Tag Archives: article

No Sales, No Profits, No Bull: What Happens When Valuations And Central Banks Collide

Total business sales – sales by wholesalers, manufacturers and retailers – have fallen 5% from their July 2014 peak of $1.365 trillion. At $1.296 trillion for January 2016, total business sales have dropped back to where they were in January of 2013 ($1.293 trillion). In fact, the erosion of total sales by American businesses are even uglier when one takes inflation into account. Over the last 20 years, whenever total business sales continued on an upward trajectory, the U.S. economy steered clear of recession. The tech wreck of 2000 and the attacks in September of 2001 resulted in a downward move for business revenue; economic contraction was not far behind. The financial crisis slammed the brakes on business sales in 2008, ushering in The Great Recession; it ended around the same time that businesses began to increase their revenue streams. Might the year-and-a-half long downturn in revenue generation through January of 2016 be an anomaly? Yes and no. Yes, it is certainly possible that we did not hit “peak sales” in July of 2014; rather, the U.S. economy may still find solid footing in the months ahead. On the other hand, take a look what happened to the U.S. dollar via PowerShares DB Dollar Bullish (NYSEARCA: UUP ) beginning in July of 2014. After years of trading near decade lows, the greenback rocketed 25% against major world currencies. The result? U.S. exporters struggled to sell their wares, commodity prices collapsed and foreign stocks never quite recovered. The dollar’s vertical move adversely impacted earnings as well. Consider earnings-per-share (EPS) for the S&P 500. More than half of the profits at S&P 500 corporations emanate from overseas, where significantly devalued currencies hindered the proverbial “bottom line.” Specifically, earnings hit a high water mark in Q3 2014 (July-September). Earnings have been falling ever since. Everything comes back to the dollar’s epic ascent in the third quarter of 2014. Slumping sales. Slumping earnings. Even the top for non-U.S. equities. Take a look at Vanguard FTSE All World ex U.S. (NYSEARCA: VEU ). Between July 1, 2014 and May 21, 2015, the exchange-traded tracker plummeted and recovered. However, it was unable to claim higher ground. Worse yet, VEU has depreciated substantially since the S&P 500 set a record high in May of last year. The effect becomes even more noticeable when we isolate a region like Europe via Vanguard Europe (NYSEARCA: VGK ) or a sovereign like the United Kingdom via iShares United Kingdom (NYSEARCA: EWU ). Whereas U.S. market highs can be traced back to ten-and-a-half months ago (May 21), VGK and EWU have never recovered their July 2014 glory. A cynic might say, “Who cares if most of the world’s equities have been declining for 21 months?” After all, the S&P 500 is within a stone’s throw of recapturing its all-time record (2130) at 2060. Yet one of the reasons for the violent 14% correction of the S&P 500 in January through mid-February was the threat that the dollar would soar to new heights if the Federal Reserve kept its pledge to hike rates four times in 2016. It has since lowered the bar to two, and many believe they’d be lucky to get away with one. Unfortunately, the Fed may be caught in a pickle. Former Dallas Fed president Richard Fisher acknowledges that the institution deliberately created a wealth effect by front-loading a rally in stocks and real estate. The problem with doing so? Wealth effects eventually reverse themselves on the back-end, and the back-end typically begins at valuation extremes. Make no mistake about it. We are sitting on valuation extremes. Based on estimates of as-reported earnings for the S&P 500’s first quarter of 2016 ($89.4), the current price-to-earnings ratio is at 23. Even the non-GAAP, adjusted operating earnings ($100.6) is a lofty 20.5. And low interest rates alone are not a panacea for exorbitant valuation levels. Business sales stagnation. Prolonged profit weakness. And an economy that has been growing at a much slower pace over the last six months (1% or less) – far more lethargic than the 2% growth since the end of the Great Recession? Central banks have the power to prop up asset prices. Nevertheless, asset price reflation can quickly shift to deflation, particularly when revenue and earnings subside. Disclosure: Gary Gordon, MS, CFP is the president of Pacific Park Financial, Inc., a Registered Investment Adviser with the SEC. Gary Gordon, Pacific Park Financial, Inc, and/or its clients may hold positions in the ETFs, mutual funds, and/or any investment asset mentioned above. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. At times, issuers of exchange-traded products compensate Pacific Park Financial, Inc. or its subsidiaries for advertising at the ETF Expert web site. ETF Expert content is created independently of any advertising relationships.

5 Global ETFs Beating SPY In Q1

This has been a pretty rough quarter for the global stock market. China-led shocks, the return of recessionary threats in global superpowers like the Eurozone and Japan, nagging oil worries and a backtracking U.S. economy wreaked havoc on the global economy. The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) also lowered their outlook on global growth. Along with economic slowdown, corporate earnings recession scared investors. Tensions intensified in the U.S. and European financial sectors in the early part of the year. Though market sentiments restored somewhat in March with a slight rebound in oil prices, a raft of positive U.S. economic data and policy easing in foreign shores, the aforementioned headwinds weighed on the bourses in the year-to-date time frame. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) has gained about 0.6% so far this year (as of March 29, 2016), while Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF (NYSEARCA: VGK ) has shed about 2.9% during the same time frame. iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan (NASDAQ: AAXJ ) has added 1.3% and all-world ETF iShares MSCI ACWI (NASDAQ: ACWI ) has gone up by 0.3% (read: Will European ETFs Continue to Underperform SPY? ) However, a few global ETFs have stood out so far in Q1 (with two more days to go). These have beaten the S&P 500 index as well as other global indices by a huge margin. After all, in this period, the ECB broadened its QE policy, BoJ made pro-growth changes in its accommodative policies by introducing negative rates and various economies resorted to rate cuts, which in turn aided the following global ETFs. WisdomTree Commodity Country Equity ETF CCXE (NYSEARCA: CCXE ) The $7.6 million fund looks to track the performance of dividend-paying companies ranked by market capitalization from commodity countries. No stock accounts for more than 5.53% of the portfolio with StatoilHydro ASA, Ambev S.A., and Telecom Corporation of New Zealand Ltd. taking the top three positions. Financials (24.33%), Energy (20.66%), Telecom (12.05%) and Consumer Staples (11.60%) have double-digit weight in the fund. The fund charges 58 bps in fees and has advanced about 8.4% in the year-to-date frame (as of March 29, 2016). AdvisorShares Athena High Dividend ETF (NYSEARCA: DIVI ) This $7.2 million active ETF offers dividend yield of about 4.07%. The fund is heavy on North America (55%) followed by Latin America (23%) and Emerging Asia (16%). None of the stocks accounts for more than 4.25% of the portfolio. The fund is up 7.8% so far this year (read: 3 High Dividend ETFs Under $20 to Watch ). iShares MSCI All Country World Minimum Volatility ETF (NYSEARCA: ACWV ) What could be a more reasonable bet than a minimum volatility ETF in turbulent times? Quite expectedly, ACWV has added 6% so far this year (as of March 29, 2016). This $2.57 billion fund tracks the MSCI All Country World Minimum Volatility Index. Though the ETF provides exposure to low volatility stocks across the globe, U.S. accounts for more than half of the asset base. Apart from this, Japan is the only country with a double-digit allocation. In total, the fund holds 353 stocks with each accounting for no more than 1.48% of the assets. Financials, healthcare, consumer staples, and consumer discretionary are the top four sectors with double-digit allocation each. It charges 20 bps in annual fees (read: Can Low Volatility ETFs Save Your Portfolio from Market Rout? ). SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (NYSEARCA: WDIV ) This fund follows the S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index, which measures the performance of the companies that have raised dividends for at least 10 years consecutively. The $59.2 million product charges an annual fee of 40 bps. WDIV also provides a nice balance across each component with none holding more than 2.45% share. Financials and utilities take the top two spots at 25.2% and 15.3%, respectively. The fund has gained 5.6% so far this year and yields about 4.34% annually. FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure ETF (NYSEARCA: NFRA ) This ETF could be appropriate for investors seeking to play the booming infrastructural activities worldwide. Investors should note that infrastructure is an interest rate sensitive sector, usually with strong yields. Thus, a still-low interest rate environment in the U.S. and rock-bottom interest rates in the Eurozone and Japan made this infrastructure ETF a winner. The fund has exposure to each of these regions with the U.S. holding about 40.3% exposure, followed by Japan with 11.9% share, and 9.7% and 8.3% share taken by Canada and the U.K. respectively. NFRA yields 2.45% annually and has gained 5.42% so far this year (as of March 29, 2016). Original Post