Tag Archives: apple

Eversource Energy Prepares For Earnings Growth By Alleviating The Northeast’s Energy Shortages

Summary Northeast electric and natural gas utility Eversource Energy reported Q2 earnings that beat on both lines by keeping its costs low even as revenue increased. The company is preparing the groundwork for long-term future earnings growth via multiple large capex projects to import additional electricity and natural gas to ease the region’s supply constraints. Its short-term outlook has been hampered by the development of strong El Nino conditions, which will likely cause Q4 and Q1 temperatures in its service area to be warmer than normal. The company’s shares are trading at low valuations, however, and they will be attractively valued if the price falls below 15x future earnings in response to a warm winter. Northeast electric and natural gas utility Eversource Energy (NYSE: ES ) reported Q2 earnings at the end of July that beat on both lines , as the company’s three major segments all reported strong YoY increases to income. Eversource occupies a unique position as a major utility in the U.S. Northeast, which suffers from a lack of natural gas supply infrastructure following the conversion of many of the region’s coal-fired power plants to natural gas. This shortfall causes the price of natural gas, which is finding increasing use in heating applications as well, to experience substantial volatility during the winter as supply is insufficient to meet both heating and electric generation demand. The utility has been undertaking large-scale transmission projects to minimize this volatility while simultaneously selling unattractive generation assets, both of which will support its planned earnings growth. Its share price has fallen YTD despite these moves, however (see figure). This article evaluates Eversource Energy as a potential long investment opportunity. ES data by YCharts Eversource Energy at a glance Formerly known as Northeast Utilities, Eversource Energy took on its current name and ticker symbol in February 2015. The changes followed the utility’s merger with Massachusetts utility NSTAR in April 2012. Headquartered in Hartford, CT, Eversource Energy provides electric and natural gas utility services to a total of 3.6 million customers in Connecticut, New Hampshire, and Massachusetts via multiple regulated subsidiaries (all of which now share the Eversource name). The company’s operations are broadly divided into three segments: electric transmission, electric generation and distribution, and natural gas distribution. Its transmission segment includes 4,270 miles of lines in all three of the states located within its service area. Likewise, its generation and distribution segment, which includes 72,000 miles of distribution lines, also operates in all three states. Finally, the natural gas segment, which includes 6,459 miles of pipeline, operates in Massachusetts and Connecticut. Massachusetts became the largest state by population in the company’s service area following the merger and it now provides for 1.4 million electric customers and 283,000 natural gas customers. Connecticut is close behind with 1.2 million electric customers and 222,000 natural gas customers. New Hampshire, on the other hand, only has 510,000 electric customers. The latter’s small number led Eversource to announce in March 2015 that it intends to sell 1,058 MW of electric generating capacity in the state. The majority of the capacity is coal- and oil-fired and the company determined that, given the relatively small customer base in the state, pending environmental regulations on power plants made their continued ownership by it unattractive. New Hampshire’s governor signed off on the divestiture agreement in July. That said, it remains to be seen whether potential buyers will find the agreement’s terms, which includes requiring the buyer to honor the existing collective bargaining agreement and keep the plants open for 18 months post-acquisition, to be too onerous. Even as it is reducing its exposure to generation (Eversource Energy will continue to distribute purchased electricity to its New Hampshire customers), the company is expanding its natural gas and electric transmission segments. Natural gas and heating oil prices moved in opposite directions following the advent of shale gas extraction, with the former falling to a fraction of the latter’s price. While the recent fall in the price of crude has offset the advantage of natural gas to a large degree, customers in the Northeast have been switching from heating oil to gas in large numbers. Eversource, for example, is targeting 16,000 new natural gas customers annually through 2023 via such conversions. This shift has coincided with a broader move by power plants to abandon coal in favor of natural gas, first due to the latter’s low price and more recently to comply with expanding federal regulations on power plant emissions. Natural gas distribution capacity in the Northeast has not managed to keep up with the combined demand effects of this increased consumption. While sufficient supply is achieved in the summer when heaters aren’t running, natural gas shortages and consequent price volatility have been frequent occurrences in the Northeast during the winter months, especially during the type of exceptionally cold winters seen in 2014-15, for example. In an effort to offset increased demand for natural gas by its customers, Eversource Energy is building the high-voltage Northern Pass Transmission [NPT] line that will connect its service area’s electric grid to the Quebec province by way of New Hampshire. The $1.4 billion will construct 187 miles of new transmission lines that will run the length of New Hampshire and, in the process, connect the service area to 1,200 MW of Canadian hydroelectric capacity. The project is still several years away from completion, with the company stating that it doesn’t expect it to be in service until the first half of 2019, assuming that construction begins by the end of 2016. Complementing the Northern Pass project is a natural gas pipeline that Eversource announced late last year in partnership with Spectra Energy (NYSE: SE ). The $3 billion project is actually an expansion of pre-existing pipelines in the Northeast that supply natural gas to 60% of the region’s natural gas-fired power plants. When completed, the Access Northeast project will supply 5,000 MW of gas-fired electric generation capacity with natural gas from the Utica and Marcellus Shale regions, further helping to alleviate the Northeast’s natural gas shortages in the winter. The full expansion is expected to be in service as early as November 2018. Q2 earnings report Eversource Energy reported Q2 revenue of $1.8 billion, up by 8.3% YoY (see table) and beating the consensus estimate by $70 million. The increase came despite lower retail sales across its segments, with electric distribution sales down 0.1% YoY and natural gas sales down 1.2% YoY. Total operating income rose to $412 million from $294 million YoY as operating expenses failed to increase by the same amount as revenue. The company’s O&M costs fell as well, helping to offset an increase to purchased power costs over the same period. Eversource Energy financials (non-adjusted) Q2 2015 Q1 2015 Q4 2014 Q3 2014 Q2 2014 Revenue ($MM) 1,817.1 2,513.4 1,881.1 1,892.5 1,677.6 Gross income ($MM) 1,131.9 1,351.4 1,538.8 1,057.2 950.7 Net income ($MM) 207.5 253.3 221.6 234.6 127.4 Diluted EPS ($) 0.65 0.80 0.70 0.74 0.40 EBITDA ($MM) 588.6 667.0 594.3 606.0 451.7 Source: Morningstar (2015). Net income rose to $209.5 million from $129.2 million YoY, resulting in a diluted EPS of $0.65 versus $0.40 over the same period and beating the consensus estimate by $0.09. The strong earnings result was due to a number of factors related to both the company’s core operations and regulatory changes. Its electric generation and distribution segment fared best, reporting earnings of $121.6 million compared to $83.4 million in the previous year. The gain, which the company attributed to rising revenue and lower O&M expenses, occurred across all of the segment’s subsidiary entities. The electric transmission segment generated earnings of $80.4 million, up from $43.9 million YoY. The gain was almost entirely due to a FERC charge that was accounted for in the company’s Q2 2014 earnings report and was not repeated in the most recent quarter. Finally, the natural gas distribution segment had a slow quarter due to seasonal issues, although its earnings more than doubled from $2 million to $5.3 million YoY as a result of cold weather early in the quarter that resulted in a larger number of heating degree-days. Of Eversource’s total $0.25 YoY gain to diluted EPS, $0.11 was due to the previous year’s FERC charge and $0.10 was due to higher revenues in the most recent quarter. The Q2 earnings were in line with management’s earnings expectations and the company reaffirmed its estimated FY 2015 EPS range of $2.75 to $2.90 during the Q2 earnings call . The company also increased its quarterly dividend by 7.7% YoY to $0.42, resulting in a forward yield of 3.6%. Outlook Eversource Energy’s outlook has been dampened over the last year due to adverse regulatory decisions. The first of these was a decision by Connecticut state regulators to limit the company’s ROE to 9.17% , with 50/50 earnings sharing for the 100 basis points over that amount. This ROE was less than the company had expected and relatively low compared to those permitted for its industry peers. Second, federal regulators recently reduced the company’s transmission ROE from 11.14% to 10.57% . This latter decision in particular is a negative for Eversource given its large investment in new transmission assets. I am also concerned about the weather outlook for the company’s service area over the next six months. This year’s El Nino event is now expected to be one of the strongest on record even if it doesn’t actually set a new record. Previous El Ninos of similar strengths have been characterized by warmer-than-normal winter weather across the northern half of the U.S. that, as far as the eastern seaboard is concerned, pushes as far south as Washington D.C. This year’s event is expected to last into the spring, meaning that Eversource Energy’s service area is likely to experience fewer heating degree-days than normal (and certainly fewer than last year’s bitter winter) during its traditional high-earnings quarters of Q4 and Q1. It should be noted that El Nino’s impacts are not as severe on the eastern seaboard as on the western seaboard and, just as importantly, the forecast is still quite uncertain. That said, investors should not be surprised if the company reports YoY declines for the period from October to March. Eversource Energy’s longer-term outlook is improved by its heavy planned capital expenditures, especially on natural gas pipelines and electric transmission lines. In addition to providing a basis for future rate case increases, the capex is also intended to serve a more fundamental purpose by reducing the Northeast’s notorious natural gas price volatility, particularly in the winter months. As discussed earlier, the widespread replacement of coal in power plants and heating oil in homes by natural gas leads to shortages when temperatures turn colder, resulting in wide price swings in states such as Massachusetts that aren’t reflected by the Henry Hub price (see figure). In addition to being onerous for consumers who find their heating and, more recently, electric bills spiking each autumn and winter, this volatility threatens long-term consumption trends by encouraging consumers to find alternatives. Massachusetts Natural Gas Citygate Price data by YCharts While Eversource’s proposed capex is intended to lay the groundwork for long-term earnings growth via both rate and volume growth, potential investors should be aware that, as a regulated entity, many of these plans are dependent on the support of multiple regulated entities. The Northern Pass project has encountered numerous instances of NIMBYism in sparsely-populated New Hampshire that have driven up its costs by requiring some of the line to be buried, for example, and despite its relatively advanced stage, the company doesn’t expect final permits to be received until the end of 2016. Likewise, while the Access Northeast pipeline has political support due to the history of natural gas shortages in the region, there is always the potential for a combination of NIMBYism and environmental concerns to cause delays and additional expenses. Valuation The consensus analyst estimates for Eversource Energy’s diluted EPS in FY 2015 and FY 2016 have remained relatively flat over the last 90 days as its Q1 and Q2 earnings have largely met expectations. The FY 2015 estimate has increased from $2.85 to $2.87, near the top of management’s expected range, while the FY 2016 estimate has remained flat at $3.04. Based on a share price at the time of writing of $47.47, the company’s shares are trading at a trailing P/E ratio of 16.5x and forward ratios of 16.5x and 15.6x for FY 2015 and FY 2016, respectively. All three of the ratios are near, but not quite at, the bottom of their historical respective ranges since the beginning of 2012, having fallen substantially since the beginning of the year (see figure). ES PE Ratio (TTM) data by YCharts Conclusion Electric and natural gas utility Eversource Energy reported Q2 earnings earlier in the summer that beat on both lines, as its cost-saving efforts offset slight declines to retail volumes. The company is in the midst of a strategic shift following its recent merger that will see it move from electric generation and distribution to electric transmission and natural gas distribution. This is a forward-looking move that, in addition to providing the company with years of large capex to support future rate cases, is aimed at mitigating the natural gas shortages that affect its service area on an annual basis. Furthermore, unlike some logistics projects (the Keystone XL pipeline being the most visible example), neither the Northern Pass nor the Access Northeast projects are likely to be especially offensive to the environmentally-conscious residents of the region, with the former in particular connecting the company’s service area to zero-emission electricity. NIMBYism and opposition to natural gas do create some regulatory uncertainty regarding both projects’ futures, of course, but these are more likely to increase their costs rather than result in their cancellations. The company’s share price is trading at low valuations in terms of both trailing and future earnings. The only thing that prevents me from buying its shares today is the presence of an especially strong El Nino, which increases the likelihood that the company’s service area will experience warmer-than-normal temperatures in Q4 and Q1 2016, especially on a YoY basis. Disappointing earnings results in one or both quarters could cause the company’s shares to fall a bit further, especially if such an announcement follows on the heels of an expected interest rate increase by the Federal Reserve at the end of 2015. It has been more than three years since Eversource Energy’s share price has remained below 15x future earnings for a lengthy period of time, however, and I consider its shares to be an attractive long investment opportunity in the event that they decline below $45.60, or 15x FY 2016 earnings at the time of writing.

T-Mobile, Sprint To Win iPhone Upgrade War Vs. AT&T?

Look for T-Mobile US and Sprint to get the better of AT&T and Verizon Communications in the fierce battle for wireless customers upgrading to Apple’s (AAPL) iPhone 6s. So says Pacific Crest analyst Michael Bowen in a research note. Apple’s iPhone 6S and 6S Plus will hit retail stores on Friday as a promotional war intensifies among the big four national wireless firms: Verizon (VZ), AT&T (T), T-Mobile (TMUS) and Sprint (S). “T-Mobile and Sprint’s

COPEL Is Much More Stable Than CEMIG, But The Potential Upside Is Also Lower

Summary COPEL’s business is sound, with slow growth, low debt, a good dividend, good fundamentals and a good, stable historical performance. Due to the situation in Brazil, there is still more downside potential for the stock. CEMIG is a much more risky play, but the upside is also much higher. Introduction I recently wrote an article where I analyzed investment opportunities in Brazil that are listed on the NYSE and gave an overview of the economic situation. I found four interesting companies, of which BrasilAgro (NYSE: LND ) and Brasil Foods S.A. (NYSE: BRFS ) are good, but their P/E ratio is too high. This leaves us with two electrical companies, CEMIG (NYSE: CIG ) and Companhia Paranaense de Energia – COPEL (NYSE: ELP ). I have already written about CEMIG here and here , so in this article, I will analyze COPEL. About ELP ELP is the largest company of the State of Paraná (South Brazil), and serves electricity to 4,370,200 units. The company uses 18 hydroelectric plants that give 99.5% of its own electrical production, 1 thermal plant and 1 wind plant, with total installed capacity of 4,754 MW, a transmission system with 2,302 km of lines and 33 substations, a distribution system which consists of 192,116 km of lines and network of up to 230KV, and an optical telecommunication system. The company was founded in 1954, and has been listed on the NYSE since 1997. The State of Paraná is the major shareholder, with 58% of voting shares. There has been a lot of regulatory turbulence in the energy sector lately, especially with CIG losing 45% of its electricity generation capacity due to lost concessions. Energy prices increased and are currently under the red flag 3 regime, meaning that the electrical utilities sector is under pressure. The result of this is that ELP’s revenues increased 32% in Q2 2015, mostly due to price increases. Operating expenses increased even more, around 38% in the same period. The Business One of the main issues in the sector is that all the assets are mostly under concession from the government, but with the latest news on concessions, where the Federal Audit Court authorized the government to renew for another 30 years the concessions for electricity distributors whose contracts expire between 2015 and 2017, the situation is more stable now as compared to that a month ago. This is good news for ELP, as in the Q2 earnings conference call, the company did not know if its distribution concessions would be prolonged. As for electricity production, the situation with ELP is much more stable than it is with CIG, because ELP has only 5% of electricity production in doubt for 2015, whereas CIG had 45% of production in doubt, and eventually lost it. According to ELP’s CEO , the company will bid to renew the concessions and are pretty sure it will happen. The two plants in question are the Parigot de Souza and Mourão plants. ELP is also developing new projects, building 2,000 km of new distribution lines and developing new wind farms, with three new farms expected to start up in upcoming weeks. Fundamental Analysis The current P/E ratio is 7.91, and the price-to-book value is 0.6. In Table 1, you can see the main fundamental indicators for ELP and their stability in the Brazilian currency. Table 1: ELP Fundamentals 2010-2015 (Source: Morningstar ) In the Brazilian currency, ELP is able to transfer the increase in prices to its customers, which shows it to be a great hedge against inflation. The net income is pretty stable for a regulated electrical company, and it can be assumed with a high degree of certainty that ELP will continue to operate less or more positively in the future. The dividend is also stable, and the company has a policy of paying at least 25% of its net profits in dividends. This means that with the trailing earnings, an investor can expect minimally US$0.25 per share at the current exchange rate. This would give a 3% dividend yield at current prices and exchange rates. The gross margin is slowly deteriorating, but we can expect it to improve as soon as the extraordinary circumstances in the Brazilian energy market pass. Technical Analysis The main issue here is not ELP’s business or its fundamentals, but the volatility of the exchange rate between the US dollar and the Brazilian real. In Figure 1, you can see that an end to the depreciation of the real is nowhere to be seen. Figure 1: Brazilian real per US$1 from 2005 to 2015 (Source: XE.com ) I cannot predict what will happen here in the next few years. Currently, the situation in Brazil is far from stable, but in the period from 2009 to 2011, the real appreciated against the US dollar by 60%. We could say that there is blood on the Brazilian financial markets now, and usually, these are the best times to buy. But the main question is: How low can the real go? On the other hand, if we see an improvement in the political and economic situation in Brazil, the exchange rate trend would quickly switch and create a point of stability at a certain level. This trend reversal could give a 25% currency gain and add an extra 25% to the dollar EPS of ELP. This is a scenario that would easily create a 50% return for international investors. But we would need a crystal ball to know when the bottom will be reached in Brazil. Conclusion If ELP were a European or US company, I would probably buy it at these ratios, expecting a healthy 13% yearly return and a 3-4% dividend that would allow me to repurchase shares. With the uncertain situation in Brazil and the real depreciating at a 10% monthly rate (August and September 2015), I want a much wider margin of safety. The margin of safety that I would look for to feel comfortable investing in ELP would be one that gives me a 15% return even if the real depreciates by another 50%. This means that for US$1, we would get R$6. In such a scenario, ELP’s EPS would be US$0.66, and to get a 15% return, the P/E ratio should be 6.66 – meaning that a safe entry-level stock price for ELP is US$4.4. We are still far from that, but everything is possible considering the current situation. ELP is very stable, and Brazil is very unstable for sure in the short term, but potentially stable in the long term. Such a situation makes me believe that there might be a chance of the stock falling a little bit more, and thus, increasing the safety margin for investors. My advice would be put this company on a watch list, estimate your required rate of return for such an investment, adding to that the potential further depreciation of the real, and thus get to a safe entry price for yourself. Comparison with CIG ELP’s price-to-book ratio is 0.6, and CIG’s is currently at the same level. The P/E ratio is 8 with ELP and 3 for CIG, but with the unclear future earnings stream for CIG due to the loss of the concessions on 40% of its energy production, the difference is justified. I do not see potential spectacular earnings growth with ELP, because it is a stable company that aims for sustainable growth, whereas with CIG, everything is possible due to the management’s more risky approach to business. CIG has the potential to bring EPS to $US1.5 per share that would give a P/E ratio of 1.13 at current prices and a dividend yield of around 40%. The risk-reward ratio is 50% downside and 50% upside with ELP, while with CIG, it is 50-100% downside and 600% upside. I will continue to follow the two companies, and if the divergence between the perception the investor community has about Brazil and the businesses’ results continues to grow, thus lowering the potential downside, I will start buying. So, for now, I will put both companies on a watch list and let you know more in the future.