Tag Archives: apple

I Sold McDonald’s And Then Made These Moves

Summary I sold McDonald’s as I felt the future returns would be diminished. I bought Johnson & Johnson. I made a quick trade in Wells Fargo. I then added to my WEC Energy Group. Last week I published this article which detailed my reasons for selling McDonald’s (NYSE: MCD ). As I stated in the article, it was not easy selling MCD as I had held the stock for 8-years. However, I felt future growth was limited and the high dividend payout would limit future dividend growth. I decided that if I could find a stock with better long-term prospects, I would sell MCD. The stock had to pay a dividend in the vicinity of 3% or more, have good prospects for long term dividend growth, have a solid balance sheet, and have a business set for long-term growth. I keep a list of stocks that I believe are solid businesses and keep an eye on the price action so I am aware when they might become reasonably priced. One of those stocks is Johnson and Johnson (NYSE: JNJ ) and fortunately for me, it recently became reasonably priced. For most investors, JNJ needs no introduction, it is the largest health care company in the world, operating in three segments, consumer, pharmaceutical and medical devices. In the second quarter , consumer sales were $3.5 billion, pharmaceutical sales were $7.9 billion and medical devices had sales of $6.4 billion. Let’s take a look at all three of these segments. Consumer – The consumer segment primarily sells personal care products like nonprescription drugs, skin and hair care products, baby care products, oral care products and first aid products. JNJ products, like Tylenol and Listerine, are well known, but consumer is the smallest segment of JNJ. A few years back, JNJ was embarrassed by a rash of consumer product recalls due to poor safety protocols in the manufacturing plants. The recalls became so bad, that JNJ pulled many of its products from store shelves. After rebuilding their production facilities, JNJ products have slowly returned to the shelf and consumer sales have risen. In the second quarter worldwide consumer sales of $3.5 billion increased 2.3%, with U.S. sales up 2.7%, while outside the U.S. sales grew 2.1%. Look for JNJ to try and build their consumer business globally. Many of their products are regional and JNJ would like to expand their distribution. Here is a comment from JNJ management at a recent conference. ” Coupled with the fact that this business can be globalized, many of the brands have been developed regionally, we now think they can be taken on a more global scale .” Medical Devices – The medical devices segment sells a wide-range of products, such as wound care, surgical sports medicine. women’s health care, products for circulatory disease, blood glucose monitoring, orthopedic joint reconstruction, spinal products and disposable contact lenses. The medical device division recently completed a divestiture of Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics which reduced sales for the second quarter. Worldwide medical devices segment sales of $6.4 billion decreased 4.7%. U.S. sales declined 5.8% while sales outside the U.S. declined 3.9%. Excluding the impact of acquisitions and divestitures, underlying operational growth was 1.4% worldwide with the U.S. up 1.6% and growth of 1.4% outside the U.S. JNJ wants to be number one or number two in all their medical device businesses. Going forward, they want to focus on the orthopedic business as that is where they see the growth. Between 2015 and 2016 they will have 20 new product filings in the medical device business. Pharmaceuticals – The pharmaceutical segment includes products in therapeutics, anti-infective, anti-psychotic, cardiovascular, contraceptive, dermatology, gastrointestinal, hematology, immunology, neurology, oncology, pain management, urology and virology. As you can see, that is a long list and I could list all the drugs they currently have on market and what is about to come to market, but rather than list a bunch of drugs I cannot pronounce, I feel it is more important to share this fact. JNJ believes it will file 10 new drug filings by 2019, each with the potential to achieve $1 billion in annual sales. Here is a quote from JNJ’s second quarter earnings call . ” Our focused R&D strategy and commitment to driving launch excellence to ensure broad access and reimbursement has really come together to make a difference for patients and have this well-positioned to continue to drive above industry compound annual growth rate over the next several years. Fueled by seven of our recently launched products that we expect will each exceed $1 billion in sales this year and the more than 10 new products we plan to file by 2019 that each have $1 billion plus potential of their own based on their transformational potential to treat significant unmet medical needs worldwide .” In the second quarter worldwide sales of $7.9 billion increased 1% with U.S. sales down 1.5% and sales outside the U.S. up 3.8%. New competitors in hepatitis C and a divestiture impacted sales results. Why I am Confident in JNJ Going Forward – All the information I gave you concerning the various segments of JNJ business is interesting, but that is not why I bought the stock. I bought the stock for the following reasons.. The entire world population is getting old and in need of increased medical care. I like to buy stocks that have an overriding theme that will increase their chance for success. In JNJ’s case, their unique broad spectrum of health care products makes them an excellent candidate to benefit from the aging world population. Here are just a few facts highlighting why JNJ is likely to benefit from demographic trends. The United Nations states population aging is unprecedented, without parallel in human history and the 21st century will see even more rapid aging than did the previous century. The global share of older people (aged 60 and over) increased from 9.2 percent in 1990 to 11.7 percent in 2013 and will continue to grow to 21.1% in 2050. In the U.S. the older population-persons 65 years or older-numbered 44.7 million in 2013 (the latest year for which data is available). They represented 14.1% of the U.S. population, about one in every seven Americans. By 2060, there will be about 98 million older persons, more than twice their number in 2013. People 65+ represented 14.1% of the population in the year 2013 but are expected to grow to be 21.7% of the population by 2040. The increased number of persons over 65 years will potentially lead to increased health-care costs. The health-care cost per capita for persons over 65 years in the United States and other developed countries is three to five times greater than the cost for persons under 65 years, and the rapid growth in the number of older persons, coupled with continued advances in medical technology, is expected to create upward pressure on health- and long-term–care spending. One million Americans a year are getting total joint replacement. That figure is expected to grow to four million over the next 20-years. Global annual spending on cancer drugs has hit $100bn for the first time By 2021, annual prescription drug spending will nearly double, to $483.2 billion Health spending growth in the United States is projected to average 5.8 percent for 2014-24, reflecting the Affordable Care Act’s coverage expansions, faster economic growth, and population aging. Those are just a few facts, I could add more, but to me, it is obvious that as the world ages, health care will be a fast growing sector. I am confident, that JNJ, with its over 250 operating companies across the globe, will share in that growth. Why JNJ over McDonald’s – When comparing the two companies it seemed obvious to me, that JNJ was the financially stronger company and the company more likely to grow its business and dividend in the future. Let’s compare the two companies. All numbers are from Yahoo finance. Category JNJ MCD Price to earnings 16.75 23.95 Price to earnings growth 3.10 3.25 Price to book 3.70 9.05 Total cash $33.95B $4B Cash per share $12.26 $4.25 Debt $19.31B $17.9B Debt to equity 27.14 169.51 Yield 3.17 3.36 Dividend payout ratio 50.2% 77.96% Operating cash flow 17.09B 6.55B I think any fair-minded observer would look at those numbers and say JNJ is the more financially sound company and the company more likely to reward shareholders going forward. At a recent Morgan Stanley conference, JNJ CFO Dominic Caruso said this about the large amount of cash that is on the balance sheet. ” So I think it’s safe to say, we have sufficient capital to put to use, we’re going to put it to use. It’s going to be in a value creating acquisition, or in share buybacks ” So we have two companies. MCD which may be cash challenged, or JNJ which is sitting on a pile of cash. We have JNJ selling at a P/E under 17 and MCD selling for over 23. We have JNJ which has raised it’s dividend 6% and 7% the last two years and we have MCD which has raised it’s dividend 5% the last two years. We have JNJ which saw earnings per share grow from $3.49 in 2011 to $5.70 in 2014 and we have MCD which saw earnings fall from $5.27 in 2011 to $4.82 in 2014. After considering all that information, on September 28th, I sold MCD for $97.57 and bought a full position in JNJ for $90.41. I expect to hold forever, or until the business deteriorates. I expect JNJ to grow slowly, benefiting from the demographic trends and JNJ’s diverse health care related products. I also expect the dividend to grow steadily. Next Move McDonald’s was the second biggest position in my portfolio, so selling it freed up a large sum of cash. Even though I bought a full position in JNJ, I still had cash left over from the sale, in addition to cash that had built up in my account from the recent quarterly dividends. As I sat on the cash contemplating what to do with it, I saw a short term situation develop which I took advantage of. On Friday, October 2nd, the Labor Department announced a very disappointing jobs number. When I saw the jobs number, I knew the number was very disappointing and I knew traders would determine any Federal Reserve rate increase, which many thought was coming soon, would be delayed. Based on that, I had a hunch the banks would take a pounding at the open, as investors would determine the banks interest rate spreads, which everyone thought would be improving with a rate increase, would now be further in the future. As I expected, the market opened down big and the banks were the worse performers. I thought this was very short-sighted and an overreaction. Banks were in no worse shape on October 2nd than they were on October 1st. So I took the cash funds in my account and bought Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC ) for $49.60 shortly after the open. This was a short-term trade, not an investment. I have sworn off banks as an investment as it seems every five years or so, they have some sort of crisis. Fortunately for me, before the day was over, WFC was back above $51.00 and closed at $51.26. I sold WFC on October 7th for $52.56, a quick gain of approximately 6%. The 6% gain added a little more funds to my account, so on October 7th, after selling the Wells Fargo shares, I bought shares in WEC Energy Group (NYSE: WEC ), formerly Wisconsin Energy. I paid $51.88 per share. I began building a position in WEC in July, when I made two purchases, one for $45.10 and another for $46.34. Those two purchases amounted to a little bit more than a half position. With the latest purchase, I now have about an 85% position at a cost basis of $47.63. I imagine I will complete the position before the end of the year. The company, formerly known as Wisconsin Energy, recently purchased Intergys Energy another Midwest utility. The combined company is now known as WECEnergyGroup. WEC is deserving of its own article as there is a lot I would like to say, but briefly let me mention this. WEC provides electricity and natural gas service to 4.4 million customers across four states, Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan and Minnesota. They are the eighth largest natural gas distribution company in the country and among the 15 largest investor owned utilities in the country. WEC currently yields 3.5% and investors can expect dividend growth of 6-8% a year, in-line with earnings growth. I think WEC is an excellent, financially sound, utility which has several unique characteristics that differentiates it from other utilities. I will expand on WEC in a future article, but suffice to say, I intend to hold WEC forever, or until the business deteriorates. The End Result When all was said and done, I had sold McDonald’s, a long time holding and purchased Johnson and Johnson, a dividend stalwart, that had become attractively priced. I then made a quick purchase and sell of Wells Fargo that resulted in a small profit. Subsequently, I purchased additional shares in WEC Energy Group. So I now own a stock, JNJ, that, in-my-opinion, is a better value and has better long term prospects than MCD, which I previously owned. I also was able to purchase additional shares in WEC Energy Group a stock I am currently building a position in. In addition, the dividends I get from the shares I bought in JNJ and WEC will be slightly more than the dividends I was getting from MCD. Investing is about maximizing your investable cash. I believe in long-term investing, however, at times, there may be a company that offers better value, better growth, and/or better dividend growth, than the stock you own. In that case, selling a stock that you have owned for a long time makes sense. That is the situation I recently saw and that is the action I took. Only time will tell how it works out.

5 ETFs Leading The Broad Market Rally

After the worst third-quarter performance in four years, the U.S. stock market showed an impressive comeback to start the new quarter, trumping global growth worries. This is especially true as the S&P 500 index and Dow Jones climbed 7.1% and 6.7%, respectively, in the first few days of the final quarter of 2015. The rally has been broad-based with most of the sectors moving up on subsiding volatility and none of the issues from Q3 currently overwhelming the market. In particular, the rising oil price has fueled optimism into the battered energy sector and a rebound is noticeable in the beaten-down healthcare stocks. Further, China, the major culprit of the market turmoil, is showing signs of stabilization and commodities are surging too. Moreover, the dismal job report for September and the latest Fed minutes suggest that cheap money flows will be in place for longer than expected. This seems good for the stocks as the near-zero rates have allowed the U.S. stock market to complete a spectacular six-year bull-run. If these weren’t enough, the final three months have been the strongest and extremely profitable for investors, if history is any guide. Since 1995, the S&P 500 posted an average gain of 5% , representing the best quarterly return. This is especially true as seasonality drives the stock market higher during this time period given the crucial holiday shopping season and an expected Santa Claus Rally. Though there have been winners in every corner of the space, several ETFs have easily crushed the broad market fund (NYSEARCA: SPY ) by wide margins. Below, we have highlighted five ETFs have been star performers since the start of the fourth quarter and look to offer a broad exposure across a number of sectors. PowerShares S&P 500 High Beta Portfolio (NYSEARCA: SPHB ) This fund tracks the performance of 100 stocks from the S&P 500 Index with the highest realized volatility over the past 12 months. It follows the S&P 500 High Beta Index and has amassed $78.4 million in its asset base. The ETF trades in good volume of more than 132,000 shares a day and charges 0.25% in expense ratio. The product is widely spread out across each security as none of these holds more than 1.75% of total assets. Mid-caps account for 51% of the portfolio, while large caps comprise the remaining. Small caps get just 2%. From a sector look, energy takes the top spot with one-fourth share, closely followed by information technology (18.6%), industrials (16.8%) and consumer discretionary (12.9%). SPHB had a strong run this quarter, gaining near double digits. PowerShares Russell 2000 Equal Weight Portfolio ( EQWS ) This fund provides equal-weight exposure to the small-cap segment of the broad U.S. stock market. It tracks the Russell 2000 Equal Weight Index, holding 1,928 stocks in the basket with each holding less than 0.3% of assets. The product is also widely spread across a number of sectors with industrials, information technology, energy, consumer discretionary and consumer staples taking double-digit allocation each. The ETF is often overlooked by investors as depicted by AUM of $13.5 million and average daily volume of under 1,000 shares. It charges 27 bps in fees per year from investors. The fund gained about 9.7% since the start of the fourth quarter and has a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 or ‘Hold’ rating with a High risk outlook. Guggenheim S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value ETF (NYSEARCA: RZV ) This fund provides pure exposure to the small-cap value segment of the U.S. equity market by tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value Index. It holds 157 stocks in its basket that are widely spread across components with none holding more than 2.0% of total assets. From a sector look, about one-fourth of the portfolio is tilted toward the top sector – industrials – while information technology, consumer discretionary, financials and energy round off the top five. The product has been able to manage $154.7 million in its asset base while trading in a paltry volume of about 14,000 shares a day on average. It charges 35 bps in fees per year from investors and added about 9.5% in the first few trading sessions of the fourth quarter. RZV currently has a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 with a High risk outlook. Direxion Value Line Mid- and Large-Cap High Dividend ETF (NYSEARCA: VLML ) This fund uses a unique strategy to provide investors exposure to the mid and large-cap stocks that are expected to pay above-average dividends. This is easily done by tracking the Value Line Mid- and Large-Cap High Dividend Yield Index, which selects stocks based on the criteria of the four-part Value Line, namely, Timeliness, Performance, Safety Ranks and the Financial Strength Rating. This approach results in a basket of 51 securities, with Archer-Daniels-Midland (NYSE: ADM ), Air Products & Chemicals (NYSE: APD ) and Avery Dennison (NYSE: AVY ) as the top three holdings. The fund is well spread across various sectors with double-digit exposure to industrials, materials, consumer discretionary, technology, financials and energy. It was introduced to the space in March and has accumulated about $4.8 million in AUM. Volume is paltry at about 300 shares a day while expense ratio came in a bit higher at 0.38%, suggesting an extra hidden cost for this fund. VLML is up 9.3% so far this quarter. First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (NYSEARCA: FNK ) This product offers exposure to the mid cap value sector of the U.S. equity market and employs the AlphaDEX stock selection methodology to select stocks from the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. Holding 183 stocks in its basket, the fund provides a nice balance across each sector and securities, preventing heavy concentration. Industrials make up for the top sector at roughly 17.2% share while none of the securities hold more than 1.20% share in the basket. The ETF is relatively unpopular and illiquid in the mid cap space with AUM of $70.4 million and average daily volume of 13,000 shares. It charges a higher 73 bps in annual fees and has gained 8.8% in the same time frame. It has a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 with a Medium risk outlook. Bottom Line Investors should definitely look at these ETFs as these could continue their strong performances heading into the fourth quarter and lead the broad market rally. Original post .

Do Price Targets Matter In Volatile Markets? (And, Why Alpha Theory Should Be A Starting Point Even In Turbulent Times)

This blog was co-authored with Alpha Theory’s Customer Relations Manager, Dana Lambert. “Stock prices will continue to fluctuate – sometimes sharply – and the economy will have its ups and downs. Over time, however, we believe it is highly probable that the sort of businesses we own will continue to increase in value at a satisfactory rate.” – Warren Buffett, famed investor “While many have portrayed the current environment as a highly risky time to invest, these individuals are likely confusing risk with volatility. We believe risk should be determined based on the probability that an investor will incur a permanent loss of capital. As market values have declined substantially, this risk has actually diminished rather than increased. “- Bill Ackman, Pershing Square 3Q08 Investor Letter The recent market environment has proven challenging for many funds, including Alpha Theory clients. The market has been volatile, but the real challenge is directionality. As of September 28, the S&P was down 11% over the prior 49 trading days, with 30 of the 49 days being down. Alpha Theory clients generally benefit from pure volatility (large ups and downs without a direction) because they are buying on dips and selling on rises (mean-reversion). The problem with a uniformly down directional market is that clients are continually getting indications to add to their longs and trim their shorts – the proverbial “catching the falling knife”. Although Alpha Theory cannot overcome persistent negative correlation between scenario estimates and outcomes – in other words inaccurate research – it does offer three options to help clients deal with these circumstances. OPTION #1 – RAISE PREFERRED RETURN. When the price of an asset falls, its probability-weighted return (PWR) rises. When the PWR rises, the normal action is to increase your position size. But when all asset prices fall, all PWRs rise and thus the longs become more attractive and the shorts less so. This suggested increase in long exposure may not be tenable and there may be a general skepticism regarding the price targets. In this situation, a manager can raise the preferred return for longs and thus raise the ‘hurdle rate’ required to be a full position in his or her fund (i.e., before you required only a 40% PWR to be a full position, but in this market environment you require 60%). This will immediately lower long exposure and only suggest adding to the best ideas. In the extreme example of February 2009, clients raised their hurdle rates to 70% or 80% and were able to see quickly numerous compelling ideas and how to shift capital appropriately. OPTION #2 – RELATIVE INDEX ADJUSTMENT. As the market falls, the “market multiple” decreases – which has ripple effects through the price targets in Alpha Theory. For those who cannot re-underwrite all of their targets for the new market paradigm, the application offers an easy-to-use feature called ‘Relative Index Adjustment’. This basically adds back the move of the market to an asset’s expected return, and the following would be an illustrative example. If the market is down 11%, then most assets’ prices will also be down and their suggested position sizes will increase. Now let’s turn on the Relative Index Adjustment. If every asset is down 11%, commensurate with the market move, then Alpha Theory will adjust the prices so that there is no change (-11% Stock Move minus -11% Market Move = 0% change) and thus no suggested change in position size. The beauty of this system is that you can turn it on and off and the Market Move is calculated since the last price target update. So if an analyst updates a price target, the Market Move gets set back to zero because the analyst would take into account the new “market multiple.” OPTION #3 – RE-UNDERWRITE CONSERVATIVE PRICE TARGETS. Fundamental investors recognize that there is no absolute intrinsic value for each asset because their assumptions are subjective. There is, however, a range of assumptions that span from aggressive to conservative. Down markets imply that pushing your assumptions to the conservative end of the spectrum may be appropriate. After doing this, you can see which assets are still suggested buys and which are not. The confidence imbued by using the most conservative assumptions allows you to be aggressive with add and trim decisions. A few views to help isolate where to start the re-underwriting process are: Performance view : shows those assets that have suffered the most on an absolute and relative basis Group by Risk/Reward within 10% : groups the assets that are within 10% of Reward and 10% of Risk targets (click to enlarge) While consideration of the aforementioned steps certainly is appropriate, as you develop conviction about downward directionality for the market, it is also worth noting that volatile markets can often be followed by periods of relative calm and distinct upwardly-biased directionality – and of course this has been the pattern for the past several years now. So where in one week an analyst or PM sees a 1-year target as likely to be unachievable, the next week suddenly the expected return gap narrows considerably. In short, just when you may be losing faith in your targets, they can quickly fall back into an attainable range. Directional markets that move quickly are challenging for many reasons. It is easy to throw up your hands and rationalize that “price targets don’t matter” or “our research is wrong”. It is hard to restrain those emotions and redouble your efforts to find the value that has been exposed in the quick, volatile relocation of asset prices. To do so requires a rigorous, disciplined process that begins with retesting assumptions (i.e., raising return hurdles, adjusting for the market move, and setting more conservative targets). If, after re-underwriting price targets and portfolio inputs, Alpha Theory is still recommending upsizings, then you can feel confident in your actions … even in a volatile, directional market.