Tag Archives: author

SPY Vs. Dividend Growth Portfolio

A couple of weeks ago, I asked you why you think you can beat professionals? This led to an interesting conversation about the difference between beating the market and reaching your goals. I think the most important thing is to reach your financial goals. It’s like registering for a run; when you register for a 10K, you don’t mind if you win the run or not; you focus on your own running objective. As long as you reach that goal, your run is a success. This is also a good mentality to apply when investing. After writing this article, I received an email from a reader asking the question about the difference between buying SPY (Spider S&P 500 ETF index) yielding nearly 2% and building a dividend growth stock portfolio: More often than not, I choose not to buy individual stocks when I compare their yield to SPY, which is a core holding in my account. Can you perhaps do a write-up of SPY? It has all the same advantages a good dividend stock has. It has dividend growth, it has a reasonable yield, dividends reinvested in SPY will have the same snowball effect. But, it has a KEY advantage that individual stocks do not – diversification. So how can I determine if an individual stock is a better buy than SPY? When is the decision to to buy an individual stock for its dividend better than my default position of “keep it in SPY”? What return should an individual stock give me for the risk of abandoning SPY’s diversification? What risk premium? I found his question quite interesting as it positioned a global well-diversified and dividend paying investment vehicle trading with very little effort vs. a handpicked dividend growth stock portfolio requiring continuous management. Let’s dig deeper to see what both strategies have to offer… SPY is Not a Dividend Growth Portfolio First, let’s be honest, SPY is not a dividend growth portfolio. This is not its function, regardless if the members of the S&P 500 pay enough dividends to have a yield around 2%. When you look at its past 10 year dividend history payment, you understand better why SPY can’t really replace a dividend growth portfolio: As you can see, dividend payments are quite hectic. This is normal as within the group of the 500 biggest companies, you will have a little bit of everything: Strong growth companies not paying dividend Classic dividend growth companies Companies going through troubles and cutting their dividend Etc. Being a “big company” is not a gauge of success and it is also far from an indication you will see your dividend payments growing. It becomes obvious when you compare the dividend growth in % over the past 10 years compared to a classic dividend growth company such as Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ ): JNJ dividend payments increased steadily year after year and offer double the dividend growth payment than SPY over this period. Besides the dividend growth test fail, there are many other reasons why I’m not a big fan in investing in SPY as a dividend growth investor: It doesn’t follow my dividend growth investing philosophy. Dividend payments are hectic. SPY includes too many “bad companies” I wouldn’t pick. The overall market is not what I want to buy. In the end, there are very limited similarities between a dividend growth portfolio and SPY. The dividend yield may confuse investors, but don’t fall in the trap; if you are looking for a dividend growth investing vehicle, SPY is not the one . What About a Dividend ETF Then? One question leading to another, I wanted to finish this article with a comparison of a dividend growth ETF vs. a handpicked dividend growth portfolio. I’m all about efficiency in life and if I could spend a big three minutes to initiate a transaction in a dividend growth ETF and forget about my investing strategy for the rest of my life, I would gain several hours each year to do other things than manage my portfolio and reading about the stock market. Let’s take the Vanguard Appreciation ETF (NYSEARCA: VIG ) dividend growth and compare it to JNJ again: I’ve taken the five-year view as there were unrealistic increases back in 2007 (dividends doubled within three quarters) and it wasn’t giving a good comparable. Still, even by using the five-year dividend growth period, we can see how JNJ shows a pure and systematic dividend increase while the VIG payment increase is quite hectic. Nonetheless, VIG dividend payment growth is double that of JNJ, one of the most appreciated dividend growth companies on the market. As far as stock price goes, we are at the same pace: In other words; while VIG dividend growth is hectic, any investor would have been better with the ETF than with JNJ. However, it is unfair to compare a diversified ETF with a single company. This is why I did the exercise with my top 10 dividend growth stocks as a portfolio vs. the same ETF: Unfortunately, I can’t perfectly compared this growth portfolio with the VIG as not all data can be used in 2011 and Disney (NYSE: DIS ) decided to pay dividends twice per year instead of once a year explaining the virtual drop on the graph (but it will go back up once the year ends as a second dividend payment will be issue. One thing you can see is that the dividend payment for most companies is steadily increasing without any big jump (besides BlackRock (NYSE: BLK ) in 2011). However, I can compare the price evolution of the portfolio: The average stock price gain is 114.65%, more than double the VIG. Conclusion The conclusion of using ETFs vs. handpicked dividend stocks is similar to the conclusion of my previous post: First and foremost; as long as you reach your financial goals – you probably have the right method, Second; market index ETFs such as SPY are too wide to represent a dividend growth investing strategy. They are good products, but not for dividend investors, Third; similar to market index ETFs, dividend ETFs often includes a too wide number of companies. Handpicked dividend growth stocks, if done wisely, can beat such products. In order to make sure my investment strategy works, I use the VIG as a benchmark. So far, I’m very happy with my results and they justify the efforts I make to manage my portfolio. I think dividend ETFs can help you achieve your financial goals as well if you are not interested in taking the time to manage your own portfolio but still wish to invest in a vehicle paying dividends. Then again; there are no right answers besides the one that makes you comfortable with your financial objectives!

The Making Of A Value Investor: The 2015 Edition

Summary Looking back at the last 18 months this is what I learned, in the order I wish I learned it. I discuss my thoughts on: framework, where to search for stocks, how to analyze them, portfolio sizing, etc. I share some of my favorite books and Seeking Alpha authors. I started my quest to becoming an investor during the Summer of 2014. Since then, I have read countless books, chosen financial markets as my major, met multiple hedge fund managers, became a contributor for Seeking Alpha, and most importantly started investing. Along the way I have learned much. Looking back at the last 18 months, I asked myself, if I had to do it all again, where would I start? This is my best answer, my try at a roadmap, and a few lessons I learned along the way. If I learn as much in the next year, I will be satisfied. I hope this will be helpful to readers just starting out. I also hope it will help readers get to know me as a Contributor. I. A Value Investor’s Framework. Warren Buffett’s notoriety helped me get started. As I was facing the mountain of information available in books and online, it was extremely overwhelming to figure out where to start. So I picked Buffett. My rationale was straightforward: This guy obviously figured it out, so what are his tricks? What are his secrets? Quickly enough I was led to Graham’s book: The intelligent investor. You’ll meet very few people with an interest in the stock market who will admit to not having read the book. Everyone has an opinion on it too: some say it is the cornerstone of value investing. Others say it’s outdated, and that there is no such thing as net-net anymore. I read it. The real lessons were in between the lines. The magical secret that I thought would make me a zillionaire by the end of the month didn’t exist. My key takeaway is that being a successful investor is function of your state of mind more than the tools at your disposal. Source: Sheknows.com If you don’t understand value investing in 5 minutes, you never will. – Ben Graham Simple, but it is a concept which is at the core of value investing and my beliefs as an investor: Buy something for less than it’s worth. The difficulty resides, of course, in determining how much something is worth. For that you will need several tools, and you will need to think in a way most people don’t. As such, being a value investor doesn’t apply only to stocks, but to buying groceries, shopping for clothes, and how you choose to spend your time. The eternal question is: Am I getting more than I’m giving? You can’t do the same things others do and expect to outperform. Unconventionality shouldn’t be a goal in itself, but rather a way of thinking. – Howard Marks. This is an oversimplification of the framework within which I have chosen to analyze the markets and securities. Here are my favorite books for anyone who wants to embrace this mentality and view of the world. Howard Marks: The Most Important Thing Seth Klarman: Margin of Safety George Clason: The Richest Man In Babylon George Soros: The Soros Lectures II. Where To Look For Securities? Source: Featurepicks Understanding the framework is one thing, operating within it is when the fun starts. If we group together all securities listed on the NYSE, Nasdaq and TMX Group, there were a total of 9012 as of January 2015. It is unlikely that any of us will ever have time to sift through all of them to find a mispriced gem. As such, we must find places where there might be a structural or emotional reason which justifies a discrepancy between price and value. In a market there must be a buyer for every seller, and a seller for every buyer, and understanding what motivates your counterparty is key. Try to imagine what the person on the other side of the trade was thinking. – Leon Levy It is Seeking Alpha’s contributor Chris Demuth Jr. who first got me to think this way. He takes pride in ” looking for non-economic counterparties “. There are many places one can search to reduce the amount of securities you need to look at to find an opportunity: worst performing stocks on any given daily session, spinoffs, mergers, upcoming inclusions or recent exclusion of major indices, articles in Wall Street Journal or Barrons (If you are going to subscribe make sure you get a discount, and once the discount is up call them to cancel, they will give you another), people you talk to, and authors on Seeking Alpha. You want to be looking in places where any of these apply: Your counterparty is panicking, and you can provide the liquidity they need at the price you want. Your counterparty isn’t looking, maybe there is no or little Wall Street/Bay Street coverage? Your counterparty doesn’t have a choice, like an S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) having to sell all of their position in the 500th stock when it becomes the 501st largest stock. Or like dividend funds having to sell their position when a company cuts the dividend, or spins off a division. What gets us into trouble is not what we don’t know. It’s what we know for sure that just ain’t so. – Mark Twain Flip the question, what does your counterparty know, that just ain’t so? There are three books I would recommend you read to help you find the best people to buy and sell from. Joel Greenblatt: You Can Be A Stock Market Genius Leon Levy: The Mind Of Wall Street Ken Fisher: The Only Three Questions That Still Matter Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal. – T.S. Eliot Here on Seeking Alpha, we are lucky enough to have among us some great minds. Sift through different authors, find authors who have a style you like. Think for yourself, but feel free to steal ideas, trust me the stocks don’t care whether your hard work found the opportunity or someone else’s did. These are my 3 favorite authors, but based on your style, there are many others which can offer you what you need. In no particular order: Also, look up value funds in your town. Send them an email, have a chat, ask questions, build relationships. Motivate your friends into learning more about investing, you’ll be doing them a favor. Everyone you know with a common interest in investing might have a great idea for you. III. How To Analyze The Stocks You Find? Source: Crossfitinvasion Once you have found a security with a reason to justify its mispricing, you will want to figure out what is the company worth. As an investor you will come to look at stocks as companies, not as lottery tickets. In doing so you will have to analyze companies’ business models and industries. It might seem like a daunting task and you might not have access to professional industry reports (I don’t), but a few quick searches on Google will help you gain the insights you need. Warren Buffett says he looks for companies which have large moats around them, companies whose returns on invested capital remains above their cost of capital for a long period of time. You will also want to analyze the management and strategy of the companies. To help you understand great business models and great management, there are two books which I recommend: Michael Porter: Competitive Advantage Mckinsey: Value, The Four Cornerstones of Corporate Finance. You will gain many insights from reading biography type books of successful investors. Time Horizon is a framework for patience. The two are almost the same thing but the first helps with the second. Knowledge and time horizon team up so you can more easily be patient. – Frederick Kobrick I enjoyed these: Peter Lynch: Beating the Street Mark Stevens: King Icahn Frederick Kobrick: The Big Money Peter Cundill: There’s Always Something To Do Obviously you will need to have a working knowledge of corporate finance, accounting principles, and valuation models. I use comparable ratio analysis as a guide to how a company fares against the competition. I will question any discrepancies in multiples within an industry to understand why some companies command higher relative prices than others. There usually is a good reason. I will also perform a DCF valuation of stocks I analyze. My thoughts on such models are mixed, since the output is only function of the inputs. Bullsh*t in, Bullsh*t out. When I talked to Natcan’s previous CEO Pascal Duquette, he told me of a time when he had to value an oil rig which was privately owned by a fund he worked for during his career. He had all the information, from the number of workers, to the amount of planned production. After just two years, his previsions of earnings were off 25% because one input hadn’t been correctly modeled. On the other hand a business’s value is equal to the present value of the future cashflows the business will generate, so you can’t ignore the model. The way I proceed is by reverse engineering the DCF. Assuming constant margins, what revenue growth is required to justify today’s price? Is such growth attainable? If not, what kind of margin improvement will be necessary at a lower growth rate to justify today’s price? Once again, is it achievable? From there I’ll use my judgment, are the assumptions priced into the security underestimating its potential, or overestimating it? By how much? Are they being underestimated enough that even if my conservative estimate is off, the security is still mispriced? Thinking as an investor, means creating a distribution of potential outcomes in your mind. If X, Y or Z happens, what does it mean for the price of the security? How likely are X Y or Z? What is the weighted value of the security for these given outcomes? It is an approximate exercise, but it’s the best we have. It’s what Howard Marks would call “second level thinking”. IV. How Many Securities Should You Buy? Source: icollector Now we come to portfolio allocation. I have to say, I’m unimpressed by Markowitz’s portfolio theory, and most of modern finance’s theory of investing. They teach us how markets should be, not how they really are. The single reason ultimate diversification doesn’t work, is that in times of crisis, correlations go to one, and you lose as much money as everyone else. As for eliminating firm specific risk, the consequence is also eliminating firm specific return. Risk doesn’t lie in the volatility of returns, but comes from the operations of the companies in which you invest in, and the price you paid for those companies. So how many stocks should you buy? It depends. It depends on your goals, on your aversion to losing money. I have met with the money managers from different firms, here are a few who have different outlooks: Brian Pinchuk from Lorne Steinberg Wealth Management , this value firm believes in investing no more than 3% of the portfolio in an individual security. Patrick Theniere, from Barrage Capital who believes in concentrated portfolios with stocks taking up as much as 10-15% of the portfolio. Paul Beattie from BT Global Growth , who has a couple dozen positions long and short. All three are successful money managers and have good track records, so there is no one size fits all answer. On one hand, if you have a stock go up 50% when it is only 1% of your portfolio, it will only represent a .5% gain for your portfolio, on the other hand a 50% loss on a 10% position is a 5% loss for your portfolio. I believe Ken Fisher summed it up when he said: Don’t aim to beat your benchmark by more than you are comfortable lagging it. No matter how many stocks you choose to buy, give yourself the chance to initially be wrong on the price you pay to double down several times to reduce your price. I adhere to Chris Demuth’s outlook on portfolio sizing which you can read more about here . V. Measuring Your Performance. Source: Rowealth You will also choose how to measure your performance. Are you aiming for absolute performance, or to beat a benchmark? Even if your goal is absolute performance, you will be confronted to comparing yourself to the benchmark. Why? Because if after several years you are unable to do better than an appropriate benchmark, why not spare all the effort and just invest in an ETF? You have to admit, over a long period of time it seems like a decent idea. SPY data by YCharts On the other hand I smirk every time I read a fund manager says he is happy because this year he delivered a performance of -10% whereas the S&P 500 did -20%. Yes it seems tough to deliver absolute returns during bad years for the markets, and I don’t claim to be able to do so, time will tell. Ultimately I’m seeking to perform on an absolute basis, as should all individual investors who are investing with the goal of spending that money someday. The problem with trying to beat the market is that many money managers have become closet indexers during the years. The question for these people is no longer: Do I want to own Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ) or not at these prices? The question becomes: Should I overweight or underweight Apple relative to its weighting in the index? For me, this just isn’t intelligent investing. VI. Don’t Be Afraid To Share Your Ideas. Source: Wordpress Once you start to analyze stocks and find ones you would like to own, why not share your ideas on Seeking Alpha? One thing we all have in common here, from contributors, to readers, is we want to find great stocks for our portfolio. Writing articles here will help you put your ideas on pen and paper, the editorial team will help you go further on parts of your analysis you might have overlooked, and confronting comments will help you think of your thesis in a different way. Like everyone you are going to have some dogs in your portfolio, and it will be easy for you to blame it on the market or on bad management or whatever, but having your bad picks publicly available on Seeking Alpha will force you to question where you went wrong. I for example, recommended buying Volkswagen earlier this year. Not so great looking back, and rather than just shrug it off, I’ve learned that I should be weary of companies with obscure corporate structures since it creates opportunities for management to employ devious practices. VII. Final Words. I look forward to everyone’s comments, please feel free to confront me on anything you disagree with, constructive criticism is always welcome. If you liked this article, please consider following me on Seeking Alpha. Also in this article I gave a list of my favorite books. The price of these books quickly adds up. My tip to saving money on books was buying a kindle reader. You can get their latest tablet for $50. Kindle books are usually a bit cheaper, but subscribing to Scribd was my favorite way of reading all these books cheaply. I have no business with them but the subscription costs $10 a month, and if you use this link you’ll get two months free (No I’m not getting compensated for this.)

Dividend Growth Stock Overview: NextEra Energy

About NextEra Energy NextEra Energy (NYSE: NEE ) generates, distributes and sells electricity to customers in 27 states and Canada. The bulk of the company’s customers are in Florida, served by its subsidiary Florida Power & Light Company. In addition to Florida Power & Light, NextEra Energy operates subsidiaries that generate renewable energy, provide electricity service to locations in Texas and New Hampshire, and sell fiber optic telecommunications services around the United States. The company employs nearly 14,000 people, and is headquartered in Juno Beach, Florida. Nearly 5 million customers are served by Florida Power & Light, which has 25,100 megawatts (MW) of electrical generation capacity. Over 90% of FPL’s capacity comes from natural gas and nuclear power. Based on 2014 figures (the latest year that’s available), over half of the operating revenues come from residential accounts, and another 36% come from commercial accounts. While wholesale revenues account for only 3% of the total, wholesale revenues were negligible as recently as 2012. NextEra Energy prides itself on using renewable power generation sources, and its promotional materials tout this effort; however, FPL’s two solar generation facilities provide only 35 MW of capacity. The company’s other major subsidiary is NextEra Energy Capital Holdings, Inc., which owns NextEra Energy Resources (NEE Resources) and NextEra Energy Transmission, LLC (NEET). NEE Resources is a wholesale generator of power and operates NextEra Energy’s competitive energy businesses (as opposed to its rate-regulated businesses). It also conducts energy-related commodity marketing and trading activities to mitigate risks from fluctuations in energy prices. NEET owns and operates two subsidiaries of its own, Lone Star and NHT, which provide rate regulated electricity service in parts of Texas and New Hampshire, respectively. NEET also owns FPL FiberNet, which leases internet network capacity to customers in Texas, New Hampshire and parts of the south-central United States. In 2014, NextEra Energy posted total income of nearly $2.5 billion on revenues of $17.0 billion. 60% of the total income was provided by Florida Power & Light, with the remaining 40% coming from NEE Resources. Earnings per share were $5.60 in 2014; NextEra Energy recently reaffirmed full-year 2015 earnings in the upper half of a range of $5.40-5.70, which translates into a year-over-year increase of between 1% and 2%. Based on the current dividend of $3.08, the company’s payout ratio is 56%. It expects to compound EPS at 6-8% a year through 2018, and is projecting EPS of $5.85-6.35 in 2016 and $6.60-7.10 in 2017. NextEra Energy has a share repurchase program that was authorized in February 2005 and reaffirmed in July 2011. Its repurchase activity is sporadic. The initial authorization in 2005 was for 20 million shares, and over a decade the company has repurchased less than 7 million shares. As of December 2014, 13.3 million shares, representing 2.9% of the outstanding shares, remained on the program. The company is a member of the S&P 500 index and trades under the ticker symbol NEE. As a member of the S&P 500, once NextEra Energy has increased dividends for 25 consecutive years, S&P will classify the company as an S&P Dividend Aristocrat. Given that NextEra has made a conscious effort to increase its dividend each year for 21 years straight, I expect the company to continue to do so. This would put it on track to become a Dividend Aristocrat at the beginning of 2020. NextEra Energy’s Dividend and Stock Split History (click to enlarge) NextEra Energy has compounded its dividend at 8% over the last decade. It has paid dividends since at least 1983, and has increased them since 1995. The company announces annual dividend increases in mid-February, with the stock going ex-dividend at the end of February. In February 2015, NextEra Energy announced a 6.2% dividend increase to an annualized rate of $3.08 per share. The company should announce its 22nd consecutive annual dividend increase in February 2016. Historically, NextEra Energy has increased dividends in the mid-single digits, but over the past few years, it has increased the growth rate. Over the last 5 years, it has compounded its dividend at 9.02%, while over the past 10 and 20 years, the company has compounded the dividend at 8.05% and 6.46%, respectively. The company has split its stock twice. The splits, both 2-for-1, occurred in January 1985 and March 2005. A single share purchased prior to January 1985 would have split into 4 shares. Over the 5 years ending on June 30, 2015, NextEra Energy stock appreciated at an annualized rate of 19.0%, from a split-adjusted $46.00 to $95.23. This outperformed the 15.0% compounded return of the S&P 500 index over the same period. NextEra Energy’s Direct Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plans The company has both direct purchase and dividend reinvestment plans. You must already be an investor in NextEra Energy to participate in the plans; if you own the stock in your brokerage account, you’ll have to have it transferred into your name in order to join the plans. The minimum investment for additional direct purchases is $100, and the dividend reinvestment plan allows for full or partial reinvestment of dividends. The plans’ fees structures are favorable for investors. Depending on the source of the shares purchased – and, unfortunately, you’ll have no control over that – you’ll pay a maximum of 3 cents per share purchased if they’re purchased off the open market; there’s no charge if the shares are purchased directly from NextEra Energy. When you sell your shares, you’ll pay a transaction fee of either $15 or $25 (depending on the type of sell order) plus a commission of 12 cents per share. You’ll also get charged an additional $15 if you go through a phone agent to sell your shares. All fees will be deducted from the sales proceeds. Helpful Links NextEra Energy’s Investor Relations Website Current quote and financial summary for NextEra Energy (finviz.com) Information on the direct purchase and dividend reinvestment plans for NextEra Energy Disclosure: I do not currently have, nor do I plan to take positions in NEE.