Tag Archives: checkbox

New Trend-Following Fund Limits Your Downside

By Alan Gula, CFA Paul Tudor Jones (PTJ), a legendary trader and hedge fund manager, essentially predicted the stock market crash of 1987. In a PBS documentary, PTJ asserted, “There will be some type of a decline, without a question, in the next 10 to 20 months… it will be earth shaking… it will create headlines that will dwarf anything that’s happened up to this point in time.” On October 19, 1987 the S&P 500 dropped 20.5% in a single day. Many investors were eviscerated, and some traders were completely wiped out. That month, PTJ’s fund was up an astonishing 62%. PTJ is an ardent proponent of trend following. That is, you always want to be positioned with the prevailing price trend. If a security or futures contract is trending higher, then be long. If it’s trending lower, get flat (no position) or be short. So how do we determine the predominant trend? In an interview with Tony Robbins for Money: Master the Game , PTJ revealed that his preferred metric is the 200-day moving average of closing prices. Regarding the 1987 crash, Robbins asked, “Did your theory about the 200-day moving average alert you to that one?” PTJ responded, “You got it. It [equity index] had gone under the 200-day moving target. At the very top of the crash, I was flat.” The following chart helps illustrate what PTJ saw: Trend following has been around for ages. But now funds are popping up that automate the process. For example, the Pacer Trendpilot 750 ETF (BATS: PTLC ) was launched in June 2015. This exchange-traded fund (ETF) alternates exposure to the Wilshire U.S. Large-Cap Index (Index) or U.S. Treasury bills (T-Bills) depending on the trend indicators. Here are the allocation rules: Positive Trend Established: When the Index closes above its 200-day simple moving average (NYSE: SMA ) for five consecutive trading days, the exposure of the fund will be 100% to the Index. In other words, the fund will be fully invested in equities. Negative Trend Established: When the Index closes below its 200-day SMA for five consecutive trading days, the exposure of the fund will be 50% to the Index and 50% to 3-month T-Bills. Negative Trend Confirmed: When the Index’s 200-day SMA closes lower than its value from five business days earlier, the exposure of the fund will be 100% to 3-month T-Bills. These rules are designed to keep the fund invested when the stock market’s trend is up but to protect capital with the safety of T-Bills during down trends. Also, the rules attempt to minimize fund turnover during periods of high volatility. PTLC seeks to replicate the performance of a trend-following index. The chart below shows its back-tested results. The trend following index has outperformed over the long term with much smaller drawdowns (peak-to-trough declines). The benefits of trend following as a form of risk management can clearly be seen during the equity bear markets in 2001-2002 and 2008-2009 (yellow circles). The expense ratio of 0.6% for PTLC is a bit high, but the ETF does conveniently simplify the trend-following process. It’s worth noting that the ETF’s current exposure is 100% T-Bills, meaning that a stock market downtrend has been confirmed. The 200-day moving average is such a simple indicator that few people believe it offers valuable information. Also, with so much focus on daily catalysts and short-term moves in the media, the big-picture trend gets lost amid the din. The last time the S&P 500 crossed below its 200-day SMA was at the very end of 2015. I doubt PTJ was caught off guard by this year’s 10.5% decline through February 11.

3 Top-Rated Government Intermediate Bond Mutual Funds To Consider

Mutual funds investing in debt securities are among the most secure investment options which provide regular income while protecting the capital invested. Funds which are part of this category bring a great deal of stability to portfolios with a large proportion of equity, while providing dividends more frequently than individual bonds. U.S. government bond funds usually invest in Treasury bills, notes and securities issued by government agencies. They are considered to be the safest in the bond fund category and are ideal options for the risk-averse investor. Meanwhile, intermediate-term funds usually provide a safer option for investors, when compared to small-term funds. Fixed income securities having an average maturity period between 3 and 10 years are classified as intermediate securities. These funds are believed to ensure more stability and provide a higher return than what short-term funds offer. Below, we will share with you 3 top-rated government intermediate bond mutual funds. Each has earned a Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) as we expect these mutual funds to outperform their peers in the future. To view the Zacks Rank and past performance of all government intermediate bond funds, investors can click here to see the complete list of funds . Hartford US Government Securities HLS IB (MUTF: HBUSX ) invests a major portion of its assets in securities that are affiliated to the U.S. government or its entities. HBUSX invests in U.S. treasury instruments and other securities of the U.S. government. HBUSX may also invest in mortgage-backed securities of the U.S. government. The Hartford US Government Secs HLS IB fund has a three-year annualized return of 1.2%. Michael F. Garrett is the fund manager since 2012. AMG Managers Intermediate Duration Government (MUTF: MGIDX ) seeks total return more than that of market indices related to mortgage-backed securities. MGIDX primarily invests in debt securities of the U.S. government or other agencies authorized by the government. MGIDX invests in securities having an impressive credit quality to reduce risk. The AMG Managers Intermediate Duration Government fund has a three-year annualized return of 2.6%. As of June 2015, MGIDX held 369 issues with 11.99% of its assets invested in Freddie Mac Gold Single Family TBA 4% 2046-03-01. Performance Trust Strategic Bond (MUTF: PTIAX ) invests a large portion of its assets in fixed-income instruments which include corporate, government and municipal bonds, asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities and other fixed-income instruments issued by various U.S. governments, municipal or private-sector entities. PTIAX seeks interest income and potential capital appreciation. The Performance Trust Strategic Bond fund has a three-year annualized return of 3.8%. PTIAX has an expense ratio of 0.84% as compared to the category average of 1.01%. To view the Zacks Rank and past performance of all government intermediate bond mutual funds, investors can click here to see the complete list of funds . By applying the Zacks Rank to mutual funds, investors can find funds that not only outpaced the market in the past, but are also expected to outperform going forward. Pick the best mutual funds with the Zacks Rank. Original Post

Video: The World Is Going Passive. Is It A Mistake?

Man Group’s 2016 Unconventional Views video series is designed to present original thoughts and insights that challenge the consensus view. The videos feature leading executives from the firm’s four investment engines, Man AHL, Man GLG, Man FRM and Man Numeric, explaining their views on various investment themes. In recent years, there has been a seismic shift within the asset management industry from active to passive investing. In this video, Ben Funnell, Portfolio Manager at Man GLG, considers this shift and explains why he thinks the growing alpha opportunity in the market is tipping the balance back in favor of active management. He outlines several structural and cyclical reasons to support his argument that today’s investors should take a second look at active management: Fund alpha is more important later in a market cycle, and this alpha is vital for many institutional investors with real growth hurdles and obligations to distribute. The stock-picker’s opportunity set is increasing along with the percentage of stock-specific return, which may represent a structural change. Smart beta may not be so smart, especially since allocating away from active managers still requires active decision-making. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The value of an investment and any income derived from it can go down as well as up and investors may not get back their original amount invested. Opinions expressed are those of the author, may not be shared by all personnel of Man Group plc (‘Man’) and are subject to change without notice.