Tag Archives: author

How To Find The Best Style ETFs: Q3’15

Summary The large number of ETFs hurts investors more than it helps as too many options become paralyzing. Performance of an ETFs holdings are equal to the performance of an ETF. Our coverage of ETFs leverages the diligence we do on each stock by rating ETFs based on the aggregated ratings of their holdings. Finding the best ETFs is an increasingly difficult task in a world with so many to choose from. How can you pick with so many choices available? Don’t Trust ETF Labels There are at least 67 different All Cap Blend ETFs and at least 281 ETFs across twelve styles. Do investors need 23+ choices on average per style? How different can the ETFs be? Those 67 All Cap Blend ETFs are very different. With anywhere from 4 to 3794 holdings, many of these All Cap Blend ETFs have drastically different portfolios, creating drastically different investment implications. The same is true for the ETFs in any other style, as each offers a very different mix of good and bad stocks. Large Cap Value ranks first for stock selection. Small Cap Blend ranks last. Details on the Best & Worst ETFs in each style are here . A Recipe for Paralysis By Analysis We firmly believe ETFs for a given style should not all be that different. We think the large number of All Cap Blend (or any other) style ETFs hurts investors more than it helps because too many options can be paralyzing. It is simply not possible for the majority of investors to properly assess the quality of so many ETFs. Analyzing ETFs, done with the proper diligence, is far more difficult than analyzing stocks because it means analyzing all the stocks within each ETF. As stated above, that can be as many as 3794 stocks, and sometimes even more, for one ETF. Any investor worth his salt recognizes that analyzing the holdings of an ETF is critical to finding the best ETF. Figure 1 shows our top rated ETF for each style. Note that there are no ETFs currently under coverage in the All Cap Growth or All Cap Value styles. Figure 1: The Best ETF in Each Style (click to enlarge) Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings How to Avoid “The Danger Within” Why do you need to know the holdings of ETFs before you buy? You need to be sure you do not buy an ETF that might blow up. Buying an ETF without analyzing its holdings is like buying a stock without analyzing its business and finances. No matter how cheap, if it holds bad stocks, the ETF’s performance will be bad. Don’t just take my word for it, see what Barron’s says on this matter. PERFORMANCE OF ETF’S HOLDINGS = PERFORMANCE OF ETF If Only Investors Could Find Funds Rated by Their Holdings The Arrow QVM Equity Factor (NYSEARCA: QVM ) is the top-rated Large Cap Blend ETF and the overall best ETF of the 281 style ETFs that we cover. The worst ETF in Figure 1 is the State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth (NYSEARCA: SLYG ), which gets a Neutral rating. One would think ETF providers could do better for this style. Disclosure: David Trainer and Max Lee receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, style, or theme. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Paladin Energy Is Trying To Survive

Summary Paladin could be breaking even this year, as it will be able to reduce its production costs per pound of uranium at Langer Heinrich. However, the main unknowns here are the overhead costs and the expenses to keep its Kaleyekera mine on care and maintenance. Paladin bought more time with its debt restructuring, but the clock is ticking and a higher uranium price would be very welcome. Introduction As the current glut in the uranium market will have to end sooner rather than later, I am keeping my fingers on the pulse of some uranium companies to make sure I’m making an informed decision when I’m ready to sharply increase my exposure to this commodity. Paladin Energy (OTCPK: PALAF ) has released its full-year financial results and has updated its outlook for the current financial year, so it could be a very interesting moment to check up on how the company is doing. Source: annual report Paladin Energy has more liquid listings on both the Toronto Stock Exchange and the Australian Stock Exchange, and I’d recommend to trade on the ASX. The ticker symbol there is PDN and the average daily volume is a pretty decent 9 million shares. The current market capitalization is approximately $230M, so its market cap is almost twice as high as the information page on Seeking Alpha would want to make you believe. The full-year financial results are showing the impact of selling uranium at the spot price Paladin has produced 5.04 million pounds of uranium and has sold almost 5.4 million pounds as it had some uranium in inventory which it sold during the financial year. Unfortunately, Paladin has not entered into any long-term contracts and it was definitely feeling the pain of the low uranium price on the spot market as the average received price was just $37/lbs for a total revenue of $199M . Source: financial statements This resulted in a gross profit of just $1.8M as Paladin also had to record an $8M impairment charge on the value of its inventory as the uranium price continued to decrease. The after-tax net loss was a stunning $300M and this was predominantly caused by a $240M impairment charge (of which $1M was attributed to an aircraft). I’m a little bit relieved the net loss was mainly caused by an impairment charge as that’s a non-cash charge and shouldn’t have an impact on the cash flow numbers. Source: financial statements So, let’s have a look at those cash flow statements; unfortunately, the situation doesn’t look much better here as the operating cash flow was negative, resulting in a total negative free cash flow of $40M. Keep in mind the cash flow statements exclude the impact of an impairment charge so there are no excuses at all here. What will Paladin do different this year? The company has now just one mine which is still in production, Langer Heinrich in Namibia. The mine will produce approximately 5-5.4 million pounds of uranium in the current financial year so there might be a small production increase, but the impact will be minimal. However, there will be an impact on the total production rate attributable to Paladin Energy, as the company sold a 25% stake in Langer Heinrich to a Chinese consortium for $190M last year. This cash infusion was be very welcome, but it also means Paladin is giving up on a lot of future potential cash flow. Langer Heinrich has a total resource estimate of 150 million pounds, so the company has sold 37.5 million pounds for $190M, or just $5 per pound. This decision is understandable, as it needed to improve the balance sheet, but should the received price per pound of uranium increase to $50+ again, Paladin might regret the sale. Paladin expects the production cost per pound to decrease by 7-14% to $26/lbs, but despite an uranium price of $35/lbs, this doesn’t mean the company will be free cash flow positive. There still is an ongoing cost of approximately $12-15M per year, which equals approximately $4 per attributable pound of uranium produced at Langer Heinrich. Throw in an additional $20M for exploration and administration (another $5/lbs) and you clearly see Paladin needs an uranium price of approximately $35-38/lbs to be able to even start thinking about breaking even. And that will be a difficult task in FY2016. Don’t get me wrong, it is possible as Paladin expects to receive a premium of $4/lbs over the spot price, but you surely shouldn’t expect any miracles from Paladin this year. Investment thesis Paladin’s re-financing activities in the past financial year have reduced the pressure on the balance sheet, but Paladin has just bought some more time, as it doesn’t look like the company will be able to generate a substantial amount of free cash flow in the current financial year, which could have been used to reduce the net debt. Paladin is a leveraged play on the uranium price and there will be a huge difference between a uranium price of $35/lbs and $50/lbs as, at the latter price, Paladin should be generating a pretty decent amount of free cash flow. Editor’s Note: This article covers one or more stocks trading at less than $1 per share and/or with less than a $100 million market cap. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Asia-Pacific ETFs To Watch On A Surprise Rebound

The Asian stock market rallied offering some respite to investors suffering from the global economic slowdown triggered by uneasiness in China. Thanks largely go to the optimistic remarks made by the Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and China’s Ministry of Finance regarding strong stimulus measures that would stir up their economies. Abe revealed plans to cut the corporate tax rate in 2016 by at least 3.3 percentage points to attract investors into the country. This led the Nikkei index at the Tokyo Stock Exchange to rise 7.7% in the afternoon trading session on Wednesday, the biggest one-day gain since October 2008. Notably, the index shed 2.4% in the previous trading session. China’s Ministry of Finance also boosted investor confidence after it promised to reform the tax system, step up investor spending and utilize the public-private-partnership model to support economic growth. Soon after this announcement, the Shanghai Composite Index rose 2.3% while Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index moved up 4.1% Wednesday. This extended the continued rebound from Tuesday, when both the Shanghai and Hong Kong indexes gained 2.9% and 3.3%, respectively. The rebound in the Asian market was also supported by a strong rally in the Wall Street and European indexes Tuesday. The U.S. markets recovered from its second-worst week of the year with Dow Jones, S&P 500 and Nasdaq moving up 2.4%, 2.5% and 2.8%, respectively. Meanwhile, Germany’s benchmark DAX index ended up 1.6% higher and London’s FTSE 100 index closed 1.2% higher, driven by promising import and export data from Germany. The top U.S. equities ETFs, SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ), Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (NYSEARCA: DIA ) and PowerShares QQQ Trust (NASDAQ: QQQ ), deserve special mention as they’ve captured the rebound in the global market. Tuesday, SPY, DIA and QQQ gained a respective 2.5%, 2.4% and 2.8% after losing 1.6%, 1.6% and 1.2%, respectively, in the previous trading session. Some of the Asia-Pacific ETFs that can continue its rally from Tuesday riding on the recent upbeat data are iShares MSCI Taiwan (NYSEARCA: EWT ), iShares MSCI South Korea Capped (NYSEARCA: EWY ), Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (NYSEARCA: VPL ) and iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan (NASDAQ: AAXJ ). Tuesday, EWT gained 3.2%, EWY rose 2.5%, VPL went up 2.9% and AAXJ moved up 4%, after posting losses in the prior session. All these ETFs have a decent Zacks Rank of 3 or ‘Hold’ rating with a Medium risk outlook. Despite the gains, investors should be a little cautious about the rebound in the global markets given the underlying weakness in China. The U.S. Federal Reserve’s move regarding short-term interest rates in its next week’s meeting also poses questions regarding the overall health of the market. Original Post