As previously mentioned, there are two pending complaint cases seeking to reduce the base-allowed ROE from MISO transmission owners, including Ameren Illinois and ATXI. The anticipated schedules for these cases are outlined on this page. In the first case, the ROE decision is expected to be based on market data for the six months ended February 11, 2015 and the schedule calls for an initial decision from an administrative law judge by the end of this November with a FERC final order expected sometime in 2016. In the second case, the ROE decision is expected to be based on market data for the six months ended December 31 of this year and the schedule calls for an initial decision from administrative law judge by the middle of next year with the FERC final order expected in 2017. Moving then to Page 17, in Missouri hearings were held last week for our proposed 2016 to 2018 Missouri energy efficiency plan. This plan would replace the current one, which has been in effect since 2013 and expires at the end of this year. The new plan would provide net customer benefits of $165 million over 20 years and reflects Ameren Missouri’s continued commitment to offering cost effective and realistically achievable energy efficiency programs for its customers. We expect the Missouri Public Service Commission decision early this fall and if approved the plan would be implemented beginning January 1, 2016. Finally, turning to Page 19, I will summarize our comments this morning. As Warner discussed, we continue to successfully execute our strategy. We delivered second quarter earnings that were solid and we expect our 2015 core diluted earnings per share to be in the range of $2.45 to $2.65 per share. In addition, we have a superior long-term earnings growth outlook driven by an above peer group average rate base growth plan that is focused on utility infrastructure investment in jurisdictions with modern constructive ratemaking. As Warner stated, earlier this year we reiterated our expectations for compound annual growth of 7% to 10% in earnings per share from continuing operations over the period 2013 through 2018 and we plan to formally update our long-term earnings growth expectations on an annual basis consistent with our planning cycles. That said, the $500 million to $1 billion of additional investment opportunities we discussed today and our added conviction concerning the ability to finance our growth through 2019 without the need for equity given the recent favorable settlement of our 2013 tax return, strong financial position and our outlook for cash flows certainly bolsters our confidence in our ability to achieve earnings growth within those expectations. When you couple our superior earnings growth outlook with Ameren’s dividend, which today provides investors with an above peer group average yield of approximately 4.1%, we believe our common stock presents a very attractive total return potential for investors. That concludes our prepared remarks. We now invite your questions. Question-and-Answer Session Operator [Operator Instructions] Our first question is from the line of Brian Russo with Ladenburg Thalmann. Please go ahead with your question. Brian Russo Hi, good morning. Warner Baxter Good morning Brian. Brian Russo The $0.5 billion to $1 billion of CapEx investment upside, when might we get an update on that and are there drivers or regulatory hurdles that you have to navigate through in order to feel comfortable increasing the existing CapEx budget? Warner Baxter Thanks for the question. I think really it’s going to be a matter of – we have talked before about our annual planning cycles and certainly wanted to provide greater clarity on some of the growth pipeline that we have been communicating about in the past. But we will be evaluating that potential CapEx over the remainder of the year, taking into consideration multiple factors, which is really about customer needs, balancing that with rate impacts, coordinating these projects and the timing of these projects with other projects that we have got ongoing over the next five years, making sure we have got the labor, vendor support, etcetera available to complete all those projects. So there are number of things that go into the assessment, but we would expect to complete that over the remainder of this year and certainly have included on the exact amount by the time we give guidance next February. Brian Russo Okay, great. And I would imagine that would be upside to the 6% rate base CAGR and correct me if I am wrong, but probably put you at the higher end of your EPS CAGR? Warner Baxter Well, we are certainly – as we have discussed on the call not updating our EPS CAGR. This added CapEx would certainly be incremental to the rate base growth that we have provided in the slide that we have. And as we mentioned on the call, certainly this added CapEx bolsters our confidence and our ability to achieve the earnings growth within the previously communicated expectations. Brian Russo Okay. And correct me if I am wrong, but you will not be paying cash taxes through 2016, is that accurate? Warner Baxter Yes. Through 2016, so as it stands right now, we will begin paying taxes again sometime in 2017. Brian Russo Okay, great. And then forgive me that I haven’t read through the gas stipulation yet, but what drove the higher ROE in this case versus your previously allowed ROE? Warner Baxter I can’t really recollect, going back to the last case the factors that got to that. But certainly here, we were successfully able to reach a compromise and accord with the other parties in the case. And the 9.6% is the outcome of those conversations and will be the ROE pending final decision by the IPC later this year. Brian Russo Just remind me that the previous gas rate case outcome was that stipulation or did that go to hearing? Warner Baxter No, it wasn’t. It went to hearings until that 9.08 from the final – for the previous case was the result of an ICC decision. Brian Russo Okay, great. Thank you very much. Operator Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question is coming from the line of Glenn Pruitt with Wells Fargo. Glenn Pruitt Hi, guys. Good morning. Warner Baxter Good morning, Glenn. Marty Lyons Good morning. Glenn Pruitt Just for clarification, your statement that there will be no equity needs, does that include DRIP type programs? Marty Lyons Yes, Glenn. Thanks. Yes, if we weren’t clear, that is correct. As we talked about on the call, we are able to reach a settlement of our 2013 tax return with the IRS, which not only gave us the ability to book the gain we booked in discontinued operations, but also it took away uncertainty relative to the overall tax benefit that we have at Ameren Corp., which we reiterated on the call today, was about $454 million of accumulated tax benefits at Ameren Corp. So, with that added certainty, as we look at the CapEx investment plans that we have got, as we look at our overall financial plans looking out over the next 5 years, we really don’t see the need for any equity, including from the DRIP and 401(k). Glenn Pruitt Okay, great. Thank you. Marty Lyons Thank you. Operator Thank you. At this time, there are no additional questions. I would like to turn the floor back to Mr. Fischer for concluding comments. Thank you. We have next question coming from the line of David Paz with Wolfe Research. Please go ahead with your question. David Paz Hey, good morning. Marty Lyons Good morning, David. Warner Baxter Good morning, David. David Paz Just on the incremental investment opportunities, could you just roughly breakdown at least as you see it today, how much of that would go toward FERC-regulated transmission? Marty Lyons Yes, sure. David, this is Marty again. That $500 million to $1 billion really breaks down about a third, a third, a third between Illinois Electric Distribution, Illinois Gas Distribution and Transmission, FERC-regulated transmission. David Paz Okay, great. And second question, in your 7% to 10% EPS target or outlook, do you – are you still assuming rising ROEs in Missouri and Illinois? Marty Lyons Yes, David. Sure. Just going back to the guidance we have given there, that growth has always been driven by the transparent rate base growth plans that we have got, the reduction of parent and other costs, monetization and reinvestment of the tax assets and certainly, the expectation of rising interest rates and ROEs over time. David Paz Okay. How about the assumed sales growth in that outlook? Marty Lyons The assumed sales growth in that outlook, David, has been about flattish as what our projection is really out through time. That’s about what we have been seeing this year, frankly, in terms of the overall sales growth when you take into considerations the energy efficiency programs that we have got. It’s about flat year-to-date and we expect residential and commercial sales this year again excluding the impacts of our energy efficiency programs in Missouri to be about flat. So, that’s the expectation embedded in those longer term plans. David Paz Great, thank you. Thank you so much. Warner Baxter Thanks, David. Operator Our next question – gentlemen, at this time, we have a question coming from the line of Joe [indiscernible] with Avon Capital. Please go ahead with your question. Andy Levi Hi, it’s Andy Levi from Avon. How are you guys doing? Warner Baxter Hey, Andy. Marty Lyons Andy, how are you? Andy Levi That was a really good rundown. Just want to make sure I heard it correctly, so literally no equity at all, DRIP, ESOP, anything through ‘19, is that what you said? Marty Lyons Yes, Andy. That is what we have said. Andy Levi Okay. So, whatever the share count is today that’s what it should be in 2019, is that correct? Marty Lyons That’s our expectation as we sit here today, Andy, yes. Andy Levi Okay, great, because I had built in a little bit. Okay, otherwise, I think everything else was pretty clear. When do you typically update your CapEx forecast and the $500 million to $1 billion or whatever else you may come up with, when could we possibly – will that be at EI or will that be next year? Marty Lyons Andy, as I said in response to a question a little while ago, we will continue to evaluate that over the remainder of this year. Most likely, I would say we would give an update in February. And if we have greater clarity to provide before that, we would do so. But as we go through our annual planning process, it generally lines up that we would be able to give a comprehensive update on CapEx and rate base growth plans in February. Andy Levi And I thought you and Warner gave a really good rundown today. So, good job. Warner Baxter Thanks, Andy. Marty Lyons Thank you, Andy. Operator Our next question is coming from the line of Kevin Fallon with SIR Capital Management. Please go ahead with your question. Kevin Fallon Hi. I am sorry if you already walked through this and I missed it, but on the incremental $500 million to $1 billion of CapEx, I thought you said it was like a third each among the different buckets you highlighted. Can you walk through the thresholds of what you need to do to get approval to do that? Will the – is it purely formula rates that you won’t need to get approval from the ICC or the FERC or will they have to sign off on the spending? Marty Lyons No, no real sign-off on the spending. I mean, if you go back after the call and read through the transcript, I think we gave some pretty good description of the types of projects that we are looking at, which in a lot of cases is replacement of aging infrastructure, putting new service in where needed based on certain changes in growth, in customer usage, as well as certain expenditures that we believe we are going to need to make to meet the safety code requirement and otherwise improve the safety and reliability of our system. So, all of these expenditures look like they are needed for customer service and don’t look to require any specific regulatory approvals. Kevin Fallon So, just to clarify there, it’s effectively, as long as you guys, you being Ameren deem that they are required and needed that it’s basically file and implement? Warner Baxter Yes, absolutely. And as I said earlier in response to a question obviously, we have to weigh all this with the timing of other projects we have got in our pipeline, make sure that we can execute these well for the benefit of our customers and certainly need to weigh these customer needs in these projects again with other projects in our system and with the rate impacts. Kevin Fallon Okay, that’s great. Thank you. Warner Baxter Thanks, Kevin. Operator [Operator Instructions] Thank you. At this time, I will turn the floor back to Mr. Fischer for closing comments. Doug Fischer Thank you for participating in this call. Let me remind you again that a replay of the call will be available for 1 year on our website. If you have questions, you may call the contacts listed on today’s release. Financial analyst inquiries should be directed to me, Doug Fischer. Media should call Joe Muehlenkamp. Our contact numbers are on today’s news release. Again, thank you for your interest in Ameren and have a great day. Operator Thank you. This concludes today’s teleconference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines at this time.

IDACORP’s (IDA) CEO Darrel Anderson on Q2 2015 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

IDACORP, Inc. (NYSE: IDA ) Q2 2015 Earnings Conference Call July 30, 2015 4:30 pm ET Executives Lawrence Spencer – Director of Investor Relations Darrel Anderson – President and Chief Executive Officer Steve Keen – Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Analysts Paul Ridzon – KeyBanc Ashar Khan – Visium Asset Management Brian Russo – Ladenburg Thalmann Operator Welcome to IDACORP’s Second Quarter 2015 Conference Call. Today’s call is being recorded and webcast live. A complete replay will be available from the end of the day for a period of 12 months on the company’s website at www.idacorpinc.com. [Operator Instructions] At this time, I’d like to turn the call over to IDACORP’s Director of Investor Relations, Mr. Lawrence Spencer. Please go ahead. Lawrence Spencer Thank you, Liz, and good afternoon everyone. As you’ve probably seen, we issued our earnings release and Form 10-Q before the markets opened today. They’re both posted to the IDACORP website. We will be using a few slides to supplement today’s call, and you can also find those on our website. We’ll refer to those slides as we work our way through today’s presentation. On today’s call we have Darrel Anderson, IDACORP’s President and Chief Executive Officer, and Steve Keen, IDACORP’s Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. We also have other individuals available to help answer your questions during the Q&A period. Before turning the presentation over to Steve, I’ll cover our Safe Harbor statement on Slide 3. Our presentation today will include forward-looking statements. While these forward-looking statements represent the current judgment or opinion of what the future holds, these statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from statements made today. So we caution you against placing undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Some of the factors and events that could cause future results to differ materially from those included in forward-looking statements are listed on Slide 3 and included in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which we encourage you to review. On Slide 4, we present our quarterly and year-to-date financial results. IDACORP’s second quarter 2015 earnings per diluted share were $1.31, an increase of $0.42 per share from last year’s second quarter. For the first six months of 2015, earnings per diluted share were $1.78, $0.35 greater than the same period in 2014. I’ll now turn it over to Steve to discuss the results in greater detail and review our 2015 key operating metrics. Steve Keen Thanks, Larry, and good afternoon everyone. On Slide 5 we show a reconciliation of earnings from second quarter 2014 to second quarter 2015. As you can see, net income over the period increased $21.6 million. This was largely due to improved retail sales volumes, the impact of the fixed cost adjusted or FCA methodology change and the tax benefit of an income tax deductible make-whole premium from Idaho Power’s recent first mortgage bond redemption. The heat wave in our service territory this June combined with dry spring weather resulted in recorded second quarter energy sales. The hot temperatures increased loads for air conditioning and the dry weather increased irrigation pump usage. As a result, operating income increased by $7.8 million. Changes to the FCA mechanism which were approved by the Idaho Public Utilities Commission in the second quarter were retroactive to January 01, 2015. Idaho Power recorded a $7.4 million benefit in the second quarter for the retroactive application of the FCA mechanism change to the first quarter. The calculations under the revised mechanism use sales associated with actual weather conditions as opposed to normalized weather condition under the prior mechanism. During this year’s second quarter, normal temperatures grow greater sales resulting in a $1.7 million decrease in FCA revenues compared to 2014. To help you understand the operation and potential future impact of the revised FCA mechanism which is now sensitive to weather conditions, we have included a discussion in the MD&A section of the 10-Q that we filed today. Customer growth increased revenues by $2.9 million as our customer account grew by 1.7%, also the $7.2 million decrease in income tax expense benefited this quarter’s earnings. As stated on our first quarter earnings release conference call, this resulted from the flow through tax benefit of the make-whole premium Idaho Power paid for the early redemption of first mortgage bonds originally due in 2018 but redeemed this quarter. The combination of these items resulted in a strong second quarter financial results we believe that positions the company well going into the second half of 2015. Moving now to slide 6, we show IDACORP’s operating cash flows for the first six months of 2015 and the comparable period in 2014 along with the liquidity positions at June 30. Cash flow from operations for this year’s first six months was $171 million, an increase of $8 million over the same period last year. Cash flows increased as a result of an $18 million increase in net income as well as from increased coal sales of Bridger coal company for the first six months of 2015, which resulted in a $6 million increase in distributed cash. Decreases in cash flow of $3 million occurred due to changes in deferred taxes and changes in taxes accrued and receivable and the remaining $10 million reduction in cash flows resulted from changes in working capital items such as unbilled revenues and prepaid expenses. IDACORP and Idaho Power currently have in place credit facilities of $125 million and $300 million respectively to meet short term liquidity and operating requirements. The liquidity available under the credit facilities is shown on the bottom of slide 6. Also, there are 3 million IDACORP common shares available for issuance under IDACORP’s continuous equity program. No shares were issued during the second quarter and we do not expect to issue new equity during the remainder of 2015 except for modest amounts relating to employee compensation plan. Turning now to slide 7, we continue to estimate 2015 O&M between $340 million and $350 million and we do not expect to amortize any additional accumulated deferred investment tax credits this year under the Idaho settlement stipulation. The 2015 capital expenditure range for Idaho Power remains between $300 million and $310 million. With the recent rainfall, we are tightening upward our projected hydro electric generation range from 5 million to 7 million megawatt hours up to a range of 6 million to 7 million megawatt hours. Finally, we are increasing our 2015 IDACORP earnings per share guidance range from $3.65 to $3.80 per diluted share up to the range of $3.75 to $3.90 per diluted share primarily to reflect the earnings drivers I mentioned earlier. The upper end of our guidance range is slightly above the 10% Idaho return on year end equity threshold and reflects the potential that Idaho Power could once again share benefits with Idaho customers under the current Idaho regulatory settlement stipulation, gets that level as it takes. I’ll now turn the presentation over to Darrel. Darrel Anderson Thanks, Steve, and good afternoon. I want to start today by acknowledging the passing of Idaho Public Utilities Commissioner, Mack Redford. As some of you may know, commissioner Redford passed away on June 30 unexpectedly. The Public Utilities Commission and the State of Idaho have lost an outstanding public servant. Commissioner Redford had served on the commission since 2007 and he was a skilled, fair and thoughtful arbiter from the bench. The Governor of Idaho C. L. Butch Otter announced today that Marsha Smith, a long-time Commissioner for the IPUC, will be re-appointed on an interim basis. In his announcement, he noted that her appointment will be effective immediately and will expire on January 15, 2016. At that time, a new commissioner will be appointed to replace her, pending Idaho Senate confirmation. Marsha Smith served as a Commissioner for 24 years before retiring last February. The two sitting commissioners both have a long history with the Idaho Commission and a deep background in utility issues. Commissioner Paul Kjellander has been a Commissioner since 2011 and previously was Commissioner from 1999 until 2007. Commissioner Kristine Raper served seven years as a Deputy Attorney General at the IPUC before her recent appointment. Now I’d like to move on to a discussion of topics related to the quarter. Last month, Idaho Power filed its 2015 Integrated Resource Plan, also known as the IRP. The preferred portfolio continues to include the addition of the 500 kilovolt Boardman to Hemingway or B to H transmission line which is proposed to run from the Hemingway substation near Melba, Idaho to Boardman, Oregon. The IRP provides for completion of B to H by 2025 which is a date based on a number of assumptions we include in the IRP prospects. We continue to advocate for and work towards an earlier in-service date for this critical resource as an earlier date has a number of benefits that might be lessened if the in-service date is delayed to 2025. Those benefits include increased reliability, mitigation of transmission constraint, environmental benefits from the import and export of renewable energy and lower permitting and construction costs and risk. Because of these benefits we are working for an in-service date as early as we can achieve. Additional components of the potential plan for 2025 and beyond are shown on slide eight, and include the possible early retirement of the North Valmy power plant in collaboration with the plant’s co-owner. Demand response programs, ice-based thermal energy storage and a new combined cycle natural gas plant. The IRP also considers the impact of anticipated power purchases from new solar projects. It is also fair to note that the IRP is a long-term planning tool completed every two years and near-term deviations from the assumptions in the plan could result in modifications to our resource needs. As you’ll see on slide nine, June’s very warm weather led us to near record fee customer demand. On June 30, Idaho Power System load reached 3,402 megawatts which is 5 megawatts short of the all-time record of 3,407 megawatts set in July 2013. It is interesting to note that the 2013 record was set at a time when we did not have any active demand response programs. This year, we had two demand response programs that were deployed on the peak demand day for a total of 67 megawatts. Without the programs deployed, we would have exceeded our all-time peak load level. Idaho Power continues to expect strong customer growth in the service area in the near-term and remains supportive of economic development initiatives aimed at sustainable levels of growth. During the first six months of 2015, Idaho Power’s customer count grew by over 4,500 customers and for the 12-month ended June 30, 2015 the customer growth rate was 1.7%. This is shown on slide 10. According to preliminary Idaho Department of Labor data for June 2015, total employment in the service area was more than 474,000 compared with around 460,000 at the end of last year, an increase of over 3% in the last six months. The unemployment rate for our service area was 3.9% compared to the June 2015 U.S. unemployment rate of 5.3% according to U.S. Department of Labor data. Another key economic indicator is expected growth in gross area product. Moody’s Analytics has stated that as of June 2015, the anticipated growth in gross area product for Idaho Power service area for 2015 and 2016 is 4.6% and 5.4% respectively. These are up from this year’s first quarter estimate of 3.2% and 3.8% of 2015 and 2016 respectively, representing an increase of over 40% in the estimated growth rate. Further evidence of our economic development potential is found in a six county region known as the Magic Valley located in the South Central Park of our Idaho service area. This area was selected as a top 12 U.S. manufacturing community under the investing and manufacturing communities partnership initiative sponsored by the U.S. Commerce Department. As a result of this federal designation, a number of significant benefits may be available to Southern Idaho including support from 11 federal agencies and more than $1 billion available in federal economic development assistance. Also this month, Idaho is recognized by Kiplinger as number three on the list of 10 states with the fastest job growth in 2015. We view all of these to be positive economic indicators in our service area that we expect will help drive load growth. Finally, I will touch on our weather outlook heading into fall as reflected on slide 11. For August through October, according to Nova, we are looking at a 33% to 40% chance of above normal precipitation and a 40% to 50% chance of above normal temperatures in much of our service area. And with that, I and others on the call will be happy to take your questions. Question-and-Answer Session Operator Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Paul Ridzon with KeyBanc. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Paul Ridzon Good afternoon, congratulations on the quarter. Darrel Anderson Thanks, Paul. Steve Keen Thanks, Paul. Darrel Anderson Appreciate that. Paul Ridzon Have you booked any provisions for refunds at this point or do you need to get through the quarter behind you? Steve Keen Paul, at this point, we have not booked any provision for sharing that’s what you mean as the sharing component and as we looked at it, as I said at the upper end of our range incorporate that possibility but it’s not sure enough that we booked anything. Looking at this quarter, weather certainly helped and with half the year left, we kind of need to see where that goes. Paul Ridzon How is still our weather? Steve Keen July has not been strong like June. I haven’t seen any reports on where it’s stacked up against normal but certainly it’s not a record month like June was. Darrel Anderson Paul, it’s been a bit of a roller coaster. We started out warm, we got cool and now it’s warm again. So cool, cool relatively speaking but we’re – I think we’re headed into triple digits here in the next couple of days, so we’re headed back into warming trend it looks like so — Paul Ridzon And always kind of surprised to see a little bit of a disparity between kind of the impact of the new FCA mechanism. You had a nice pickup from the first quarter but the impact on the second quarter wasn’t that meaningful relative, is it something symmetry or? Darrel Anderson Right. I would say that compulsive [ph] it was a little surprising to me at first. I asked the same question but as you look at it, first quarter there was much more impacts on the residential component of our revenues, second quarter affected residential again although obviously not as much as it did downward in the first quarter but some of our pickup came out of the irrigation side and irrigation is excluded from the FCA. It’s not included as a component and so that the upside there was not – didn’t get offset with any sort of an FCA reversal. Paul Ridzon Okay. That makes sense. Is this FCA mechanism applicable to commercial and industrial as well? Darrel Anderson No. It’s our commercial, it’s our residential on small commercial, so it applies to both. Paul Ridzon Okay. Thank you very much. Darrel Anderson Thanks, Bob. Operator Our next question comes from the line of Ashar Khan with Visium Asset Management. Your line is now open. Ashar Khan Good afternoon and congratulations on good quarter. Darrel Anderson Thanks, Ashar. Steve Keen Hi, Ashar. Ashar Khan Hi, how are you guys doing? Could you see minus as we getting to that part of the year on the dividend policy if you can just remind us what is the rate of change that you have indicated as we enter into that season? Darrel Anderson Sure. Thanks, Ashar. Thanks for that question. This is Darrel. So as we have stated previously, our target payout ratio is 50% to 60% of sustainable earnings. And so we will be taking out up with the board at the September meeting and what we have stated publicly is that we anticipate an increase of at least 5% from where we are at today. And so we will be taking this discussion up with the board in September with the expectation that we will update all of you once we have a decision on that. And I think what’s important there is we continuing to take a look at the 50% to 60% of sustainable earnings, and that we will look at when we review with the board. Obviously we are having a good year this year, we had some one-off items incorporated into this year. This year, I think you know how our mechanisms work with respect to the ADITC. Those numbers are all based on year end equity and so as our equity grows, which it’s growing as earnings grow then that potentially has an impact for future years. So we will take all of that into consideration when we look at what that dividend recommendation will be in September. Ashar Khan Okay. And can I just ask you this dividend, do you look at I’m assuming the way you described it. You will be looking at like ‘16 earnings? Is that right because the dividend increases like three quarters for next year and then the one quarter this year, is that a fair way to look at it? Darrel Anderson We will look at where we are at this year. We will also take a look at looking forward as to what earnings look like going forward combining with what cash flows would like. So all of that will be taken into consideration in coming up with the recommendation to the board. Ashar Khan Okay. Okay. I haven’t seen your Q, so I apologize but any change in CapEx for ’16 or ’17? Steve Keen There is no change at this point. We are in the middle of reviewing future CapEx right now. We don’t have any update provided externally but that’s what we do this time of the year as we roll through ’15. We are taking a hard look at ’16 and beyond. Ashar Khan Okay. Okay. Thank you so much. Darrel Anderson Thanks, Ashar. Steve Keen Thank you. Operator Our next question comes from the line of Brian Russo with Ladenburg Thalmann. Your line is now open. Brian Russo Good morning, I’m sorry, good afternoon. Darrel Anderson Hi, Brian. It’s probably a busy day for you, so it might still be morning. Brian Russo Just wanted to understand the increased guidance versus the original guidance. Obviously weather wasn’t the strong weather in the second quarter, it wasn’t included in the original guidance and I’m assuming that the make-whole redemption impact on tax, that was included in the guidance but was the FCA adjustment included in the original guidance. Darrel Anderson Brian, in the original guidance, it was not. We knew that there was potential for a change, but we didn’t know what that change would be or when it would be have implication. So it was not there. Brian Russo Okay. Darrel Anderson We are aware of things going on with it but it wasn’t final. They didn’t become final until second quarter. Brian Russo Right. And so was that just weather and the FCA combined, it seems like your guidance – you are increasing guidance, it should have been greater than what it was. But then I guess it’s probably because you then run into the sharing bands and then kind of caps the upside, is that the way to look at it? Darrel Anderson Yeah. The upper end, remember, our sharing mechanism this year is operating from the first dollar. 25% of the company retained, 75% goes back to customers. So it’s a pretty steep hill. We have to earn to keep one once you hit that threshold. And on the FCA, I do want to correct this. There was an FCA competition included but it was basically the old methodology. We did know if there would be a new methodology and if there was what it would be at that point of time. Brian Russo Right. Okay. And can you maybe talk about the scenarios or the mechanics of the FCA in the upcoming third quarter. Could it potentially have a meaningful impact? Steve Keen At the very highest level, what’s it going to tend to do is take a quarter where you have much higher usage and it’s going to moderate that a bit, pull you back down because it will look at that weather impact and give some of that back to customers. Quarter like the first quarter, if it’s very mild, you are not going to see all of what we used to see in terms of a negative impact. You will get the moderation back as the FCA fills that back in. What it’s doing is looking and saying, did you really get the amount of sales that were expected in order to get you that increment of fixed cost or the partner recovery that isn’t purely an energy sale then you would have otherwise been entitled to and it moderates. You could also look at it and say you got too much. You got a big quarter, lot of sales that you didn’t anticipate, it will take a little bit out. So it is really a moderating factor the way it’s designed right now. Darrel Anderson And Brian, just as a reminder in the classes that it covers which is residential and small commercial, and so variations in those classes will have an impact versus the industrials and the irrigation customer type. They will not have an impact. But as we go into third quarter obviously depending on the makeup of our sales between those classes also have an impact on what FCA might look like. Steve Keen Right. And just to add to Darrel’s comment, those two – the items that were excluded, the industrial and irrigation, they weren’t included in the old FCA either. It’s never been applied to them. That’s not new. Brian Russo Okay, good. And then just to understand the base case and the RFP, it seems like you can bridge the gap between now and when board men [ph] align, it is commercially available with energy efficiency and demand response. There is no need for new capacity or new generation. Steve Keen That’s right, Brian. I mean that’s the way this last round of the IRP set up is. We are sufficient and we don’t have a need really until 2025. Brian, you have to factor in and Darrel mentioned it in his comments that there are assumptions that go into that including the growth assumption. And if those deviate, then the plan will move away from what the IRP is projecting. One thing I know we’ve talked about with you before is our IRP used to include a large load component and add for potential large load, where current IRP does not. And those kind of factors if those things change, you just have to be ready to be nimble around what the IRP says. It’s designed as a document to lay the foundation and as you move past your point of projection into actual, you have to moderate based on what we really experience. So what happens in our service territory over the next couple of years could change what the next IRP might project. Darrel Anderson And Brian, I’m going to add, there is still also the wildcard of 111D. We don’t know – we think that’s coming out soon. We will have to assess that and how that impacts. What’s in our current IRP and so while we don’t have a lot of near term action plans with respect to what’s in the IRP, we will have a chance as we put a new plan together over the next two years to digest all of those variables and see kind of where we land. But as you know, there is a lot of moving pieces right now especially with 111D might not end up, so that could have an impact also. Brian Russo And just it looked like according to the Q, the tax rate was 15% in the second quarter. What’s the assumption built into your EPS guidance? Steve Keen Brian, if you pull the impact of the redemption, it’s isolated in this quarter. So if you go to note 2 and pull that number out, you will see that the effective rate jumps up back above 20% which is kind of where it was last quarter. It’s actually in and around that, so for the full year it’s going to be a number closer to that range. Brian Russo Okay. And then lastly, are there any other tax studies or triggers for gains or losses for the remainder of the year that we should be aware of? Steve Keen Right now, Brian, I don’t believe we have anything. I’m looking at [indiscernible]. We do have our normal – there is an annual process of filing returns, getting our – and we are very current in how we get reviewed by the IRS. There is typically – once you get your returns done, we will look at that and there could be some impact out of that in the third quarter but there is no change in direction or new type of deduction or loss of deduction that we are anticipating right now. It would just be the fact that what actually happen might be slightly different than what got filed in the return as you get a reconcile with the IRS, but that’s the only thing I am aware of, now typically third quarter. Brian Russo Alright. Thank you very much. Steve Keen Thanks, Brian. Operator [Operator Instructions] That concludes the question-and-answer session for today. Mr. Anderson, I’ll turn the conference back to you. Darrel Anderson We know that you all had a fairly busy day. I think there is a lot of you had stacked up calls, so we appreciate you guys taking the time, participating in our call this afternoon. We appreciate your continued interest in our company and look forward to talk to you guys in the future. Thanks a lot. Operator That concludes today’s conference. Thank you for your participation. Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS. If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: transcripts@seekingalpha.com . Thank you!

California Water Service Group’s (CWT) CEO Martin Kropelnicki on Q2 2015 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

California Water Service Group (NYSE: CWT ) Q2 2015 Earnings Conference Call July 30, 2015 07:30 ET Executives Thomas Smegal – VP & CFO Martin Kropelnicki – President & CEO Paul Townsley – VP, Regulatory Matters Analysts Spencer Joyce – Hilliard Lyons Jonathan Reeder – Wells Fargo Operator Welcome to the California Water Service Group Second Quarter 2015 Earnings Results Teleconference. Today call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the meeting over to Mr. Thomas Smegal, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead, sir. Thomas Smegal Thank you, Kim. Welcome everyone to the second quarter earnings call for California Water Service Group. With me today is Martin Kropelnicki, our President and CEO and Paul Townsley, our Vice President of Regulatory Matters. A replay of today’s proceedings will be available beginning today July 30, 2015 through September 30, 2015, at 1-888-203-1112 or at 1-719-457-0820, with a replay passcode of 1770876. Before looking at this quarter’s results, we would like to take a few moments to cover forward-looking statements. During the course of the call, the company may make certain forward-looking statements. Because these statements deal with future events, they are subject to various risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from the company’s current expectations. Because of this, the company strongly advices all current shareholders, as well as interested parties to carefully read and understand the company’s disclosures on risks and uncertainties found in our Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and other reports filed from time-to-time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Now, let’s look at the quarterly results. I’m going to go through the income statement and then turn it over to Paul for an update on our regulatory activity for the quarter. So for the second quarter our financial results, our revenue was a 144.4 million that’s down 8.8% or 14 million and that’s two things going on there, the MCBA, the modified cost balancing account which tracks our production cost that’s reflected an entry of 6.7 million and then unbuilt revenue adjustment which we will talk about in a little bit more detail later reduced revenue by 10 million and those both result really from decreased consumption in the quarter and at the end of the quarter. Our production cost for the quarter 53.0 million that’s down 14.4%, 8.9 million and again that water production volume is down 21% for the quarter. So we see that conservation is having effect on our production cost. Our production mix, well production within the quarter was 52% of total water production, while purchased water represented 45% and surface water accounted for the remaining 3%. In 2014 in the same quarter, 51% of water production was from wells, 46% from purchase sources and 3% was surface water. Our administrative and general expenses for the quarter were up 11.9% or 2.8 million and that’s really driven by pension expenses which were higher by 2.6 million. For our other operations expense, that was 17.5 million for the quarter up 9.4% or 1.5 million. Conservation expense increased to 0.5 million and expenses recorded to the drought memorandum account for future recovery was 0.9 million during the quarter and just as a reminder in our past calls we are confirming that the company still expects to spend $4 million to $6 million on drought response this year and Marty will talk more about our drought response. And maintenance, we got 5.3 million for the quarter up 6.8% or 0.3 million driven by maintenance in services maintenance within the quarter. Depreciation and amortization was 15.4 million, a decrease of 4.6% that’s driven as it was last quarter by lower depreciation rates that were adopted with the DRC [ph] decision late in 2014. Our net other income was a loss for the quarter of $15,000 that’s down about 800,000 from the second quarter of 2014 and the biggest driver there is a change in the value of the company’s non-qualified benefit plans which are mark to market each quarter. For income taxes during the quarter they decreased 2.1 million to 5.1 million and that’s due primarily to a decrease in pretax income and partially offset by changes in tax benefits. During the second quarter of 2014 the company has realized tax benefit of 2.5 million associated with implementation of the tangible property regulations. No similar benefit was achieved in the second quarter of 2015. Consequently the effective tax rate for 2015 is estimated to be 38%. So our net income for the quarter was 9.8 million, compared to net income of 17.2 million in the same period last year for a decrease of 7.3 million and talk about two main factors there of course is the unbuilt revenue and the tax benefit that we had received in the prior year. Earnings per share $0.21 and earnings per share on a fully diluted basis for the quarter is compared to earnings per share of $0.36 in the second quarter of 2014. Please go through the year-to-date results, revenue 266.4 million for the year down 1% or 2.5 m. Production costs are down 8.5% or 9.1 million over the first six months and that is reflecting of course decrease in volume. Our production mix was 51% for the first six months was well production as compared to 49% in the first six months of 2014 and purchased water decreased from 48% to 46%. This reflects a scarcity of surface water during the drought and more pumping from our groundwater wells. Our administrative and general expenses for the first six months of the year were up 11% or 5.4 million again that’s pension expense which was 5 million of 5.4 million. Other operations, 33.4 million for the year up 3% for 1 million and that’s to be driven primarily by wages. Maintenance expense is 9.8 million for the year to-date down 2.1% or 200,000. So there is a decrease in well and pumping equipment maintenance for the year-to-date. So net income for the first six months of the year 11.4 million, that’s down 2.3% or 300,000. The earnings per share is $0.24 on a fully diluted basis for 2015 and that’s the same $0.24 as we achieved in the first six months of 2014. So now I would like to turn it over Paul for an update on regulatory activity during the quarter. Paul Townsley Thank you, Tom. Good morning everybody. I would like to provide you with an update on our regulatory activity in both California and our subsidiaries. Let me start with Hawaii, our subsidiary Hawaii Water Service Company received three decisions from the Hawaii Public Utilities Commission during the second quarter of this year. These three decisions will provide the company with an additional revenue of $2 million annually. The three decisions conclude general rate cases for our Waikoloa Water Company, the Waikoloa Sewer Company and the [indiscernible] water Service Company, all of which are located on the Big Island of Hawaii. In addition to revenue increases to offset changes in operating expenses and to provide a return on our invested capital, these decisions also authorize the company to establish power cost pass through mechanisms so that energy cost are shown directly on customer’s bills and cost saves are pass through rather than eroding range [ph]. These three decisions conclude a series of Hawaii Water Service Company rate cases that is being working their way through the regulatory process since 2011 and 2012. Our net rate cases in Hawaii are for our Maui based, [indiscernible] service areas which we plan to file early next year. In California we filed our 2015 general rate case application in early July of this year. The application was covered of three year forward looking period request California Public Utility commission approval to increase revenue by $94.8 million in 2017, $23 million in 2018 and $22.6 million in 2019. The application also requests commission approval for Cal Water to invest $693 million in capital over the three year period of 2016 through 2018. The main driver for the requested revenue increase in this rate case application is investment and infrastructure. About 80% of the requested revenue increase in the rate case is attributable to capital investment and of the $693 million in requested capital investment over 40% or about $280 million of it is because of our stepping up of our pipeline replacement program. By stepping up our pipeline replacement program we can ensure that we’re replacing older pipeline in a systematic and timely manner which will reduce failure and leakage rates over the long term and the balance of the capital request that we have made to the commission is for other types of normal utility investments wells, pumps, tanks, treatment plants and water meters and service lines and technology, the usual bread and butter of our water utility investments. The rate case filing also reflects Cal Water’s aggressive cost control measures which include reduced benefit costs and increasing employee head count for all positions except for those that are required and make water supply improvements. We also want to point out some other important elements of the rate case application. In this case we’re proposing to consolidate a number of our service areas, our application details proposals to combine for rate making purposes 16 of our service areas in the five regions. We believe that proposed consolidation will help with a customer affordability concerns and also improve administrative efficiency. We have also requested that the commission continued the company’s sales reconciliation mechanism also known as SRM that was approved in our last rate case and to further enhance it to make it better reflect annual changes in customer sales. And finally we’re proposing to improve construction work and progress also known as [indiscernible] in rate base rather than including capitalized interest in our project announced. This last change will make Cal Water’s approach to construction accounting more consistent with other California Public Utility commission regulated water companies. The commission has not yet established a schedule for our rate case. However in accordance with the commissions established rate case plan new rates should go into effect on January 1, 2017. That’s my update, Tom. I will give it back to you. Thomas Smegal Thanks, Paul. Now I would like to cover some highlights on the balance sheet. So our plant balance at the end of the period net utility plant grew to 1.64 billion as of June 30 of 2015. The work in progress as Paul was talking about, construction work in progress increased to a 135 million. Our capital investments from both company funded and developer funded activities were 75.8 million on a year-to-date basis, it’s a 32% increase from the same time in 2014. This increase is primarily driven by increased activity on projects approved in the 2012 California General rate case application which went into effect last year. And as we have mentioned earlier the company expects to spend between a 125 million and a 145 million on company funded improvements in 2015, so we’re well on our way to meeting our target goals there. Cash on hand was 24.5 million. We did have a 126.6 million outstanding on our revolving credit facilities as of June 30th. I wanted to talk a little bit about our accrued unbilled accounts receivable what we call unbilled revenue and because that was the main driver of the change in earnings for the period. Unbilled revenue accrual represents water which has been used but not built for at the end of the period. The unbilled revenue is not reflected in the RAM decoupling mechanism which is recorded on a cash basis. Once built of course the revenue is recorded in the RAM and it flows through the normal decoupling process. The accrual we do this every quarter and it is very seasonally and very with REIT changes typically as in 2014 the accrual is higher at the end of the second quarter as compared to the end of first quarter. This year we asked our customers to conserve 25% to 30% state wide and they really came through as Marty will talk about in the discussion of the drought, our customers in June conserve 30% based upon their usage in 2013. With that consumption our unbilled revenue accrual is down as compared to 2014 and that’s what’s really driving the change in earnings this year. This has the seasonal effect, this is a transitory effect. We’re going to be doing this accrual every quarter and it’s just a natural part of us doing it. And of course the company cannot predict the future effects on net income due unbilled revenue accruals but we will see how it goes throughout the rest of the year. And just a final update from me on the balance sheet net RAM and MCBA balance actually decreased 0.3 million during the quarter to 47.9 million from 48.2 million at the end of the first quarter. The balance is up 2.7 million for the year from 45.2 million at the year-end. So now I’m going to turn it over to Marty for some comments on the drought and the quarter’s results. Martin Kropelnicki Thanks, Tom. Good morning everyone. If we sound like we’re a little off because Tom and I are in Boston after our board meeting yesterday we flew out east and we will be meeting with investors in Boston today to talk about the rate case we just filed. So it’s really early in the morning our time and we struggled to find Tom coffee this morning and me a cold diet coke but we got the first shot. I think we’re warming up here. So I want to cover really five things, one talk a little bit about the operating results for the quarter. Two, spend most of my time giving you kind of detailed drought update and what’s being going over the last really 60 days in the State of California. Three, give some thoughts on the GRC and highlight some of the things in what we’re doing that Paul talked about. Four, talk about the [indiscernible] workplace which we won for the fourth year in a row and then lastly talk about our plans as we move into the second half of the year what are our priorities as we move into the last part of the year and one of our goals for the company. So first and foremost, as Tom mentioned we saw significant decline in demand, our consumption laid in the quarter. So if you remember, Jerry Brown, Governor of California signed the executive order by extending the Emergency Drought Declaration in April that was ultimately put into place about May end of the first week in May and then we had to ramp up to be in compliance with that role start in June 1st. So it’s interesting that we did see the consumption prior that declaration being extended if you recall the medium wasn’t very good and in most places the consumption was down anywhere from 0% to 7% and that was really driven by the fact we had a very long dry winter. So people continue to use water. Once we did the public participation meetings, we communicated the drought plans. We sort of implemented our customer first approach. It shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone that we saw a significant decrease in consumption that really hit in the month of June and Tom kind of hit the bad news with that and it does affect the revenue accrual which is outside the regulatory accounting mechanism. That’s a good news in that and that most of our districts hitting or exceeding the conservation targets, what are the major step from where they were 60 days ago. So while that’s create a little bit of short term volatility the fact that is it’s step in the right direction for the company being able to hit it’s required targets as prescribed by that emergency declaration by the governor. Tom, you might want to take a quick minute if you can just to go through kind of the surcharge accounting and now that we’re into the penalty phase where people are charged a surcharged regarding their allocation how their accounting is going to work for that, because they will start showing us really in the Q3 numbers. Thomas Smegal Sure, Marty. The commission adopted our what’s called schedule 14.1 which is our drought plan and our drought water budget plan. In it there is two types of monetary penalties, one is a surcharge on excessive use over the budget that the customer has, each of our customers is given a specific budget that’s based upon their past usage in 2013 in the similar period. That surcharge money that comes is going to be put in the RAM of decoupling account, so that goes offset the deficit that might occur in the RAM with reduced sales. So that’s something that are going to be looking at very carefully to see where that goes. There are also penalties that would be associated with customers that misuse water or use water against the rules that have been established by ourselves, by the state and by local ordinances such as washing their car at an inappropriate time or watering at an inappropriate time or wasting water down the side walk. Those penalties, those fines really will be put into the drought memorandum account. That drought memorandum account I mentioned has we recorded 900,000 for the quarter and as we go forward that will be collected on a future basis so that’s drought memorandum account, it’s not something that we will recover immediately it will be something we recover probably in 2017. Martin Kropelnicki Right, so the end build revenue versus the ramp kind of creates a timing difference and the ramp balances for the quarter really went down actually slightly from where they were at the beginning of the year, so now you will start, we believe we believe you will start to see as the RAM balances start to grow as we move into the summer month and it’s kind of the change in consumption is being recorded now in June. It will start moving through the regulatory accounts going forward. As Tom we spent about a $1 million incrementally on our drought response and we’re still stand at the 4 million to 6 million is about the right amount. About 40 people dedicated full time in our drought centers working in each of our regions and through a dedicated call center to assist our customers and help high volume users in each of our districts. In addition on the numbers for the quarter, the 75.8 million and the capital program that the company has recorded that’s really good news. So we’re actually ahead of plan on a year-to-date basis, our goal is a 125 million to 145 million the significance in why I’m pushing this number and I want to highlight this number a little bit is because of the rate case numbers that Paul mentioned. We [indiscernible] $700 million of new capital and that is a significant increase what we asked for in the last rate case, the largest components of that being made and then pumps treatment, water supply, water [indiscernible] items. So this is kind of a transition here in terms of our ability to execute a $200 million year capital program. So we have been very focused internally looking at our capital processes and making sure we have the ability to implement a significantly larger capital program in the coming years and as we said before we don’t see the capital slowing down as Tom and I have mentioned before, you know our mains are getting older. We need to start changing out those mains. Obviously water supply and scarcity is playing in the California so we have a lot of projects to bring new water supply on board and also make sure as the water level has dropped in California while the quality issues become more difficult to deal with. So we’re dealing — we’re spending more money on purification for our programs. By the way we know that it’s very complicated on the RAM accounting and all everything gets involved in it. So when we look to our 10Q there will be a lot of disclosure around this and we try to highlight the changes in the MD&A so people can really follow in our 10Q that we plan to file shortly. Now moving on to the drought, so bad news is out of the way, the decline in consumption now let’s stick to the good news and that’s really the customers and our footprint within the State of California has done an outstanding job at the first month of required mandatory conservation. To give you an idea how our districts faired, we had six districts that achieved greater than a 40% reduction, and the water consumption we had 15 districts that achieved greater than 30% reduction and 19 out of our 24 districts were in compliance that means 80% of our districts were in compliance. The ones that were out of compliance most of them was the exception of one district which I will come back were a stone throw away from hitting the targets. So that’s first month of reporting that’s required and the penalties are rolling in, I’ve been very, very happy with the drought response and our customers’ ability to hit their conservation target. Call center volumes have leveled off from a higher 45,000 calls per week down to approximately 20,000 calls per week and in total we have received approximately 4000 customer applications for appeals are requesting changes to their water budget. If you put that into perspective of how many meters we have in the State of California that’s less than 1% of their customers are coming back saying they need a little bit more out of their water budget. So we have an approved approximately 1600 applications and adjusted water budget and those are remodeled or we just had twins or my in-laws has just moved in with me and so we go and we verify all that and we will adjust their water budgets based on the supporting documentation that’s put in. But nonetheless, it’s less than 1% of the customers coming and asking for a change in the water budget and to me it speaks the fact that the message of the drought in what we need to do is really clearly being understood by our customers. In addition towards the end of the quarter we did a few customer focused groups, and the feedback has been mainly positive. What we try to do is get customers in a room and ask them what’s working, what’s not working, what is it going to take them to help conserve and overall it’s been a very supportive environment with the customers and the communities that we serve. In addition to the focus groups about 82% of the media coverage in our service areas has been neutral to positive versus 18% which is negative and again we believe that’s reinforces, that’s the message is getting out and it fits nicely with decline that we have seen in consumption at our customers understand that we need to hit these targets. [Indiscernible] supply standpoint our water supply conditions have been steady and we’re in the process of launching five new conservation programs that will bring us upto 12 conservation programs that have been launched over the last 60 days, the new programs will drive our outreach and continued success, and allow us to continue to target high end users, high volume users and the water that they use. In addition, we started rolling out a new report. This new report was traded with an application called BEACON. We have partnered Badger Meter to design and build an application to produce easy to read graphical reports for customers to help them track and understand their water usage compared to people in their neighborhood so it doesn’t identify who your neighbors are but it’s basically a graphical report that we produced and give to the customers, that shows their trends and how they are trending compared to people in their neighborhood. And so that was a good project that we partnered with Badger Meter and we’re in the process that we’re rolling it out. We’re rolling it out to the high volume districts first and then we will roll out to the districts that aren’t as hard hit with the drought, what the idea that is being fully rolled out here during the third quarter. So overall I’m very pleased with the progress that we have made on the drought, I think we’re off to an outstanding start, it has been a lot of work for the team but all this indications are heading in the right way. Customer usage is down, customer understanding is up, media coverage has been good and we’re hitting our targets and I think that’s the most important story here. In addition as Paul mentioned you know the rate case, the rate case we’re moving into the next stage so it’s being filed. We start our tours with the regulators here in next month and we start notifying our customers. I believe this week with build notifications of the rate case process. We get what’s called an exception report from the — we file a prelim rate case and then give us a deficiency report and then we have to correct those deficiencies before make the final filing. Our deficiencies in this rate case were down about 65% from where they were with the last rate case, I think that speaks to the companies extra care and timing is put into preparing this rate case, in particular the capital work and the capital program across the state. So as we move into the rate case space here and continue to deal with the drought those are our two priorities as we go into the end of the year. Droughts number one, rate cases number two. Lastly I want to take a couple of minutes to talk about the award we announced a couple of weeks ago, the Bay Area Top 100 Workplace so this effects our employees in the Bay Area which is about — it’s about 25% to 35% of the company. For the fourth year in a row we have been named a Top 100 Workplace in the Bay Area and once again we’re the only utility to win this award and we take great pride in being an 89 year old water utility located in the heart of Silicon Valley competing with 1000 of tech companies that are around us. It’s nice to be a winner and I believe that the award shows the type of company that we’re, the type of employees that we have and I sincerely believe that happy employees help create good customer service and that good customer service also helps [indiscernible] response. So we’re very happy to have won that award for the fourth year in a row. We did take a small moment to have lunch with the employees to celebrate their success and it was back to our come back to dealing with the drought. So in closing while the drought is creating a little bit of volatility on the unbuild of revenue side which is outside the regulatory mechanism, the fact is there is a lot of great things are happening in Cal Water. We’re off to a great start with the drought and we’re hitting our targets and really because we’re in the emergency declaration, it’s about doing the right thing right now and dealing with the short term volatility and so I’m very pleased to where we ended the quarter in terms of the products with drought and think we’re off to a great start. So, Tom with that I will turn it back to you. Thomas Smegal Okay, great Marty and Kim that is the end of our presentation and we’re happy to take questions. Question-and-Answer Session Operator [Operator Instructions]. Our first question is from Spencer Joyce from Hilliard Lyons. Spencer Joyce Couple of quick ones for me here, first I think you briefly touched on, did you say the CapEx spend so far this year has been about 75 million? Thomas Smegal Yes 75.8 million so almost 76 million. Spencer Joyce Okay, so we’re over half way to kind of the full year goal here. Thomas Smegal Spencer that does include a little bit of developer contributions so that’s not all what we call company funded CapEx and when we’re targeting we’re targeting the company funded CapEx. So we’re right about half way there little bit better than half of our goal right now. Spencer Joyce In any case tracking well may be at least if we think about last year where we kind of undershot a little bit. Thomas Smegal I think Spencer, one think to look at is the company funded over the last 12 rolling last 12 months, half of last year we really accelerated and then this has continued that trend. So I think that shows a good track record of what we can spend in the future. Spencer Joyce Separately with the drought kind of dominating the conversations here over the last year or two, I want to ask about acquisition potential. Has the drought or any other external factors perhaps brought any potential targets kind of to the forefront or have any opportunities maybe percolated on that front? Martin Kropelnicki What’s the drought done, I think is really highlighted kind of some of the weakness in the State of California around the long term planning for water supply and Spencer you’re right, NAWC Financial forum I shared with the people of the financial forum what the population growth curve was for California versus kind of the water supply and the demand curve and the supply curve are growing apart right now, they are not going together which is highlighting a lot of need for a lot of capital infrastructure both for new water supply but also upgrading existing water supply and that’s start with the state and goes all the way through to companies like us. So [indiscernible] covers a lot of stones and when that babbling brook [ph] goes down you start to see the rocks that usually lie under the water. So we’ve seen some of the rocks, just some of the weakness in the system right now. Having said that, our water supply has been fine that we have a few cities that were trucking water to help get them through the summer months because they have just run-out of supply. I also mentioned at the conference that none of the investor-owned utilities have run out of water, it’s been more a small kind of undercapitalized city or meeting systems have been the ones that have been strained and run out of water. So it hasn’t popped into any type of M&A market, in California it’s hard to buy a muni system because it requires a vote of the local taxpayers to approve it but clearly you’re seeing the stress on the smaller systems and the inability to meet water quality standards or add adequate supply for their customers. So I think the jury is still out on that. I think part of it’s going to depend on what happens over the next 12 to 18 months, it’s drought, if it continues. I will say it’s fascinating to me that we are focused on California but Oregon declared a drought here in the month of June, Washington declared a drought in I believe it was late April, early May and I was recently talking to somebody who is from Vancouver, British Columbia who was telling me how horrible the drought conditions are in Vancouver. In fact their water restrictions are worse than ours. So the drought is really a whole west coast item right now and I think it’s going to be changing some behaviors and changing how capital is directed within the state and whether that leads more M&A I think the jury is still out on that. Spencer Joyce So it sounds like maybe nothing eminent but at least you guys are kind of keeping your ear to the ground there. One final, one from here. I know if we think back to last year Q3 was a pretty strong quarter, Q3 ’14 that is as we recouped a little bit of benefit via the rate case or the generate rate case that may have been otherwise earned during the first half of 2014. Correct me if I’m wrong there first off and then second if you could, what is roughly the kind of net revenue benefit that might come out of Q3 this year in order to maybe get a more fair comp looking at Q3. Thomas Smegal I would have to go back to our communications in Q3 of last year and unfortunately don’t have that open in front of me. We did recognize the benefit of the rate case and the interim rates associated with the rate case in the third quarter but I think that was fully disclosed in the press release so that number is pretty quantifiable. As far as on a go forward basis I think you would look to that adjustment to get to your comp. As far as the rate changes and the way to think about our the profitability of the company from last year to this year we have identified that we had step, what’s called the escalation step increases of about 5 million, a little less than 5 million. We did at the beginning of July, get approval from the CPUC on $5 million revenue requirement worth of these [indiscernible] letter capital projects that they have been approved in the prior rate cases, this all on an annual revenue basis and of course what’s going on in Hawaii we will start to see in August the revenue coming in from those rate changes that we got at the end of June. And so those are just some of the things that are going on and obviously the drought response is another factor that we have identified it could be a change as we go forward. Operator [Operator Instructions]. We will move on to Jonathan Reeder from Wells Fargo. Jonathan Reeder Couple of questions, first on the revenue, since this will essentially get captured by the RAM in Q3 it’s about $0.30 headwind for Q2, should we view that as something that’s just going to reverse and add $0.13 of incremental earnings in Q3? Thomas Smegal Jonathan, I think that this is the line on the balance sheet, you can go back and then anybody can pick this up out of the Qs and the Ks. We see a variability in the accrued revenue, from anywhere from 15 million to 30 million at the end of every quarter. Right now we are at — I think it’s 26 million, at the end of the year last year we were 23 million so this is a very small increment. If you follow that, it’s really — it’s kind of a sea level change or it’s the tide going in and out. If it happens that in the third quarter we get that popped in and what we mean by that not that it’s going to up higher but that is not going to fall like it fell in the third quarter in the prior year. So always going to vary, it varies a lot less the second quarter because of the conservation whether it comes back to a normal level at the end of year. I think it’s dependent upon a couple of factors both the customer conservation, the effect of the surcharges that will be calculated in the end bill and also the effect of the rate design that we have seen over the last couple of quarters where more service charge revenue less quantity charge revenue. So it will come back it’s a question of timing really, will it come back in the third quarter, fourth quarter when the droughts over-rise I can’t say at this point. Martin Kropelnicki Yes I think it was interesting to know Jonathan that typically in the second quarter we see a really big step in that number and in this quarter we see that down because of the consumption, that consumption really had in June and that’s what it relates on that calculation as the 21 day average of what people consumer. So it — when you flipping in the context of what the swing was that we typically see this time the year, it’s a pretty big swing. Jonathan Reeder And then on the mark to market life insurance in Q2, what was the absolute like benefit or loss, I mean you said it was 800,000 quarter to quarter. Thomas Smegal So the loss in that area was about 200,000 so that’s made the rest of that category includes benefits from other unregulated activities. Jonathan Reeder So anything else that we should be thinking about in terms of ongoing earnings number for you all in Q2? Thomas Smegal No just the things that we mention the drivers on the rate changes that are going to hit in Q3 from Hawaii and from the rate base offsets. Martin Kropelnicki Yes. And again when the Q comes out you will see in the rate section we have that identifying what those increases were both the escalation in steps and the Hawaii changes and for this quarter John it really comes down to those three items, the changes and the end build revenue, the non-recurring tax credit and now I’m blank on the third item because it’s early but it’s really the [indiscernible] that we talked about, those are called out in the press release and also in the Q that will be filed. Operator [Operator Instructions]. And it appears there are no further questions today. Gentlemen I will turn the conference back over to you. Thomas Smegal Great. Well I want to thank all of you for your continued interest in California water service group and we look forward to talking with you again after the third quarter. Thanks. Operator And that does conclude our conference today. Thank you all for your participation.