Tag Archives: apple

Apple Supplier Skyworks To Buy PMC-Sierra For $2 Billion

Skyworks Solutions (SWKS) will buy data center chipmaker PMC-Sierra (PMCS) for $2 billion, following fellow Apple (AAPL) iPhone suppliers Avago Technologies (AVGO) and NXP Semiconductors (NXPI) in making acquisitions. Skyworks also gave strong early Q4 earnings. Skyworks announced late Monday that it will pay $10.50 a share in cash for PMC-Sierra, a 37% premium to Monday’s close at 7.69. Skyworks expects the deal to boost annual EPS by 75 cents.

Can You Bet On Duke?

Summary There are multiple concerns with the company right now regarding lawsuits and blackouts, but this company is taking all the right steps towards clean energy to foster long-term growth. Focusing in on the stock’s current level after August/September volatility is key to deciding whether or not an entry point is plausible right now. It’s consistent dividend, but inconsistent cash flow is worrisome, yet I believe the company will pull through.. Duke Energy (NYSE: DUK ) is one of the most stable companies in my portfolio, but is starting to really look like a growth story based upon the ventures its undertaking. The stock rose quite confidently through August before getting hammered by speculation on the Fed in September. I view the mid-September bottom as the lowest level for the rest of the year, unless more Fed speculation develops. I’d argue that Duke is going to trend higher based upon internal factors now, as their shift towards clean energy is creating significant long-term growth opportunities. Performance It’s been a while since I last wrote on Duke, and probably fair enough considering it’s a utility company and its catalysts typically aren’t notable enough to reiterate on a short time frame. Duke, however, is special. This company is constantly in the news, whether it’s about the coal basin fines or its movement to get low-cost energy to east coast residents in a variety of ways, creating a lot of activity in the stock. You can view the YTD trend below: (click to enlarge) Source: StockCharts Growth Catalysts I use this company primarily as a safe investment because I believe utility companies, in theory, are very stable and predictable investments. While the YTD price trend won’t necessarily agree with me, Duke is starting to present itself as a great growth opportunity and to really clarify the forward-looking catalysts, I’m examining the following: Duke has applied for a permit to build a solar facility in Osceloa County in Orlando, FL by spring 2016. This solar facility is expected to bring 500 MW to the county by 2024, which makes it a very large-scale project. Duke is applying for a permit next month to build a natural gas plant in Asheville. It’s approval could come by the end of this year and would serve as a significant catalyst for the stock. They’re closing their already standing electric steam plant in Asheville (378 MW) and replacing it with this new plant, whose capacity is 650 MW. Since 2008, the company has spent $4 billion on wind and solar projects, which helps replace the energy needs of its customers as more coal-fired power plants are retired; while this is the more long-term direction of the company, but is a solid basis for those considering a long position Hurricane Joaquin could negatively impact the stock depending on the number of blackouts that occur and are attributable to Duke Expenditures to close the coal ash basins in an environmentally responsible manner will continue to occur, with the most recent payout being $7 million. They’re due to pay another $10-15 million by 2029 for this location. Fourteen total basins are required to be closed. The $90 million Indiana power plant payment has already been priced into the stock, in my opinion. Marginally lower utility rates for South Carolinians thanks to lower natural gas and lower coal prices. The finishing of several natural gas pipelines from the Marcellus is going to bring low-cost energy to east coast residents, allowing Duke to take advantage. These pipelines have been stalled from completion in the past, but are on track to finish by mid-late November. Keeping an eye on treasury yields is a good idea as these generally move in an inverse trend to utility stocks like Duke. As a further consideration, Duke has been one of the biggest movers on interest rate speculation in recent months and if interest rates do get hiked, Duke will see a noticeable pullback. I do not believe the Fed will hike rates in October, but there will still be added volatility as we near Yellen’s next speech. What’s notable about these growth catalysts is that Duke is moving away from harmful, nonrenewable energy sources towards cleaner fuels like natural gas and solar, which helps to not only make this company more of an ethical investment, but also helps it to reduce operating costs in the long-term and service a wider range of individuals. When you think about that value proposition, it’s hard to not justify an initial entry into the stock right now. From a financial standpoint, I think this company is heading into Q3 earnings with a lot of confidence. It has its highest TTM ROE in two years at 6.91%, and revenue, net income, and EBITDA are all up from a low Q1, which can springboard some easy growth rates for the next earnings report. Additionally, Duke is in constant conversation with federal and state governments about lowering the tax burden that they currently face. If this can retract even a percentage point, Duke is going to be in that much better position. Dividend Consideration The stock is currently yielding 4.67% and it’s worth noting that this is the 88th year in a row that Duke has paid a dividend, that’s nothing short of pure consistency. The dividend that was paid out on Sept. 16 was up 3.8% from the previous payout. Furthermore, the TTM payout ratio is 94.6% – that’s exceptional. The 5Y growth rate seems low at just 2.24%, but the payout is high enough to appease my concerns. Now, there are concerns about whether or not this company can continue to pay its high dividend given its current level of cash flows. OCF has been steady the last two quarters at $1.44 billion, and it’s worth noting that Q3 2014 showed the highest quarterly OCF in two years at $2.55 billion, which is going to create high expectations come the ER. FCF is unfortunately all over the place, due to their debt reduction/issuance activity, and is currently negative at -$212 million for Q2. TTM FCF is $797 million. Essentially, the company shells out anywhere from $551-$565 million in dividend payments every quarter and has not failed to pay these dividends in a very long time. Thinking that Duke may cut its dividend or not payout is not a current concern, despite less than ideal cash flows. Conclusion We’re a while out from the Q3 earnings report in the first week of November, we have a lot to consider about this company’s financial health and valuation. Current P/E is 18.29 which is above the industry average of 15.04, but I’d argue that this is very marginal, all things considered. Duke, to me, is a company that you place a long position into and let it sit and provide you a modest annual return and a good stream of consistent and growing dividends.

What If Everyone Indexed?

People generally think that more indexing will make the markets function less efficiently. I don’t think this is true at all. The fact that most index funds and ETFs are more tax- and fee-efficient than mutual funds does not mean they are necessarily less “active”. Most passive investing means there will be greater demand for active managers in the form of market makers and arbitrageurs. If everyone indexed, then that much more active market making would be required. I see this question more and more as indexing grows in popularity. People generally think that more indexing will make the markets function less efficiently. I don’t think this is true at all. Unfortunately, the question and its answers are usually shrouded in misunderstandings about how assets are priced and myths about what it means to invest “passively”. So, let’s think about this from an operational perspective. An index fund is not really an “index”. They are portfolios managed every day trying to track an index. These funds are managed actively, and involve hundreds, if not thousands, of decisions every year. The simplest example is the modern-day ETF, which is essentially a real-time version of what most people think of as an index fund. When you buy shares in an ETF, there is someone who is actively managing the allocation of funds (the same is true for an index mutual fund, though it’s less apparent in real-time, since the fund is not traded on an exchange). For instance, if the market price of an ETF were to deviate from the intraday indicative value, then the market makers would either buy/sell the ETF or buy/sell the underlying securities. So, while there doesn’t appear to be much activity on the surface, the very act of buying an index fund could actually force some active management in the underlying securities markets. In other words, your “passive” investment is the other side of the active management of the market maker or fund administrator.¹ It’s not a coincidence that high-frequency trading firms and big banks are making huge gobs of money during the rise of passive indexing. After all, passive indexing means that there is a greater need for those alternative forms of what is nothing more than “active” management. Unfortunately, the studies blasting active management usually include mutual fund managers and not the most active managers of them all – market makers and HFT firms. And make no mistake – these “active” operations are hugely profitable because they are essentially making “passive” portfolios available.² The kicker here is that index funds really aren’t passive at all. When you look at the underlying components of how the funds are actually managed, you realize that there’s a lot of activity in all of this. The fact that most index funds and ETFs are more tax- and fee-efficient than mutual funds does not mean they are necessarily less “active”, though. People misuse the term “passive indexing” on a near-daily basis now. And it’s the result of this desire to create a black-and-white view of the world, which is usually nothing more than a marketing pitch (something along the lines of – “We’re passive, so invest with us, because the misleading academic studies show that ‘active’ managers are dopes.”). The reality, however, is that there is really only active management and its varying degrees. Literally no one replicates a pre-fee and pre-tax index. Not a single investor. And your purchase and maintenance of a “passive” strategy will require a good deal of active upkeep. The bottom line is, most passive investing means there will be greater demand for active managers in the form of market makers and arbitrageurs. The ease of passive investing is made possible thanks to these active underlying elements. And that’s great, because it’s a win-win. Indexers get a low-fee and easy way to access markets. But they also bear the cost of their laziness (in numerous unseen ways), which is why making markets in index funds is hugely profitable. So, if everyone indexed, then that much more active market making would be required. End of story. ¹ – Read this fun paper on how ETFs work. ² – E.g., ever wonder how a big bank like Bank of America (NYSE: BAC ) can be profitable on 100% of its trading days in a quarter ? It’s thanks, in part, to passive indexers like me! “During the three months ended March 31, 2013, positive trading-related revenue was recorded for 100 percent, or 60 trading days, of which 97 percent (58 days) were daily trading gains of over $25 million.” (click to enlarge) Related: The Myth of Passive Investing