Tag Archives: climate-change

Entergy Corp. Reports Solid Cash Flows From Operations

Summary This utility with a 5.14% dividend yield deserve a closer look. The decline in natural gas prices has led to a droop in wholesale electricity prices, harming Entergy’s profits. We use the company’s trailing 12 month P/E to get a better price comparison with industry peers. Regularly generating cash profits is an essential component of successful businesses. It only makes sense that’s how many investors wish to see their investments perform as well: as cash machines. Shark Tank investor “Mr. Wonderful” Kevin O’Leary agrees, emphatically stating, “cash is king.” And dividend payers like Entergy Corporation (NYSE: ETR ) churn that stuff out. The utility sector has recently crashed, with many companies trading at or near 52-week lows. Choosing the strongest companies from the lot is a fantastic opportunity to lock in great long-term deals on serious cash machines. Entergy Corp. trades at $66.69 per share, near its 52-week low of $61.27. Their dividend yield is a juicy 5.16% at this price level. During the third quarter, Jim Simons’ hedge fund increased their holdings in this company by 1.02 million shares – that means his research team concluded the company is trading at a discount to its intrinsic value. A clear indication that Entergy is worthy of further investigation. Entergy Corporation serves the growing suburban markets of Texas and operates in Arkansas, Mississippi, and Louisiana. They also distribute natural gas which is becoming more commonly looked upon as a commodity of growing importance in man’s fight against climate change, even as natural gas producers themselves are not presently thriving due to vast oversupply. The company is off of its 1-year high by 27.5% as the utility sector has generally gotten whacked by the market since February of this year. Financial Results & Removing A Big Non-Cash, One-time Impairment Charge Focusing on their operations, the company has announced the shut down of two loss-making power plants. The impairment write-offs and writedowns associated with the closure of the Pilgrim and FitzPatrick nuclear power plants took third quarter results to a net loss of $4.04 per share. I’d like to get closer to the Price-to-Earnings figure without this one-time charge baked in. After we removed the one-time charge we can easily compare the per share price ratios of Entergy Corp with its industry peers. First we’ll take a look at what third quarter 2015 results look like with and without the unusually high impairment charges, then we are going to bake-in Other Income, Interest Expense, and Income Taxes to arrive at an earnings figure that is comparable to industry peers. Note: The company’s 2012, 2013, and 2014 annual reports indicate asset impairment charges of ($ in millions) $255,524, $241,537, and $179,752, respectively. We will use the average of these three annual figures, divided by 4, to estimate the typical impairment charges per quarter. This will allow us to take a view of the profitability of the company aside from the plant write-offs associated with management’s work to improve operations. The average of the indicated impairments for 2012, 2013, and 2014 is $225,604. Divided by 4, that’s $56,401 of average quarterly impairments — the figure used in the image below. Time to review operating expenses with and without the recent quarter’s decommissioning related impairments: Taking another step closer to an industry-comparable earnings per share figure we’ll add in Other Incomes of $43,179 and subtract the quarter’s Interest Expense of $171,349. Our income before income taxes comes to $492,617. On Entergy’s very profitable 2014 they paid 38% tax on the aforementioned figure. Taking income taxes into account for the quarter we come to our net-of-decommissioning write-off 3rd quarter net earnings figure: $305,423. Finally, we will now find our remapped, industry peer comparable earnings per share and price-to-earnings figures for the 179,151,832 common stock shares outstanding: Retuned 3rd Quarter 2015 Earnings Per Share of $1.70 I selected Southern Company and FirstEnergy Corp. as they are among those enjoying profitability and similar dividend yields. Other peers in the energy utility sector include NRG Yield, Inc. (NYSE: NYLD ), Calpine Corp. (NYSE: CPN ), The AES Corporation (NYSE: AES ), and American Electric Power Co., Inc. (NYSE: AEP ). Entergy’s retuned Trailing P/E of 12.24 compares favorably to larger and slightly larger peers Southern Company (NYSE: SO ) and FirstEnergy Corp. (NYSE: FE ). Entergy enjoys a higher dividend yield and a competitive price-to-sales ratio with its market capitalization neighbor First Energy. Another favorable indicator is the firm’s Price-to-Sales ratio below the average of its peers. Cash Flow from Operating Activities Cash flows from operating activities, net of nuclear fuel purchases and resale, and net of financing costs, bring us to 3rd Quarter cash earnings of $329,628,000. This figure far exceeds their quarterly common stock dividend of $.85 per share, or approximately $154,038,000 inclusive of preferred dividends. It appears that the company can reliably generate enough cash to pay its dividends. Marketplace Interest in Entergy Corporation When a hedge fund with a small army of highly-qualified analysts and access to 3rd party consultants at costs of hundreds of thousands of dollars takes interest in a company by executing significant buy orders, I get interested too. Now, there’s no way to know the exact reasons for the following recent purchases I will outline below but you can be generally assured that these guy’s goal is to make money in a long position through the receipt of dividends and capital appreciation. As mentioned earlier in this article, Jim Simons’ hedge fund added 1.02 million shares of Entergy Corp during the second half of this year. That’s a 70% increase in the size of their position in the company, bringing Jim Simons’ funds’ total position to 2.47 million shares. Millennium Management increased their position by $54 million during the most recent quarter. They own 1,525,275 shares with a value of $99 million. Buying by Hedge Funds far exceeded selling during the second half of the year reported as of September 30th, which is a bullish indicator of smart money sentiment. Conclusion I like Entergy Corp.’s at its yield of 5% and greater. They serve a diverse geography from Texas, to Louisiana, Arkansas, and New York, among other locales. Their earnings figures are solid aside from the one-time decommissioning charge associated with the closure of money-losing nuclear power plants in Plymouth, MA and the FitzPatrick plant of New York State. The Plymouth plant closure is expected to be complete during the first half of 2019 and FitzPatrick’s closure during early 2017 at the latest. Most of the company’s production of electricity is by nuclear power plant. Their profitability has suffered with the collapse in the price of natural gas because it has brought down the wholesale price of electricity in their markets. In general, Entergy’s free cash flow should easily support its quarterly dividend for a long time coming. Utilities such as these folks are the classic example of long-term cash machines. Due to my belief that the marketplace has generally underappreciate Entergy’s ability to reliably pay its dividend, tempered by a reluctance to catch a falling knife where we don’t know whether or not natural gas prices will continue to drag on electricity prices, I rate Entergy Corporation a hold. If natural gas — hence wholesale electricity prices — start climbing again and all else stays the same, Entergy Corporation becomes a clear and even a screaming buy. Click +Follow next to my username to get the latest research beamed to your inbox in realtime Additional disclosure: This article represents the opinion of the author as of the date of this article. This article is based upon information reasonably available to the author and obtained from public sources that the author believes are reliable. However, the author does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this article. It is merely the author’s interpretation of the information contained in the article. The author may close his investment position at any point in time without providing notice. The author encourages all readers to do their own due diligence. This is not a recommendation to buy or sell a security

Fight Global Warming With These ETFs

Establishing a terror-free world may be the foremost agenda at the international level now, but the global warming issue is equally heated. While so long it was presumed that global warming leads to climate change, causing rising sea levels, drought in one region and flood in other, the latest theory is that this monster can ” cause job losses, recessions and even a tumbling stock market”, according to economists. So, one can easily understand the urgency of controlling pollution and cooling down the globe. In that vein, global leaders assembled in Paris at the COP 21 meet – which is the 21st annual conference of parties – to chalk out an elaborate and comprehensive plan for lowering carbon emissions and moderating the warming of the planet. Efforts to arrest global warming have been constant across individual countries. Now, not only developed economies, but the emerging ones too are pushing themselves to attain this goal. China intends to build a pollution-free environment. As part of this mission, the president of China and U.S. president Barack Obama have recently struck a deal to lessen carbon emissions. The agreement calls for carbon emission reductions by 26% to 28% in the U.S. by 2025. It also includes the first-ever commitment by China to stop emissions from growing by 2030. Notably, China and America are two largest emitters of greenhouse gases . President Obama has always been active in the cause of cleaning up carbon pollution. A proposed Environmental Protection Agency rule seeks to reduce 30% carbon emission from power plants by 2030 from the levels emitted in 2005. At the conference, the Russian president noted that his country has not only averted the rise of greenhouse emissions, but has actually slowed it. Russia targets to curb 70% of greenhouse emissions by 2030 from the levels seen in 1990. At the Paris meet that is under way, global superpowers will also decide on supporting underprivileged countries like Bangladesh and Indonesia to finance the needed reforms they can’t pay for. Investors can also make outsized profits from this awareness on global warming. Several clean energy and low-carbon ETFs have been rolled out to capitalize on the growing need for environment protection and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Below, we highlight a few ETF options that investors can go “green” with. SPDR MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (NYSEARCA: LOWC ) This has become an $87.6 million ETF within just a year of its launch. The 1,277-stock ETF looks to track the stocks from developed and emerging markets that discharge lower carbons. The fund charges only 20 bps in fees. Here too, Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ) (1.9%) takes the top spot, followed by Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT ) (1.17%) and General Electric (NYSE: GE ) (0.85%). The fund is heavy on the U.S., which has half of its total exposure, while Japan (7.9%) and the U.K. (7.1%) take the next two spots. LOWC is down about 0.9% so far this year (as of November 30, 2015). iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (NYSEARCA: CRBN ) The 931-stock fund also charges 20 bps in fees a year from investors. The fund has amassed over $217 million in assets since its debut in December 2014. Its exposure is quite similar to LOWC, as Apple (1.92%), Microsoft (1.17%) and General Electric (0.82%) are the top three holdings. The fund’s geographic exposure is also pretty much like that of LOWC. Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (NYSEARCA: ETHO ) This new ETF has a 400-stock portfolio having a carbon emissions profile that is 50-70% lower per dollar invested than a conventional broad-based benchmark. The index studies total greenhouse gas emissions from over 5,000 equities to choose “climate leaders” in each industry. No stock accounts for more than 0.56% of the basket. Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX ), M&T Bank Corp. (NYSE: MTB ) and Energy Recovery Inc. (NASDAQ: ERII ) are the top three holdings of the fund, which charges 75 bps in fees. Original Post