Tag Archives: california

Top 5 Mutual Fund Sectors In 2015

While most of the major mutual fund sectors struggled to finish 2015 in the green amid concerns stemming from China-led global growth worries and the slump in oil prices, some succeeded in coming out with flying colors. The strong rebound in the fourth quarter, after a declining trend till the third quarter, primarily boosted these funds. The Dow and the S&P 500 posted their worst yearly performances since 2008, and cash flows were also on the discouraging side. Mutual funds witnessed huge cash outflows in 2015, which hit record highs multiple times. While US-focused mutual fund categories failed to register double-digit gains in 2015, only the Japan Stock category registered growth. Mutual funds started the year 2015 on a positive note, with 87% of funds finishing in the green in the first quarter. But their performance deteriorated in the second quarter, when only 41% of funds succeeded in registering gains. The performance in the third quarter was the worst in four years. While only 17% of mutual funds finished in the green in the quarter, the Bear Market funds category, which bet against the market uptrend, emerged as the top gainer in both August and September, adding 9.1% and 4.2%, respectively. However, mutual funds recovered significantly in the fourth quarter, which also included October – the best month in four years. Meanwhile, foreign mutual funds, including those focused on acquiring Japanese stocks, outperformed domestic mutual funds last year. In such a scenario, we present the top 10 mutual fund categories in 2015: Mutual Fund Category 2015 Return (%) Japan Stock 11.97 Health 8.05 Foreign Small/Mid Growth 7.04 Technology 5.21 Consumer Defensive 4.15 High Yield Muni 4.09 Foreign Small/Mid Blend 3.79 Muni California Long 3.72 Large Growth 3.6 Preferred Stock 3.18 Source: Morningstar Major Concerns As mentioned earlier, mutual fund cash flows remained weak in 2015, mostly due to the overall negative tone of the U.S. markets. As a matter of fact, in the first half of 2015, fund inflows slumped 36% year over year to $143 billion. This drastic fall was largely due to the dismal second quarter, wherein inflows declined to $41 billion through June 17, comparing unfavorably with $102 billion of inflows in the first quarter. The markets were affected all-year round by several concerns, such as sluggish growth in major economies, including China and the eurozone, the slump in oil prices, a strong dollar and rate hike fears. Worries emanating from Grexit concerns, the plunge in biotech stocks following price gouging concerns and geopolitical tensions in regions like Yemen and Syria also dealt huge blows to the major benchmarks. Additionally, in the week that the Fed finally decided to hike rates, bond mutual funds witnessed massive outflows. According to Lipper, for the week ending December 16, $15.4 billion was pulled out of taxable bond funds. Also, high yield junk bond funds witnessed the largest outflow of $3.8 billion since August 2014 in the same week. An outflow of $5.1 billion from investment-grade bond funds was the biggest since Lipper started recording data in 1992. 5 Best-Performing Fund Categories in 2015 In this section, we have highlighted the five best-performing mutual fund categories of 2015 and also recommend one mutual fund from each category that has a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 (Strong Buy) and other strong fundamentals. Japan Stock Japan opted for several economic stimulus measures last year, which proved to be more effective than the steps taken by China and the eurozone. The economy rebounded strongly in the third quarter to register a GDP growth rate of 1%, contrary to the second quarter’s contraction of 0.5%. Japan’s key index, Nikkei, hit an 18-year high in 2015. Hence, the Japan Stock category, which was also the best gainer in the first half of 2015, finished right at the top with nearly 12% gains last year. Fidelity Japan Smaller Companies Fund No Load (MUTF: FJSCX ), which invests most of its assets in securities of Japanese small-cap companies or other instruments that are economically connected with Japan, was one of the top performers of this category. The fund returned 12.6% last year. It also has a 3- and 5-year annualized return of 16.6% and 10.2%, respectively. Moreover, FJSCX’s expense ratio of 0.97% is lower than its category average of 1.43%. Healthcare The healthcare category, which is considered as a consistent performer, came in second in 2015. A massive sell-off in biotech stocks through August and September, and concerns regarding Hillary Clinton’s plan to prevent “price gouging” for specialty drugs had a negative impact on the category. However, a strong rebound in the fourth quarter helped the sector to finish the year on a positive note with a modest gain of 8.1% in 2015. Encouraging third-quarter earnings results, merger and acquisition activities, product approvals and encouraging pipeline updates were mainly behind the rebound. Vanguard Health Care Fund Investor (MUTF: VGHCX ) invests in healthcare companies, including pharmaceutical firms, medical supply companies and companies engaged in operations related to medical and biochemical. The fund returned 3.8% in 2015 and has an expense ratio of only 0.34%, compared to the category average of 1.37%. VGHCX also has a 3- and 5-year annualized return of 24.8% and 20.3%, respectively. Foreign Small/Mid Growth Although concerns regarding sluggish growth throughout the globe had a negative impact on markets in most of 2015, the Foreign Small/Mid Growth sector managed to register healthy gains. Investors found foreign countries attractive, as the central banks of major regions opted for economic stimulus measures. As a result, the sector occupied the third position with more than 7% yearly gain. AllianzGI International Small-Cap Fund A (MUTF: AOPAX ) primarily invests in securities of companies having market capitalization similar to those included in the MSCI World Small-Cap Index. The fund returned 9.8% last year. It also has a 3- and 5-year annualized return of 9.8% and 6.1%, respectively. AOPAX’s expense ratio of 1.45% is lower than its category average of 1.53%. Technology Though several concerns, including a stronger dollar and weak global growth, negatively impacted the technology sector, it was one of the few bright spots in 2015. Broad-based gains in the sector helped the tech-heavy Nasdaq to clearly outperform the other major benchmarks in 2015. Meanwhile, the sector was one of the best performers in the third-quarter earnings season. These factors boosted the category to increase 5.2% in 2015. T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund No Load (MUTF: PRGTX ) invests the majority of its assets in companies expected to derive a large proportion of their revenues from the development and application of technology. It returned 10.4% in 2015 and has an expense ratio of 0.91%, which compares favorably to the category average of 1.45%. The fund also has a 3- and 5-year annualized return of 24.4% and 17.3%, respectively. Consumer Defensive This is one of the main categories that gained from the low oil price environment. Also, a steady increase in consumer expenditure played an important role in boosting the U.S. economy throughout 2015, helped the category to finish in the positive territory. Additionally, a strong job market, which includes healthy job gains and a declining unemployment rate, also boosted the category for most of the year. As such, Consumer Defensive returned nearly 4.2% in 2015 and finished in the top five. Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio No Load (MUTF: FSRPX ) invests a large chunk of its assets in securities of firms involved in merchandising finished goods and services to consumers. The fund returned 17.8% last year. It also has a 3- and 5-year annualized return of 21.4% and 19.1%, respectively. FSRPX’s expense ratio of 0.81% is lower than its category average of 1.41%. Original Post

Asset Class Weekly: From The High-Yield Bond Battlefront

Summary Capital markets are under fire. Just two weeks ago, Asset Class Weekly focused on the troubles that were brewing in the high-yield bond market. What a difference two weeks make. A growing number of creditors in the high-yield bond market are fighting for survival. Capital markets are under fire. Just two weeks ago, Asset Class Weekly focused on the troubles that were brewing in the high-yield bond market. What a difference two weeks make. For while many investors are getting ready to settle in for the holiday season, a growing number of creditors in the high-yield bond market are fighting for survival. Given the rapid pace of the descent in high-yield bonds over the past two weeks, it is worthwhile to check in with the latest from the high-yield bond market. It was almost exactly one year ago in December 2014 that I first began sounding the alarm about the stresses building in the high-yield bond market. At that time, the sharp decline in oil since the summer of 2014 and in particular since the OPEC meeting that came the day after Thanksgiving last year had the high-yield bond market starting to question the long-term viability of selected names in the universe. At the time, nearly all of the names under pressure in the high-yield bond space came from the oil patch. And the measure of stress at the time was the fact that 13 publicly-traded companies in the high-yield bond universe as measured by the iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: HYG ) had bonds were trading at a 25% to 50% discount to their par value while another 22 publicly-traded companies had bonds that were trading at a 10% to 25% discount to par. On December 12, 2014, when I published this first high-yield bond (NYSEARCA: JNK ) article, the stock market as measured by the S&P 500 Index closed at 2,002.33. As of the end of last week on December 18, 2015, the S&P 500 Index closed at 2,005.55. But while the headline stock market index might imply that not much has changed over the past year, oh so very much has changed underneath the market surface. And nowhere is this more true in a chronically bad way than in the high-yield bond market. Once again for emphasis, we had 13 creditors with bonds trading at a 25% to 50% discount to par and another 22 companies with bonds trading at a 10% to 25% discount to par almost exactly a year ago at this time. And this was a sign of building stress. So where exactly are we a year later? Today, we have 27 publicly-traded companies with bonds trading at a 25% to 50% discount to par. Sure, this is roughly double where we were at this time last year, but not so bad, right? Au contraire. W hile this 25% to 50% discount group was considered the front lines of high-yield bond market stress, this is the relatively better side of the story today. Triage Let’s begin. We have had a handful of companies in the high-yield bond space that have since either entered into bankruptcy or have creatively restructured in a grasp for survival. We also now have 11 publicly-traded companies that are trading at a more than 75% discount to par. In short, these are firms that have been badly wounded in operational battle and are now in financial market triage fighting for their lives. Arch Coal (NYSE: ACI ) BreitBurn Energy Partners (NASDAQ: BBEP ) Chesapeake Energy (NYSE: CHK ) Cliff Natural Resources (NYSE: CLF ) Energy XXI (NASDAQ: EXXI ) Linn Energy (NASDAQ: LINE ) Peabody Energy (NYSE: BTU ) Penn Virginia (NYSE: PVA ) Seventy Seven Energy (NYSE: SSE ) Ultra Petroleum (NYSE: UPL ) Verso ( OTCQB:VRSZ ) It should be noted that the list above is not at all from the fringes of capital markets as names like Chesapeake Energy and Ultra Petroleum are among the larger players in the energy space. The Front Line In the next group on the list, we have another 18 publicly-traded companies in the high-yield bond space whose bonds are also trading at a highly stressed 50% to 75% discount to their par value. These include the following: AK Steel (NYSE: AKS ) California Resources (NYSE: CRC ) CHC Group (NYSE: HELI ) Comstock Resources (NYSE: CRK ) Denbury Resources (NYSE: DNR ) EXCO Resources (NYSE: XCO ) Genworth Financial (NYSE: GNW ) Halcon Resources (NYSE: HK ) Intelsat (NYSE: I ) Memorial Production Partners (NASDAQ: MEMP ) Midstates Petroleum (NYSE: MPO ) Navios Maritime (NYSE: NM ) Pacific Drilling (NYSE: PACD ) Sanchez Energy (NYSE: SN ) SandRidge Energy (NYSE: SD ) Transocean (NYSE: RIG ) U.S. Steel (NYSE: X ) Vantage Drilling Company (NYSEMKT: VTG ) It is worth noting that seven companies descended into this group within the last two weeks. This includes California Resources, Denbury Resources, Intelsat, Memorial Production Partners, Midstates Petroleum, Sanchez Energy and Transocean. A number of the names on the above list are also meaningful players in the energy space. And the list is also not limited to just names in the energy space, as we also have communications, retail, industrial and consumer products companies now also showing up on this front line distressed list. Preparing For Battle: The Second Wave In the next group on the list, which was formerly the front line just one year ago, we have as mentioned above 25 publicly-traded companies in the high-yield bond space that are trading at a 25% to 50% discount to par. These companies currently under fire include the following: Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ: AMD ) Allegheny Technologies (NYSE: ATI ) Antero Resources (NYSE: AR ) ArcelorMittal (NYSE: MT ) Avon Products (NYSE: AVP ) Bombardier ( OTCQX:BDRBF ) Chemours (NYSE: CC ) CONSOL Energy (NYSE: CNX ) DCP Midstream Partners (NYSE: DPM ) Energy Transfer Equity (NYSE: ETE ) iHeartMedia ( OTCPK:IHRT ) Navistar International (NYSE: NAV ) Oasis Petroleum (NYSE: OAS ) ONEOK (NYSE: OKE ) Precision Drilling (NYSE: PDS ) Range Resources (NYSE: RRC ) QEP Resources (NYSE: QEP ) Scientific Games (NASDAQ: SGMS ) SM Energy (NYSE: SM ) Sprint (NYSE: S ) Talen Energy (NYSE: TLN ) Tronox (NYSE: TROX ) Whiting Petroleum (NYSE: WLL ) Windstream (NASDAQ: WIN ) WPX Energy (NYSE: WPX ) In addition to this list above that includes some eye-opening names, two notable retailers that are currently not publicly traded but are also now listed among this group. These are Neiman Marcus (Pending: NMG ) and Toys “R” Us. But perhaps more troubling than this list from the high-yield space is the suddenly expanding list from the investment-grade corporate bond universe as measured by the iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: LQD ). Just three weeks ago at the end of November, only one name (Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE: FCX )) made this 25% to 50% discount to par list. Today, once again just three weeks later, there are 13. These are listed below: Barrick Gold (NYSE: ABX ) Cenovus Energy (NYSE: CVE ) Continental Resources (NYSE: CLR ) Devon Energy (NYSE: DVN ) Ensco (NYSE: ESV ) Energy Transfer Partners (NYSE: ETP ) Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE: EPD ) Freeport-McMoRan Kinder Morgan (NYSE: KMI ) Newmont Mining (NYSE: NEM ) Southwestern Energy (NYSE: SWN ) Viacom (NASDAQ: VIA ) Williams Companies (NYSE: WMB ) It is one thing to see signs of credit stress in the high-yield bond space, but it is another thing altogether when these pressures begin to spread in the investment grade space. Overall, these lists combined bring us to 40 publicly traded or notable companies that are trading at a 25% to 50% discount to par. Bottom Line Perhaps this is all just a short-term phase in the bond market. It is possible that we are near or at a bottom and these increasingly stressed bond prices will soon start bouncing higher. Maybe, but probably not. The deterioration in the high-yield bond space has been brewing for some time. And it has picked up dramatically in the past couple of weeks with the magnitude of the price declines in many names across the high-yield bond spectrum well in excess of -20%. The fact that the problem has now started to spread to the investment-grade bond space is even more problematic, as it suggests that a broader cleansing process may now be at work. And the next time we regroup to explore this list, it seems highly probable that we will add a whole new cast of characters, as scores of names now reside in the 10% to 25% discount to par list that have not even bothered to explore here that are also experiencing accelerating price declines in their own right. Lastly, this decelerating pace of credit deterioration is taking place in an environment where the U.S. Federal Reserve just raised interest rates off of the zero bound for the first time since the outbreak of the financial crisis. While I applaud the Fed for finally showing the courage to act, it is unfortunately doing so far too late at this point. Thus, for those analysts and experts that are calling for another year of positive U.S. stock market gains in 2016 despite the fact that stock valuations are already hovering at historically high levels, unless we see the Federal Reserve do a complete about face and start pouring liquidity back into financial markets (do not rule this possibility out over the next 12 months), we may find ourselves with results that are decidedly different than positive for stocks this time next year. Special Notice : As many readers have likely seen by now, I also provide a premium service on Seeking Alpha called The Universal . The service targets winning investment portfolio strategies across the asset class universe in both bear and bull markets with a focus on attractive return opportunities, risk control and loss minimization. The Universal includes timely asset allocation models, weekly strategy updates, targeted stock watch lists, feature articles and specific buy/sell recommendations. It is also a forum for real-time updates and analysis during periods of heightened market stress. The Universal currently costs $29 per month or $239 per year to subscribe. But starting on January 1, 2016, the subscription cost for The Universal will increase to $39 per month or $299 per year. Existing subscribers as well as those who sign up by December 31, 2015, however, will continue to pay the lower $29 per month or $239 per year rate. As a result, if you are interested in trying my premium service and have not already joined, I encourage you to sign up before the end of the year to lock in the lower rate. And if you are concerned that the service may not be a good fit, you are protected by Seeking Alpha’s unconditional prorated money-back guarantee. Questions about The Universal? Send me an e-mail at anytime and I will respond with answers to your questions. Thanks, and I look forward to collaborating with you on The Universal. Disclosure : This article is for information purposes only. There are risks involved with investing including loss of principal. Gerring Capital Partners makes no explicit or implicit guarantee with respect to performance or the outcome of any investment or projections made. There is no guarantee that the goals of the strategies discussed by Gerring Capital Partners will be met. Editor’s Note: This article covers one or more stocks trading at less than $1 per share and/or with less than a $100 million market cap. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.