Tag Archives: author

Has The ‘Smart Money’ Or The ‘Dumb Money’ Been Reducing Risk?

Riskier assets have been buckling clear across the asset board. Comfort seeking in treasury bonds over low-level investment grade bonds and higher-yielding junk bonds? A preference for recession-proof staples over the wider large-cap asset class? These are signs that momentum currently favors less risky alternatives. History has rarely been kind to those who ignore common sense warning signs. Is it the “smart money” or the “dumb money” that has been seeking safer portfolio pastures throughout 2015? Time itself will tell. That said, riskier assets have been buckling clear across the asset board. Consider the iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: IEF ): iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: HYG ) price ratio. A rising IEF:HYG price ratio signals an increasing desire for the perceived safety of U.S. treasuries over the higher yield-producing income of comparable corporates. The ratio has not been this high since mid-2014. Another relationship that typically offers insight into investor risk preferences is the Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (NYSEARCA: XLP ):SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) price ratio. When there is skittishness about the economy, cigarette makers, soda pop providers and toothpaste purveyors tend to outperform the broader large-cap market of U.S. stocks. As it stands, momentum for XLP relative to SPY is near 52-week highs. Comfort seeking in treasury bonds over low-level investment grade bonds and higher-yielding junk bonds? A preference for recession-proof staples over the wider large-cap asset class? These are signs that momentum currently favors less risky alternatives. Indeed, there are plenty of additional examples where the less risky asset is outperforming the riskier selection. Compare the perceived safer world of large-company stocks versus the perceived riskiness of owning small-company stocks via the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: IVV ):iShares Russell 2000 ETF (NYSEARCA: IWM ). Like most price ratio comparisons today, the lower risk option is experiencing far greater demand than the higher risk option. There are exceptions to the rule. For example, in foreign markets, large caps are underperforming small caps. This can be seen in the Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (NYSEARCA: VEU ): Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (NYSEARCA: VSS ) price ratio. One possible reason for the trend toward the perceived riskier asset? Large foreign corporations are exceptionally dependent on international trade; lackluster world demand has put enormous pressure on exporters. In contrast, smaller companies around the globe are more dependent on their local economies as opposed to global trade. Another possible explanation? International small-caps have been beaten down so far that some may perceive them as more attractive from a valuation standpoint. However, relative strength in small-cap international stocks relative to larger-company brethren is not an indication of greater demand for riskier international holdings. In fact, like the overwhelming majority of “risk-on” asset classes, small-cap international stocks via VSS have been faltering since May. In particular, VSS is more than 10% below its 52-week high and remains well below its long-term 200-day moving average. With the U.S. economy showing signs of deceleration and U.S. stocks exhibiting unrestrained overvaluation , few should be caught off guard by waning enthusiasm for risk taking. One fact that looms particularly large? Year-to-date, more stocks in the U.S. have been declining than advancing for the first time since 2009. In sum, history has rarely been kind to those who ignore common sense warning signs. If you have long-term winners in your portfolio, restore those assets or asset classifications back to your original allocation. The cash that you raise from “pruning” will help you buy desirable assets at bargain prices in the future. If you have been holding onto losing vehicles, consider taking a small loss on each. The dollars that you raise from “cutting bait” will help you buy the best fish in the sea when those fish are attractively priced. For Gary’s latest podcast, click here . Disclosure: Gary Gordon, MS, CFP is the president of Pacific Park Financial, Inc., a Registered Investment Adviser with the SEC. Gary Gordon, Pacific Park Financial, Inc, and/or its clients may hold positions in the ETFs, mutual funds, and/or any investment asset mentioned above. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. At times, issuers of exchange-traded products compensate Pacific Park Financial, Inc. or its subsidiaries for advertising at the ETF Expert web site. ETF Expert content is created independently of any advertising relationships.

Azure Power – A Good Way To Play The Secular Growth Of The India Solar Market

Summary The company has been expanding at a CAGR of 135% since May 2012. India offers huge growth potential with the solar market expected to increase to 100 GW by 2022 from around 5 GW now. One of the largest solar power developers in India with a strong pipeline. Azure Power (Pending: AZRE ) is amongst the largest developers and operators of utility scale solar assets in India. The company has committed to install 11,000 MW by 2022 in RE-Invest 2015. Though this target is more for the galleries than the company’s actual target in my view, the company will still grow tremendously even if it achieves a fraction of that figure. Azure Power started in 2008 and is currently present in the Indian solar commercial and utility sectors. The company has also built medium scale solar power projects in the rural parts of India. Currently the company has presence across 11 Indian states, with 242 MW of projects. Azure Power also has strong links with major USA financial institutions, having raised loans from IFC and US EXIM bank. The company is now thinking of doing an IPO in the US to raise $100 million. India is set to expand its solar industry to 100 GW by 2022, from around 5 GW now. Recently the Indian Prime Minister led the International Solar Alliance proposal in the Paris Climate summit, which shows the country’s serious commitment towards solar. India is expected to have a bright solar future and Azure Power should be a good way to play the Indian story. What Azure Power does Azure Power has presence across the utility and commercial segments and is rapidly expanding in rural India. Its top investors currently are IW Green (in which Mr. Inderpreet S. Wadhwa is the sole member), the World Bank’s International Finance Corp, Helion Venture Partners and FC VI India Venture. The company typically enters into 25-year, fixed price PPAs with government agencies and businesses. The company booked $22 million in sales for the 12 months ended June 30, 2015 and has plans to increase its operating capacity to 520 MW by December 2016. (click to enlarge) Extracts of P&L of Azure Power from F-1 filing with SEC Azure Power operates 17 utility scale projects and several commercial rooftop projects across India. The combined rated capacity of solar projects is 242 MW (out of which 18 MW was distributed rooftop solar). Its 100MW solar power plant was commissioned in Rajasthan in March this year and it also completed the first large scale solar plant in Uttar Pradesh in February 2015 The company has a good track record of completing its projects well ahead of the scheduled due dates. Azure Power has a goal to achieve 1GW and 5GW of projects, operating by December 2017 and 2020 respectively. (click to enlarge) “This is the first large scale capacity project operational under the Chhasttisgarh Solar and we are proud to have successfully brought down the cost of power by almost 64 per cent from Rs 17.91 per unit in 2009 to Rs 6.45 today, for this project.” – Inderpreet Wadhwa CEO Source: Indiatimes Project pipeline as of September 2015 Operational States Capacity (in MW) Punjab 36 Gujarat 10 Rajasthan 140 Karnataka 10 Uttar Pradesh 10 Chhattisgarh 30 236 Under Construction Karnataka 140 Andhra Pradesh 50 Rajasthan 5 Bihar 10 Punjab 28 233 Committed Madhya Pradesh 25 Delhi 3 Punjab 150 178 Commercial Rooftop 18 MW Data from Company’s F-1 filing with SEC Azure Power Positives Strong financial backing – The solar power industry is a capital intensive one and requires massive amounts of equity and debt funding. Azure Power has managed to garner both, thanks to its marquee investors. The company recently won a 150 MW order in AP despite stiff competition. A low cost of capital is essential to win and get good returns from solar power projects. In-house EPC – Azure Power is one of the few solar developers in India with an in-house EPC division. This not only allows the company to lower its cost, but also ensures quality components and design. Most other solar developers in India which are backed by PE investors such as Renew Power, get the EPC done from EPC players like L&T, Mahindras etc. This increases their costs and also sometimes may lead to quality issues. India has massive growth potential – The Indian renewable energy market is going to be one of the biggest markets in the world for the next 25 years. India has committed to make 40% of its total power capacity by 2030 to come through green energy sources. This will mean massive opportunities going forward for all solar players. Currently the Indian renewable energy capacity is less than 15%. Risks Although Azure Power looks promising and has executed well, the company has never been profitable in its limited operating history since 2008. Net losses amounted to $17 million for fiscal year 2015. Other problems common to independent power producers in India are related to land acquisition, regulatory delays and evacuation issues. Though India looks well committed on its target to attain 100 GW by 2022, the company’s profitability will further be affected if India is unable to meet its announced targeted capacity. Another major risk being faced by solar power developers is the increasing competition which has led to very low tariffs being bid in auctions. SBG Cleantech and SunEdison (NYSE: SUNE ) recently won solar tenders with an incredibly low price near 7 cents/kWh, which has been considered as risky by some market analysts. Azure Power which also wins projects through these tenders has to bid low in order to win new projects. US-based SunEdison Inc’s aggressive bid for the tender of 500 megawatts (MW) capacity offered under the Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission (NSM) in Andhra Pradesh has seen India’s solar power tariff touch a record-low of Rs.4.63 per kWh (kilowatt-hour)…Some industry experts raised concerns over the viability of such an aggressive tariff, arguing it could result in further aggressive bids in the auction in Rajasthan-to be held later this year for a capacity of 420MW-given the lower solar park charges in the state compared with Andhra Pradesh. NTPC had invited bids from interested parties to participate in July. Source – LiveMint Conclusion Azure Power is one of India’s largest solar power producers with a massive expansion plan. The company has been considering a listing since June this year . It was one of the first players to enter the solar power generation in India. It has a leading market share in India with a good track record in project development across utility scale, commercial rooftop and micro-grids projects. There are no Indian renewable energy stocks listed on NYSE and Azure Power could be a good investment opportunity, given the massive solar installations the country is going to witness. I would look to invest in Azure Power given that the valuation is reasonable.

Oil Prices- The Asset Allocation Perspective

We see meaningful contagion, should an unexpected decline in oil prices spill over to equity and credit markets. We usually see lower energy prices as a net positive for riskier assets such as equities and high-yield bonds. Despite the recent declines in energy prices, we maintain our modest overweight to equity and high-yield bonds. With oil prices continuing to fall we have been spending an increasing amount of time analyzing and debating the impact of lower energy prices on our portfolios. In the short term our main concern is that we see meaningful contagion, should a sharp and largely unexpected decline in oil prices spill over to equity and credit markets, resulting in a significant “risk-off” event. To some extent we have seen that happen over the last few months, but considering that West Texas Intermediate (NYSE: WTI ) Oil has declined 40% since June 30, the impact on U.S. equities and credit markets has been relatively modest so far. The closing of a mutual fund last week – Third Avenue’s Focused Credit Fund – received a significant amount of media coverage and has continued to spook the markets this week. But we must be careful not to apply what happened to this specific fund to the broader credit markets. Specific to the Third Avenue fund, it was modest in size and held a significantly greater amount of distressed assets than the vast majority of dedicated high-yield bond funds. So while risks are no doubt elevated, we think the probability of a full-blown credit crisis remains relatively low. But if oil falls further from already low levels, the potential for contagion increases. As asset allocators with a long time horizon (strategic time horizons of 10+ years and tactical horizons of 12 to 18+ months), we usually see lower energy prices as a net positive for riskier assets such as equities and high-yield bonds, particularly for countries that are net importers such as the U.S. and most of developed Europe and Asia. The argument is that gasoline prices act like a consumer tax: when prices decline consumers will spend more, stimulating the economy. Yet the speed of the decline is increasingly concerning, as is the fact that the credit market is structured differently than it was during other periods when oil dropped quickly. Two of these structural differences in the credit markets concern us. First, dealers are holding significantly less inventory as a percentage of total issuance. This is the result of post-crisis regulation that limits dealers’ ability to be the source of liquidity to the extent they were in the past. Secondly, the credit sector is much more exposed to energy today than in the past. This is the result of the availability of cheap credit over the past several years, combined with expectations that energy prices would remain well above the marginal cost of production. Despite the recent declines in energy prices, we maintain our modest overweight to equity and high-yield bonds. We believe the higher interest rates offered by high-yield bonds compensate investors for this risk. But we remain focused on this issue and re-evaluate our view daily, given the increased volatility in energy prices and the broader markets.