Tag Archives: author

3 Top-Rated Government Intermediate Bond Mutual Funds To Consider

Mutual funds investing in debt securities are among the most secure investment options which provide regular income while protecting the capital invested. Funds which are part of this category bring a great deal of stability to portfolios with a large proportion of equity, while providing dividends more frequently than individual bonds. U.S. government bond funds usually invest in Treasury bills, notes and securities issued by government agencies. They are considered to be the safest in the bond fund category and are ideal options for the risk-averse investor. Meanwhile, intermediate-term funds usually provide a safer option for investors, when compared to small-term funds. Fixed income securities having an average maturity period between 3 and 10 years are classified as intermediate securities. These funds are believed to ensure more stability and provide a higher return than what short-term funds offer. Below, we will share with you 3 top-rated government intermediate bond mutual funds. Each has earned a Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) as we expect these mutual funds to outperform their peers in the future. To view the Zacks Rank and past performance of all government intermediate bond funds, investors can click here to see the complete list of funds . Hartford US Government Securities HLS IB (MUTF: HBUSX ) invests a major portion of its assets in securities that are affiliated to the U.S. government or its entities. HBUSX invests in U.S. treasury instruments and other securities of the U.S. government. HBUSX may also invest in mortgage-backed securities of the U.S. government. The Hartford US Government Secs HLS IB fund has a three-year annualized return of 1.2%. Michael F. Garrett is the fund manager since 2012. AMG Managers Intermediate Duration Government (MUTF: MGIDX ) seeks total return more than that of market indices related to mortgage-backed securities. MGIDX primarily invests in debt securities of the U.S. government or other agencies authorized by the government. MGIDX invests in securities having an impressive credit quality to reduce risk. The AMG Managers Intermediate Duration Government fund has a three-year annualized return of 2.6%. As of June 2015, MGIDX held 369 issues with 11.99% of its assets invested in Freddie Mac Gold Single Family TBA 4% 2046-03-01. Performance Trust Strategic Bond (MUTF: PTIAX ) invests a large portion of its assets in fixed-income instruments which include corporate, government and municipal bonds, asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities and other fixed-income instruments issued by various U.S. governments, municipal or private-sector entities. PTIAX seeks interest income and potential capital appreciation. The Performance Trust Strategic Bond fund has a three-year annualized return of 3.8%. PTIAX has an expense ratio of 0.84% as compared to the category average of 1.01%. To view the Zacks Rank and past performance of all government intermediate bond mutual funds, investors can click here to see the complete list of funds . By applying the Zacks Rank to mutual funds, investors can find funds that not only outpaced the market in the past, but are also expected to outperform going forward. Pick the best mutual funds with the Zacks Rank. Original Post

The Role Of Quality In Long-Term Value Creation

By Kelly Tang This is the third in a series of blog posts relating to the launch of the S&P Long-Term Value Creation (LTVC) Global Index . In the last blog, we discussed how long-term investing requires looking at metrics that go beyond the standard GAAP financial accounting measures and why the Economic Dimension (ED) score from RobecoSAM was the sustainability score that best complemented the long-term aim of the S&P LTVC Global Index. While the ED score may be a key metric of a firm’s long-term focus on its goals, it is also important to the index to identify how these policies have translated themselves and are reflected in the quality of a company’s earnings, balance sheet, and profitability. It is safe to say that the definition of quality and the characteristics of a high-quality company will generate numerous and varied responses from academics and analysts alike. In addition, the difference in opinion will persist in not only the definition, but also the number of metrics that should be used to gauge quality. Our colleagues previously examined the quality debate and presented their findings and S&P Dow Jones Indices’ stance in ” Quality: A Distinct Equity Factor? ” (Ung and Luk). The paper presented the framework for defining quality, which included categories such as profitability, earnings quality, and strength in balance sheet. The report included back-tested performance results, which showed that the proposed quality factor was beneficial in contributing to excess long-term investment returns. For the S&P Quality Indices, the following three metrics are used to define a quality company. Return on equity (ROE) was selected as the preferred metric for profitability, and companies with higher ROEs have sustained competitive advantages such as branding or competitive positioning, which help them maintain their profitability. Quality of earnings was another criterion to determine quality as measured by the balance sheet accruals (BSA) ratio (change in net operating assets/average operating assets). The BSA provides a way to measure how a firm scores in its earnings management; higher accruals are a potential red flag as higher levels of noncash items may lead to financial statement revisions. Finally, the financial leverage ratio was selected as the third metric to gauge balance sheet strength, with the rationale that high-quality companies have the ability to finance their ongoing business activities without having to incur excessive debt levels, protecting them in times of crisis. One of the key findings from Ung and Luk’s paper was that although quality strategies have performed well on their own, they appeared to work well when combined with other factor strategies as well. This was the basis for our thinking to combine quality with economic sustainability factors to create the S&P LTVC Global Index. In our final blog of the series, we will dig deeper into the unique structural aspects and performance attributes of the S&P LTVC Global Index. Disclosure: © S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC 2015. Indexology® is a trademark of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC (SPDJI). S&P® is a trademark of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC and Dow Jones® is a trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC, and those marks have been licensed to S&P DJI. This material is reproduced with the prior written consent of S&P DJI. For more information on S&P DJI and to see our full disclaimer, visit www.spdji.com/terms-of-use .

5 Picks From Top Equity-Focused Mutual Fund Sectors

In spite of a strong rebound in the second half of February, the U.S. benchmarks mostly ended the month in the red due to China-led global growth worries, mixed domestic economic data and rate hike uncertainty. Though the Dow ended the month in the green, the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq witnessed the third straight month of loss for the first time since September 2011. However, strong gains in the beaten down sectors and a considerable rise in oil price helped the benchmarks to pare down some of the losses. Meanwhile, U.S. equity-based mutual funds continued to witness significant outflows and the comparatively safer ones remained the drawing cards. Moreover, nearly half of the broader mutual fund categories ended the month in the negative territory. Then again, most of the equity-based mutual fund sectors registered gains during the month. Let’s dig into the drivers and dampeners of February. Major Market Impacts Concerns over weak global growth played a major role in dragging most of the benchmarks to the negative zone in February. Yet another rate cut by the People’s Bank of China on Monday intensified worries over the country’s sluggish economy. The central bank lowered the reserve requirement ratio by 0.5% to 17% in order to boost monetary inflow. This was the fifth rate cut by the bank over the past one year. On the domestic front, economic data was mixed over the month of February. Key manufacturing and servicing data for January was pretty discouraging. Though the unemployment rate declined to 4.9% in January, the number of jobs generated declined significantly to 151,000 from 262,000 in December. Moreover, waning consumer sentiment and decline in most of the home sales data had a negative impact on investors. However, increased industrial production, higher key inflation data, and an upwardly revised fourth-quarter GDP rate boosted investor sentiment. As per the “second” estimate by the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the economy expanded by an annual rate of 1% in the fourth quarter, up from the consensus estimate of 0.4% growth. Fourth-quarter GDP data was revised upward from the previously estimated 0.7% rise. Separately, the highest increase of 1.7% in core PCE (Personal Consumptions Expenditure) index – an important indicator of inflation – in January since July 2014 increased the possibility of a sooner-than-expected rate hike. This is because the figure came close to the Fed’s target of 2%. Though comments from some of the Fed officials suggested that there may not be a lift-off in March, these did not give any clear indication on whether the key interest rates will be hiked at all this year. However, WTI crude sprung a sweet surprise in February. After plunging to the 13-year low level of $26.05 on Feb. 11, WTI crude gained nearly 30% on chances of a production cut. This had a positive impact on energy shares, which in turn boosted the major benchmarks. The beaten down sectors like materials, industrials and financials gained 10.9%, 7.2% and 0.6%, respectively, last month. These sectors are down 3.1%, 1.1% and 10.5%, respectively, in the year-to-date frame. Outflows in Stock Funds Continue According to Lipper, U.S.-based stock funds saw withdrawals of $2.8 billion for the week ended Feb. 24, which was the eighth straight week of outflows. While funds focused on domestic stocks witnessed an outflow of $2.5 billion, those focused on stocks from foreign markets – including China, Europe, Japan and emerging economies – saw withdrawal of $231 million. Of the sectors that Lipper tracks, only utility posted positive flows during the week by virtue of its safe-haven appeal. It was the seventh consecutive week of inflows of this sector. In general, the safer options attracted significant amount of inflows. During the week ending Feb. 24, U.S. funds investing in precious metals attracted $2.3 billion in investments. Moreover, funds that emphasize investing in taxable bond added $5.1 billion, witnessing the first straight week of inflows. The U.S. Treasury funds registered inflows for the eleventh consecutive week by attracting $440 million. Separately, though riskier funds such as investment-grade corporate debt funds, high-yield bond funds and emerging market debt funds drew investor attention in the week under consideration, these saw significant outflows over the month. 5 Mutual Funds to Buy Despite continued outflows, equity-focused mutual funds performed better in the month of February than January. Out of the 14 equity sectors that are tracked by Morningstar, nine ended the month in the green. Hence, we have identified a fundamentally strong mutual fund from each of the five top performing mutual fund sectors of February. The funds mentioned below carry either a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 (Strong Buy) or #2 (Buy). We expect these funds to outperform their peers in the future. Remember, the goal of the Zacks Mutual Fund Rank is to guide investors to identify potential winners and losers. Unlike most of the fund rating systems, the Zacks Mutual Fund Rank is not just focused on past performance but also on the likely future success of the fund. These funds also have an encouraging one-month return and minimum initial investment of less than $5,000. Also, these funds have a low expense ratio and no sales load. First – Equity Precious Metals gained 29.9% American Century Quantitative Equity Funds Global Gold Fund (MUTF: BGEIX ) invests in securities of global companies whose operations are related to gold or other precious metals. The fund invests the lion’s share of its assets in companies involved in processing, mining, fabricating and distributing gold or other precious metals. BGEIX currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #2 and has a one-month return of 31.78%. Annual expense ratio of 0.67% is lower than the category average of 1.44%. Second – Industrials gained 3.6% Fidelity Select Industrials Portfolio (MUTF: FCYIX ) seeks growth of capital. FCYIX invests a large chunk of its assets in common stocks of companies worldwide that are involved in operations related to industrial products. Notably, FCYIX is non-diversified. FCYIX currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #2 and has a one-month return of 6.5%. Annual expense ratio of 0.78% is lower than the category average of 1.33%. Third – Natural Resources gained 2.1% T. Rowe Price New Era Fund (MUTF: PRNEX ) invests at least 75% of its assets in common stocks of companies from the natural resource domain. PRNEX may also invest in securities of companies having impressive growth prospects. Currently, PRNEX carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 and has a one-month return of 7.4%. Annual expense ratio of 0.67% is lower than the category average of 1.46%. Fourth – Communications gained 1.8% Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio (MUTF: FSTCX ) seeks capital growth. FSTCX invests the major portion of its assets in common stocks of companies involved in operations related to communications services or communications equipment. Securities of both U.S. and non-U.S. companies may find a place in this non-diversified fund. FSTCX currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 and has a one-month return of 5.1%. Annual expense ratio of 0.82% is lower than the category average of 1.47%. Fifth – Utilities gained 1.2% American Century Utilities Fund (MUTF: BULIX ) invests the majority of its assets in equities related to the utility industry. The fund’s portfolio is based on qualitative and quantitative management techniques. In the quantitative process, stocks are ranked on their growth and valuation features. BULIX currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 and has a one-month return of 7.3%. Annual expense ratio of 0.67% is lower than the category average of 1.25%. Original Post