Tag Archives: china

Protecting Yourself Against The Next Bond Liquidity Crunch

By DailyAlts Staff Anyone who lived through it knows that liquidity evaporated during the 2008-09 financial crisis. In response, the U.S. federal governments imposed a series of rules and regulations designed to make financial markets safer, but instead, they’ve contributed to even more illiquidity. What can investors do about it? That’s the question explored in Alliance Bernstein’s September 2015 white paper Playing with Fire: The Bond Liquidity Crunch and What To Do About It . Trading Turnover is Down The bond market has long been considered a safe haven during times of financial stress. Historically, well-capitalized banks have stood at the ready, willing to buy bonds – particularly investment-grade and government issues – when no other buyers were interested. But due to regulatory changes, banks are hamstrung from providing this service, and as a result, turnover in both investment-grade and high-yield bonds has plummeted since the financial crisis. Increased Correlation It’s not that demand is down: New bonds are being issued in record numbers, and investors are willing to buy. The problem is that during so-called “fire-sale” selloffs – when stocks, bonds, and commodities suffer sharp declines – bond-market liquidity is drying up, and thus sellers under duress must contend with wide bid/ask spreads and lower selling prices than they bargained for. And, as a result of the policies of the Federal Reserve and other central banks, these broad selloffs are becoming more and more common. The Impact of Central Banks In the wake of the financial crisis, when liquidity dried up, central banks began forcing down interest rates by buying government bonds and other assets, thereby expanding the money supply and flooding the markets with liquidity. Their bond buys pushed interest rates down and forced yield-minded investors into riskier assets. In addition to the U.S. Federal Reserve, the U.K.’s Bank of England, the EU’s European Central Bank, the Bank of Japan, and the People’s Bank of China have all massively expanded their balance sheets since 2009. Crowded Trades With lower rates on government bonds, stocks and other riskier assets become more attractive by comparison. While 0% interest rates may have made sense as an “emergency” policy measure, nearly ten years later, rates are still pegged near zero, but it appears things are likely to begin normalizing later this year, or in early 2016. It’s widely acknowledged that the Fed and other central banks have boosted bonds and other asset prices, so the reversal of their policies is likely to have the same effect – indeed, even the Fed’s threat of scaling back its “quantitative easing” bond-buying program in 2013 led to a “fire-sale” dubbed the Taper Tantrum. The risk in 2015 and into 2016 is that yield-starved investors have crowded into too many of the same trades, and that without banks standing on guard to buy during the next “fire-sale” selloff, there may be no takers (at reasonable prices), and thus a severe liquidity crunch. What to Do About It? So what can investors do about it? AllianceBernstein’s Head of Fixed Income Douglas Peebles and Head of Global Credit Ashish Shah, authors of the white paper, provide the following list: Diversify using a broad multi-sector strategy; Be a contrarian and avoid the crowd; Keep cash handy – and don’t neglect derivatives; Do your credit homework – and expand your investment horizon; and Consider select investments in private credit. Investors should vet asset managers as part of their “credit homework.” Peebles and Shah recommend asking managers questions to gauge their acumen, such as “To what do you attribute the decline in liquidity?” and “How has your process changed as liquidity has dried up?” In closing, the authors ask investors to remember: While the financial crisis did considerable damage to markets and investors, those who kept their cool – and who didn’t rely too much on liquidity – made a lot of money. For more information, download a pdf copy of the white paper .

Utilities Funds In Focus If Fed Delays Rate Hike

All eyes are now on the two-day FOMC policy meeting that gets underway today. The importance of this particular meeting has surged ever since hopes started surging of the Fed lifting the key interest rates in the September meeting. Nonetheless, expectations of a September rate hike have started fading as uncertainty took over in recent days. Today, let’s look at funds in focus if the Fed does not announce a rate hike. During the July meeting, the Fed had not provided any clue about the timing of the rate hike, but had somehow left the door open for a September hike. Nonetheless, many new events have changed the financial world scenario since the last Federal Open Market Committee meeting that was held in July. Subdued inflation is a worry, though labor data has been encouraging. But the latest batch of economic data has not really clarified if the Fed can raise rates. Meanwhile, China, the second largest economy, has consistently reported dismal economic data of late; sparking global economic slowdown fears that led to global market sell-offs. Moreover, what is causing much of the uncertainty is market volatility. Rate Hike Uncertainty Moving beyond the economic data, a strong reason for not hiking the rate is market volatility. It may not be easy for the Fed to raise rates amid such a volatile market. In fact, the Fed has never raised the key Federal funds rate when the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) has been above 25 in the last 20 years. The average level of VIX has been just 15.7 when rates have gone up. This is even lower than the long-run average of 20. VIX is “a key measure of market expectations of near-term volatility conveyed by S&P 500 stock index option prices.” What is worse for investors is that volatility is predicted to continue for some more time. According to the Wells Fargo Advantage Funds chief portfolio strategist Brian Jacobsen, volatility may continue for three to four months. China, one of the primary reasons for the market rout, cannot assure less volatility. Recently, in China, a measure of 50-day volatility had increased to its highest point in 18 years. While a 0.25% rate hike cannot be ruled out completely, recent comments and other events have also come in to suggest otherwise. While traders of short-term interest rate futures are giving a one-in-four chance of a rate hike, primary dealers or economists from banks dealing directly with the Fed have picked December to have a higher chance of the rate hike coming in. Conflicting data points also have intensified the uncertainty. As said, the inconclusiveness is prominent. Opinion Polls Go Against Rate Hike According to The Wall Street Journal , 46% of economists surveyed last week forecasted a rate hike in the September 16-17 meeting, while the majority of them expects a rate hike later this year. The tally fell sharply from an early August poll that saw 82% of economists supporting a rate hike in September. A Bloomberg calculation shows that chances of a rate hike in September have dropped to 30% now. At the start of August, it was at 54%. Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs also forecasts a rate hike in December. Volatile markets and inflation data falling short of expectations strengthened their conviction that a September rate hike is too early. Additionally, the Bankrate Economic Indicator survey shows that China’s currency devaluation leading to a massive sell-off in stocks will compel the Fed to stay on hold with its liftoff this month. Funds in Focus on No Rate Hike The Fed seems to be stuck between global central bank easing and dollar strengthening, deflationary pressures arising from the energy sector and troubles in the global economy. Whether lifting the monetary policy stimulus would be a prudent move is the question that the Fed needs to answer. Going by the chance of the Fed not hiking interest rates now, Utilities funds are the natural choice to buy. Utilities is one of the most rate-sensitive sectors due to its high level of debt volume. Utilities are capital-intensive businesses, and the funds generated from internal sources are not always sufficient for meeting their requirements. As a result, the companies have to approach the capital markets for raising funds. As a result, a movement in interest rate has a significant impact on this sector. The capital-intensive Utilities industry needs to access external sources of funds to expand its operations. The low interest rate environment, which has, for some time, been near a zero level, has been extremely conducive for its growth. A continued low interest rate environment would thus be favorable for Utilities funds. However, the problem with many Utilities funds is that they are in the negative territory considering the year-to-date return. This does not, however, mean that they do not have the potential to gain going forward. With a high yield, some Utilities funds may be on investors’ radar. If the Fed decides against a rate hike now, investors may even buy these funds at a discounted price. Carrying a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 (Strong Buy) , American Century Utilities Fund Investor (MUTF: BULIX ) has high yield of 3.19%. Its portfolio is constructed based on quantitative and qualitative management techniques. Though it is down year to date, the fund comes at a discount and should be a good pick for income-seeking investors. Its 3-year and 5-year annualized returns are 7.1% and 9.9%, respectively. Its annual expense ratio of just 0.67%, as compared to the industry average of 1.18%, also makes BULIX an inexpensive fund to add to the portfolio. Franklin Utilities Fund A (MUTF: FKUTX ) has an yield of 2.79%. It seeks capital growth and current income over the long run. The fund invests a large chunk of its assets in Utilities companies that are involved in providing electricity, natural gas, water, and communications services. The 3-year and 5-year annualized returns are 7.5% and 10.4%, respectively. Its annual expense ratio of 0.75% is also lower than the category average of 1.18%. FKUTX currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #2 (Buy) . Another fund with a decent yield is Invesco Dividend Income Fund Inst (MUTF: IAUYX ). A large chunk of the assets of IAUYX is invested in dividend-paying securities and other instruments having similar economic characteristics. IAUYX has a dividend yield of 2.18%. The fund’s annual expense ratio of 0.87% is lower than the category average of 1.10%. Original Post

ETF Deathwatch For September 2015: 13 Members Recently Died

Seventeen new names joined ETF Deathwatch this month, but the overall membership roll dropped by five as 13 members died and nine left due to improved health. The current count stands at 325 (233 ETFs and 92 ETNs). The number of actively-managed funds on the list declined from 41 to 39. All newly-launched products are granted an exclusion from ETF Deathwatch for the first six months of their life. This gives them an opportunity to attract investor interest either in the form of sufficient assets to achieve profitability or enough trading activity to spur asset growth in future months. For September, the 149 new products launched between March 1 and August 31 are excluded. This leaves 1,619 eligible ETFs and ETNs. From a percentage viewpoint, ETFs have lower representation on Deathwatch than ETNs. Within the ETF classification, passively-managed funds are currently faring better than actively-managed ones. The overall ETF representation comes in at 16.3% of the eligible funds, with 14.8% of the 1,307 eligible passively-managed funds and 32.0% of the 122 eligible actively managed ETFs on the list. Even though the quantity of listed ETNs has shrunk by more than 10% this year, nearly half of their remaining population is on Deathwatch. For September, 48.4% of the 190 eligible ETNs are on the list. Day traders have been migrating from 2X to 3X leveraged ETFs to get the biggest bang for their buck. As a result, 2X funds are falling out of favor, and four more of them were added to ETF Deathwatch this month. Six of the other September additions are from sponsors with little or no name recognition among retail ETF investors. ETFs from Arrow, EGShares, GreenHaven, KraneShares, Lattice, and Sit are new members. BlackRock closed 18 of its iShares ETFs in August. Twelve of these closed ETFs make up the bulk of the ETFs that came off of Deathwatch this month. Perhaps what is more interesting is the fact that six of the iShares ETF closures were not on Deathwatch. For example, iShares FTSE China (NASDAQ: FCHI ) had more than $37 million in assets and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Eastern Europe (NYSEARCA: ESR ) had nearly $31 million, keeping them both off the list. The current criteria for ETF Deathwatch states that funds with more than $25 million in assets are automatically removed from the list. So far this year, eleven products with more than $25 million in assets have closed. It may be time to raise that threshold. The average asset level of products on ETF Deathwatch held steady at $6.8 million, and the quantity of products with less than $2 million also remained constant at 62. The average age increased from 49.7 to 50.1 months, and the number of products more than five years old was unchanged at 110. Here is the Complete List of 325 Products on ETF Deathwatch for September 2015 compiled using the objective ETF Deathwatch Criteria. The 17 ETPs added to ETF Deathwatch for September: Arrow QVM Equity Factor (NYSEARCA: QVM ) Direxion Daily Basic Materials Bull 3x (NYSEARCA: MATL ) EGShares Brazil Infrastructure (NYSEARCA: BRXX ) ETRACS CMCI Silver TR ETN (NYSEARCA: USV ) GreenHaven Coal Fund (NYSEARCA: TONS ) Guggenheim S&P High Income Infrastructure (NYSEARCA: GHII ) iPath US Treasury Flattener ETN (NASDAQ: FLAT ) KraneShares FTSE Emerging Markets Plus (BATS: KEMP ) Lattice Emerging Markets Strategy (NYSEARCA: ROAM ) ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers (NYSEARCA: SMDV ) ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats (NYSEARCA: REGL ) ProShares Ultra Gold Miners (NYSEARCA: GDXX ) ProShares Ultra Junior Miners (NYSEARCA: GDJJ ) ProShares UltraShort Gold Miners (NYSEARCA: GDXS ) ProShares UltraShort Junior Miners (NYSEARCA: GDJS ) RevenueShares Global Growth Fund (NYSEARCA: RGRO ) Sit Rising Rate ETF (NYSEARCA: RISE ) The 9 ETPs removed from ETF Deathwatch due to improved health: Columbia Large Cap Growth (NYSEARCA: RPX ) PowerShares KBW Capital Markets (NYSEARCA: KBWC ) PowerShares KBW Insurance (NYSEARCA: KBWI ) ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (NYSEARCA: YXI ) ProShares Ultra S&P Regional Banking (NYSEARCA: KRU ) ProShares UltraShort Technology (NYSEARCA: REW ) QuantShares U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta (NYSEARCA: BTAL ) SPDR BofA Merrill Lynch Emerging Markets Corp Bond (NYSEARCA: EMCD ) SPDR S&P International Consumer Discretionary (NYSEARCA: IPD ) The 13 ETPs removed from ETF Deathwatch due to delisting: AdvisorShares Accuvest Global Long Short (NYSEARCA: AGLS ) iShares Asia Developed Real Estate (NASDAQ: IFAS ) iShares Financials Bond (NYSEARCA: MONY ) iShares Industrials Bond (NYSEARCA: ENGN ) iShares MSCI All Country Asia Information Technology (NASDAQ: AAIT ) iShares MSCI All Country Asia x-Japan SmallCap (NASDAQ: AXJS ) iShares MSCI Australia Small-Cap (BATS: EWAS ) iShares MSCI Canada Small-Cap (BATS: EWCS ) iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Growth (NASDAQ: EGRW ) iShares MSCI Emerging Markets EMEA (NASDAQ: EEME ) iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Discretionary (NASDAQ: EMDI ) iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Energy Sector (NASDAQ: EMEY ) iShares MSCI Singapore Small-Cap (NYSEARCA: EWSS ) ETF Deathwatch Archives Disclosure covering writer: No positions in any of the securities mentioned. No positions in any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned. No income, revenue, or other compensation (either directly or indirectly) received from, or on behalf of, any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.