Tag Archives: china

4 Best-Rated Global Mutual Funds For Portfolio Diversification

Global mutual funds are excellent options for investors looking to widen exposure across countries. Central banks of major regions including the Eurozone, China and Japan opted for economic stimulus measures such as rate cuts and monetary easing to boost their respective economies. In this environment, these countries thus provide lucrative investment propositions. Meanwhile, the recent lift-off by the Fed indicated that the U.S. economy is on track to stable growth in the near term. Thus a portfolio having exposure to both domestic and foreign securities will likely help in reducing risk and enhancing returns. However, investors need to be careful while investing in these funds, given the heightened uncertainty. Below we share with you four top-rated global mutual funds. Each has earned a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 (Strong Buy) and is expected to outperform its peers in the future. To view the Zacks Rank and past performance of all global mutual funds, investors can click here to see the complete list of global funds . The Fidelity Worldwide Fund (MUTF: FWWFX ) seeks capital appreciation. FWWFX primarily focuses on acquiring common stocks issued throughout the globe across a wide range of regions. FWWFX considers factors including economic conditions and financial strength before investing in a company. The Fidelity Worldwide fund returned 4.6% over the past three months. As of October 2015, FWWFX held 321 issues, with 2.93% of its assets invested in Alphabet Inc Class A. The American Funds New Perspective Fund (MUTF: ANWPX ) invests in securities of companies throughout the globe in order to take advantage of changes in factors including international trade patterns and economic relationships. ANWPX primarily focuses on acquiring common stocks of companies that have impressive growth prospects. ANWPX may also invest in companies that are expected to pay out dividend in the future to generate income. The American Funds New Perspective A fund returned 6.9% over the past three-month period. ANWPX has an expense ratio of 0.75% compared with the category average of 1.28%. The Polaris Global Value Fund (MUTF: PGVFX ) seeks growth of capital. PGVFX utilizes a value-oriented approach to invest in common stocks of both U.S. and non-U.S. companies, which also include firms from emerging nations. PGVFX defines emerging or developing markets as those which are not listed in the MSCI World Index. The Polaris Global Value fund returned 5.4% over the past three months. Bernard Horn, Jr. is one of the fund managers of PGVFX since 1998. The Harding Loevner Global Equity Portfolio (MUTF: HLMGX ) invests the lion’s share of its assets in securities including common and preferred stocks of companies located in both U.S. and foreign lands. HLMGX allocates its assets to a minimum of 15 countries, including emerging nations. HLMGX may also invest in Depositary Receipts. The Harding Loevner Global Equity Advisor fund returned 7% over the past three-month period. HLMGX has an expense ratio of 1.20% compared with the category average of 1.28%. Link to the original post on Zacks.com

The ETF Monkey 2016 Model Portfolio: Vanguard Implementation

Summary In a previous article, I introduced The ETF Monkey 2016 Model Portfolio. This portfolio offers my suggested model for 2016 based on careful review of the 2016 outlook from multiple high-quality research firms and/or investment providers. In that article, I also promised to build and then track practical implementations of the portfolio using ETFs from three different providers. This is the Vanguard implementation. This article is designed to be read in conjunction with the article in which I introduced The ETF Monkey 2016 Model Portfolio . In that article, I offered what I believe to be a model portfolio for 2016, based on my reading and analysis of materials related to the 2016 outlook from several top-quality sources. I further explained that I would both build and track actual implementations of this portfolio using ETFs from three major providers: Vanguard, Fidelity (featuring iShares funds) and Charles Schwab. This article features the Vanguard implementation. Overview I will start with a couple of tables. The first will briefly recap the asset classes and weightings that I identified in The ETF Monkey 2016 Model Portfolio, followed by the name and symbol of the Vanguard ETF I selected to represent that portion of the portfolio. The second will present a summary of key data for each ETF, including data points such as the expense ratio and average spread, the current dividend yield, and the size and daily volume of the fund. Combined, these will give you, in one glance, a big picture overview of the expenses and returns, as well as some idea of the fund’s tradeability. In this fashion, when I have completed my articles for all three selected providers, you will be able to do some side-by-side comparisons if you wish. Finally, one by one, I will offer other comments and data for each ETF. So let’s get started. Here is the first table, presenting my ETF selections. Asset Class Weighting ETF Name Symbol Domestic Stocks (General) 30.00% Vanguard Total Stock Market VTI Domestic Stocks (High Dividend) 5.00% Vanguard High Dividend Yield VYM Foreign Stocks – Developed 20.00% Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets VEA Foreign Stocks – Emerging Markets 7.50% Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets VWO Foreign Stocks – Europe 5.00% Vanguard FTSE Europe VGK TIPS 15.00% Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities VTIP Bonds 10.00% Vanguard Total Bond Market BND REITS 7.50% Vanguard REIT VNQ Here is the second table, presenting key data points. (click to enlarge) You will likely immediately notice the strength of Vanguard’s offerings across all asset classes represented in the portfolio. With the exception of VTIP, every ETF has an inception date at least as far back as 2007 and Assets Under Management (AUM) of over $10 billion, in some cases much higher. Finally, you will notice that the expense ratio across all ETFs is as low as .05% and no higher than .15%, with 5 of the 8 coming in at or below .10%. In summary, these are long-standing, low-expense ETFs with tremendous size and trading volume, representing great liquidity. This can be important during times of market volatility. Note: In view of Vanguard’s standing in the ETF field, I will use this article as the lead, or reference, article for the three implementations. I will in some cases refer back to, and compare, the related Vanguard ETF when discussing the selections I make for the Fidelity and Charles Schwab implementations of the portfolio. With that overview in mind, let’s now take a look at each of the ETFs. Vanguard Total Stock Market I have already written an in-depth article on this ETF for Seeking Alpha, in preparation for including it in The ETF Monkey Vanguard Core Portfolio . Feel free to consider that article if you wish. VTI tracks essentially the entire investable U.S. market in a single ETF. It does so by tracking the CRSP U.S. Total Market Index . As opposed to the S&P 500, which is comprised solely of large companies (large-cap), the landscape covered by VTI also encompasses many smaller companies (mid-cap, small-cap, and even micro-cap). Such companies, while offering a higher level of risk than their larger brethren, also offer greater opportunities for growth . At .05%, VTI still carries one of the lowest expense ratios in the ETF marketplace. While the competitors I will feature from both iShares and Charles Schwab now offer an even lower .03% expense ratio, I suspect Vanguard is standing pat for now because they offer market-leading expense ratios across a wider variety of ETFs than their competitors. As of 11/30/15, VTI contains 3,791 stocks, with its Top 10 holdings comprising 15.1% of the total. As such, this ETF provides about as solid a foundation as you could hope for when developing your domestic stock allocation. Vanguard High Dividend Yield I have also covered this ETF in depth in a recent article . As it happens, in terms of page views this is the most popular article I have ever managed to write for Seeking Alpha. VYM tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, which represents the U.S.-only component of the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index . This index is comprised of stocks characterized by higher than average dividend yields. It does not include REITS, and also eliminates stocks forecast to pay zero dividends over the next 12 months. It contains 435 stocks, with its Top 10 entities comprising 31.3% of the total. VYM has substantial weightings in sectors such as financials, oil & gas, telecommunications and utilities. This holding is designed to help increase the level of income generated by the portfolio. Its 3.10% yield will act as a nice supplement to the 1.93% yield offered by VTI, while VTI should offer more opportunities for growth . Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets I briefly covered this ETF as well as VWO, the ETF discussed in the next section, in this article . In The ETF Monkey Vanguard Core Portfolio, I use the Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (NYSEARCA: VEU ) as my ETF of choice. This is an excellent vehicle if one wishes to obtain ‘comprehensive’ exposure to foreign stocks, including both developed and emerging markets. At the same time, your relative exposure is decided for you, 17.30% in emerging markets as of 11/30/15. In contrast, for The ETF Monkey 2016 Model Portfolio, I am electing to use a combination of VEA and VWO, which allows us to determine our desired allocation between developed and emerging markets. One interesting note is that Vanguard is in the process of enhancing VEA, switching to an underlying index , which includes Canada, whereas the previous index VEA tracked did not. This ETF currently contains 1,866 holdings, with the Top 10 comprising 11.3% of its assets. It also sports a wonderful .09% expense ratio, stellar for an ETF, which provides international exposure. Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets As alluded to in the section above, this is the counterpart to VEA. This ETF invests in stocks of companies located in emerging markets around the world, such as China, Brazil, Taiwan, and South Africa. Its goal is to closely track the return of the FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Transition Index . The “transition” basically refers to the fact that, as Vanguard words it, the ETF “over time will build exposure to small-capitalization stocks and China A-shares.” However, they are doing so in a manner, which will minimize the transaction costs associated with this endeavor. This ETF currently contains 3,106 holdings, with the Top 10 comprising 18.2% of its assets. It carries an expense ratio of .15%, once again impressive for an ETF, which provides exposure to emerging markets, with all associated trading costs. Vanguard FTSE Europe This ETF seeks to track the performance of the FTSE Developed Europe All Cap Index , which measures the investment return of stocks issued by companies located in the major markets of Europe. A full 72.5% of the fund’s assets are comprised of companies in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Switzerland. This ETF currently contains 1,238 holdings, with the Top 10 comprising 16.0% of its assets. As mentioned in the article in which I introduced The ETF Monkey 2016 Core Portfolio, my goal was to slightly increase the overall weighting, or effect, of Europe in the portfolio. In that vein, if you were to compare the two, you would see that 8 of the Top 10 companies in VGK are also in VEA , with two companies from Japan breaking the Top 10 in VEA. As noted above, this ETF carries an expense ratio of .12%. Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities This ETF seeks to track an index that measures the performance of inflation-protected public obligations of the U.S. Treasury that have a remaining maturity of less than five years. As opposed to the iShares TIPS Bond ETF ( TIP), which I will feature in the Fidelity variant of the portfolio, this ETF keeps the maturity shorter. All TIPS have a maturity of 5 years or less, with the average duration being 2.3 years (as opposed to 8.44 years for TIP). As a result, VTIP can be expected to have less real interest rate risk, but also lower total returns relative to a longer-duration TIPS fund, such as TIP. Vanguard Total Bond Market I have already written an in-depth article on this ETF for Seeking Alpha, in preparation for including it in The ETF Monkey Vanguard Core Portfolio . Feel free to consider that article if you wish. This is a great ETF for achieving across-the-board domestic bond exposure in a single source. It contains both government and corporate bonds and maintains a moderate risk profile. It does not include bonds with a credit rating lower than Baa and has an average duration of 5.8 years. As you may be aware, concern has recently been expressed as to the safety and liquidity of bond ETFs. This article concerning a recent major default may be of interest. It features the fact that the default involved a mutual fund, not an ETF, and also that the fund invested in highly speculative and somewhat illiquid junk bonds. In contrast, BND contains 7,746 different bonds, 63.5% of its assets are in U.S. Government bonds, and no bonds rated lower than Baa are included, as noted above. Put otherwise, this is not a speculative vehicle. Vanguard REIT I briefly covered this ETF, along with two competitors, in this article . VNQ is often described as sort of the pre-eminent player in the field, the “big daddy” if you will. With an inception date of 9/23/04, 154 REITs in the portfolio, $27.39 billion in Assets Under Management (AUM), a low .12% expense ratio, and great daily trading volume leading to a wonderful average price spread of .01%, there are many reasons this ETF has been described using terms such as “the king” and “top of the charts.” This ETF tracks the MSCI US REIT Index . The Top 10 holdings comprise 35.9% of its assets, with Simon Property Group (NYSE: SPG ), its single largest holding, carrying a 7.9% weighting. Summary and Conclusion So there you have them. The 8 ETFS that make up the Vanguard implementation of my portfolio. I plan to follow up with similar articles for both Fidelity and Charles Schwab, and finally with an article that will begin the process of actually building and tracking the portfolios as of the closing price of all the components on December 31, 2015. Until then, I wish you… Happy investing!

Nathan Buehler Positions For 2016: Attractive Opportunities In ETFs

You don’t have to trade every day to make above average returns in the market. Patience is the key to any good strategy. For typical ETFs that track broader indexes, watch the management fees when considering a fund. The Fed will continue to provide distractions throughout 2016 with constant assessment and analyses of when they will raise again and what that means for the economy. Welcome to the ETFs section of Seeking Alpha’s Positioning for 2016 series! This year we have once again asked experts on a range of different asset classes and investing strategies to offer their vision for the coming year and beyond. As always, the focus is on an overall approach to portfolio construction. Nathan Buehler has been an author on Seeking Alpha since May 2014, specializing in the coverage of ETFs and volatility investments. In addition to writing on Seeking Alpha, he works full time as a Teacher in the Lee County School District, volunteers as his communities HOA President, and participates in local government. Most of his strategy is geared towards long term outlook with focuses on short term events or situations that create attractive opportunities. Seeking Alpha’s Carolyn Pairitz recently spoke with Nathan to find out what he is expecting from ETFs in 2016. Carolyn Pairitz ((CP)): While you cover a number of ETF topics, the VIX has been your focus on Seeking Alpha. What drew you to study and invest in volatility? Nathan Buehler (NB): I started investing in penny stocks when I was a teenager. I had no idea what I was doing and lost most of the money I invested. I didn’t give up and was always looking for ways to get rich quick. Getting rich quick also led to additional losses. As I grew up and matured I began to realize there was an opportunity to make money off of people that were either looking to get rich quick or panicking. I started researching volatility as an asset class and began practicing with options strategies and trying to learn everything I could about how volatility behaves relative to the market. Eventually I fine-tuned my knowledge of the VIX to the point I felt comfortable trading it. I love investor psychology and I will often have different takes and points of view on the VIX than other seasoned investors. This again comes from the fact I am self-taught. I learn something new every day and use that to continuously improve upon my investment objectives. CP: Do you have any advice for readers considering ETFs for their portfolios in 2016? NB: For typical ETFs that track broader indexes, watch the management fees. There are a number of very low cost funds run by very reputable companies. For volatility ETFs my only advice is to fully educate yourself before trading these products. This is also true for many ETFs that track commodities and have very specific objectives. ETFs don’t always behave like a stock and can lead to serious losses if an investor is not properly prepared. CP: Going into 2015, which asset classes are you overweight? Which are you underweight? NB: In my general portfolio I have moved overweight in select oil companies. I believe this is a cyclical pattern and as long oil prices stay low, demand will keep increasing. Eventually economics will take over and the present fear factor will clear itself up. These are positions I plan on keeping for 5-10 years so even if oil takes another year to recover, I am fine with waiting. CP: The SEC recently proposed rules that could shake up the current structure of leveraged ETFs. Could you elaborate on this further and how it could affect the ETF market in 2016? NB: The ETF companies have been on top of this from the start and ProShares even contacted me directly in response to one of my articles that covered the topic. For right now it doesn’t appear that this rule will have a real effect on any of the 2x leverage ETFs. However, many if not all 3x leverage products could be forced to close. I am not a fan of 3x leverage products and I feel this is the right decision to protect investors from themselves. At some point it is wrong to let people purchase a product that could wipe out their entire net worth in one day. Gambling is still legal if someone wants to bet it all on black. CP: With the Fed having raised fund rates this December, are you updating you VIX strategy or do you feel this change was already priced into the market? NB: I felt that the rise in rates was long overdue and well expected by the market. I was hoping for a hold which would have created an excellent opportunity for a sharp increase in volatility. The Fed will continue to provide distractions throughout 2016 with constant assessment and analyses of when they will raise again and what that means for the economy. To me, the Fed is just a bunch of noise. They get people hopped up and will calm the markets down. They have been a good tool in respects to volatility. CP: Are there any global issues on the horizon that ETF investors should pay particular attention to? NB: Geopolitical events always provide good opportunities for volatility. Two years ago Russia was providing regular spikes in volatility. The world loves a villain. We make movies about them and the super heroes that save us. Russia and China used to be those villains in regards to the stock market. Investors loved to gawk over what Russia was doing, who they were invading, and how China’s economy was collapsing. Now we have ISIS. Friends and foes alike have come together to take on ISIS. As far as I am concerned, this is a negative for volatility, a positive for the market, and a win for humanity. CP: As a teacher and an author on Seeking Alpha, do you have any advice for readers who work a full time job but also want to be involved in the markets? NB: There have been multiple studies out on how teachers make the best investors. Each of these studies cited one fact consistently, lack of trading. You don’t have to trade every day to make above average returns in the market. I constantly get questions on timing the market, when to get in, when to get out, etc. Investors need to chill out. My goal is to make a 15% return during the calendar year. Not 15% in January and then try for 80% by December. Patience is the key to any good strategy and if you are glued to your monitor all day watching the ticks of the market it isn’t healthy. I would conclude that a full time job gives you proper time to analyze the markets in the evenings and make more rational decisions by the next trading day.