Tag Archives: apple

S&P 500 Posts 3rd Best October Returns In 25 Years

After losing -8.35% over the prior 2 months, the S&P 500 was up +8.44% in October. Abnormally high monthly returns like this are uncommon by historical standards. The stock market in 2015 continues to illustrate a volatile and highly unstable investment environment. We have often heard investors refer to October as being one of the worst months to invest in the stock market. To the degree that we have even witnessed investors hastily move their investments to cash. Perhaps this lies in some deeply rooted market fears that can be traced back to Black Monday , when on October 19th, 1987 the U.S. stock markets lost nearly -22% in a single day of trading. Whatever the cause for trepidation may be, the reality is that over the past 25 years October has actually been one of the best months to be an investor in domestic equities. After two consecutive months of negative returns for the S&P 500, investors entered October 2015 spooked by such technical omens as a break in the 200 day moving average, a death cross , and the Hindenburg Omen , among others. And yet, after all of the technical damage that had been wrought in recent weeks the S&P 500 managed to shock us all by turning in the best October return since 2011, up +8.44% for the period. While that last statistic may not sound overwhelmingly impressive, one must further consider the context. That unexpected +8.44% monthly return was actually the third best October return in the past 25 years! Perhaps even more incredulous is the fact that that was actually the 7th best return generated in any month over the past 25 years period (including the “go-go” markets of the 90’s)! In other words, out of the past 397 months of S&P 500 returns, last month’s return came in 7th. And let’s be blunt, no one saw it coming. In October of 2011, the S&P 500 generated the highest return of any month over the past 25 years, up +10.93%. This came after 5 consecutive monthly losses over which the S&P 500 suffered a cumulative decline of -16.26%. Losses over this period were exacerbated by an August S&P downgrade of U.S. long-term debt from AAA to AA and growing fears that the Euro may break up, all of which led to capitulation by worrisome market participants. As is the case in most instances, the markets overreacted to the downside and rebounded with strength shortly thereafter. In October of 2002, the S&P 500 generated the 2nd highest October return over the past 25 years, up +8.80%. This came at the height of the bursting of the Tech Bubble, where over the prior five month period the S&P 500 experienced an outsized cumulative loss of over -28%. So here again, we witnessed capitulation followed by a strong rebound. Even coming out of the Great Recession, when in early March of 2009 we finally found our bottom, the S&P 500 generated a monthly return of +8.76%. However, this strong return to the upside only came after the markets had lost a gut wrenching -41.83% over the prior 6 month period. So forgive us if we find it somewhat peculiar that the S&P 500 was up over 8% last month. In nearly every instance in which returns of this magnitude have been generated in a single month over the past 25 years, they have come only after the markets had suffered significant losses. While we recognize losses of any size may be difficult to bear, a loss of slightly more than 8% over a two month period is exceedingly commonplace in the stock market. What is uncommon are returns north of 8% in a single month without coming after significant losses. In 2002 when October returns were this strong, the S&P 500 still finished down -22.10% for the year. In October of 2011, when the S&P 500 posted it’s strongest monthly return over the last 25 years, the S&P 500 finished up a modest +2.11% (all of which was attributable to dividends, without them the return was actually 0.0%). Where we end up for 2015 is really anyone’s best guess, but after taking a look at monthly returns over the past 25 years, it should be clear to see that volatility has increased and the markets appear undecided for the time being as to whether our next leg will be up or down. It should also be clear that listening to the noise that is so widely disseminated in our industry, should largely be ignored. What is more important is that investors follow an investment discipline devoid of emotional influence. With that said, we would be remiss if we did not impart a word of caution regarding our current investment environment. One should be weary of market head-fakes , as the markets in 2015 have grown increasingly prone to lead investors in one direction, only to quickly reverse course. Adding new monies into equities at this time may very well prove to be an exercise and lesson in chasing returns. For tactical investment managers, employing an asset rotation based investment approach, whipsawing markets such as we have seen thus far in 2015 can prove to be challenging, as underlying trends become less stable. However, if executed properly the purpose of reducing volatility in returns and achieving low correlations to both the equity and bond markets should be evident. For those unfamiliar with tactical portfolio management, you may refer to our previously published article on SeekingAlpha, How To Beat The Market With Tactical Asset Rotation or our recently published book by Wiley & Sons, “Asset Rotation” . In each we illustrate a rudimentary approach to tactical portfolio management and provide a root foundation for understanding the benefits of this type of investment philosophy. Lastly, since we have attached a table with monthly returns on the S&P 500 for reference pertaining to this article, there are a couple ancillary points we will leave you with that may surprise you: Over the past 25 years, October has generated a negative monthly return only 7 times (tied for third best). 3 out of the 7 best monthly returns over the past 25 years have come in October. Surprisingly, July and September posted monthly losses in 12 out of the past 25 years (tied for the worst month for investors over the period). Never underestimate the power of the jolly fat man… December has posted a negative rate of return in only 4 out of the past 25 years (by the far the best month for investors over the past 25 years). (click to enlarge)

A Rate Hike Can Badly Hurt High-Flying Growth Stocks In Tech, Biotech

Growth companies are currently valued very richly not only because they are growth stocks but also because short-term interest rates are almost zero. Waiting for growth companies to reach their potential is inexpensive when it doesn’t incur interest payments, but that can change at any time. There is a real chance that investors will panic about growth stocks when (or before) short-term rates will be raised. Very few investors would believe that a rate hike can hurt stocks like Amazon ( AMZN ), Facebook ( FB ), Tesla ( TSLA ), Netflix ( NFLX ) and LinkedIn ( LNKD ) (or even Alphabet ( GOOG ) (NASDAQ: GOOGL ) – what used to be Google). These are some extraordinary companies. And there are many other companies, especially in the biotech sector, which can have extraordinary growth in the coming years. Very few people doubt that these names are great and will offer exceptional growth in the coming years. I’m no exception – I believe that the mentioned companies, and many other smaller ones, will offer great revenue and income growth over the coming years. But if you look at their valuations Facebook seems to be a bargain, with a respectable trailing P/E of 100. Amazon, Tesla, Netflix and LinkedIn don’t really make any meaningful profits and their valuations are based on their potential alone. And there are many such companies, smaller and less known ones, which are solely valued according to their potential, especially in the biotech sector. Stocks can be quite vulnerable to short-term interest rates because there are very easy ways, for pretty much everyone, to own stock on leverage nowadays without paying much in interest. Other assets are a lot more complicated to own just based on short-term interest rates, as they are quite illiquid, and intermediaries – especially banks since the financial crisis – are not willing to lend at low rates. Therefore it’s not common to see such optimistic valuations anywhere, nowadays, other than in the so-called growth stocks. I am saying “so-called” not because I do not believe they are growth stocks, especially the ones I named, but because the whole idea behind “growth” is subjective and based on popular perception. I don’t remember many people calling Amazon a growth stock 10 years ago. But it was a growth stock even back then, however not popular at all. Just take a look at two charts below, the first one of Amazon, and the second one from the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index ( NBI ). Both Amazon and the biotechnology sector were considered to have growth potential 10 years ago, but their shares were very unpopular. What has happened in the meantime that has made such stocks so popular? Money has become very cheap, and the time value of short-term money has become almost zero, especially if you have access to large sums and you can practically leverage up at almost no cost. This phenomenon was true since 2009, but it truly started to affect the growth sector in 2013. Why 2013? Between 2009 and 2013 there had been too many nasty surprises, especially with the real estate market and then with the European crisis. Probably investors, and particularly hedge funds, started to think that zero interest rates were a safe bet as long as you went for growth stocks. They apparently offered no nasty surprises. And they haven’t offered nasty surprises ever since the crash in year 2000 actually. With hindsight it seems very easy to understand that if you can borrow at practically no cost there is no problem to wait. So, why not bet for companies which offer “certain” growth for at least 5 to 10 years in the future? This way, with some good hedging in place for short-term fluctuations, a hedge fund could do quite well in the longer term. Now the market has become complacent, evaluating growth companies as if short-term interest rates are a sure thing forever. If this changes, it will catch many by surprise. Even the belief that the Fed is certain to raise rates might panic those who are in the so-called growth stocks. But this is to be seen. What is for sure is that very expensive and fashionable growth stocks are not exactly the safe bet they are believed to be. The companies behind the stocks will likely continue to do well, but there is good chance that their current out-of-touch valuations will be a thing of the past, at least for a while. Amazon and Facebook, for example, are truly great companies. They have exceptional management and they have pretty much built monopolies. But they are currently making very little profits to justify their huge valuations. Does anybody know how much they will make in 5 or 10 years? I personally think that Facebook is likely to make $10 billion perhaps in 5 years – for fiscal year 2020. But it’s valued at almost $300 billion now. When will it make $20 billion in a year to justify its current capitalization? In 2025? It is quite possible, though not certain at all. But that is 10 years from now. It is OK to wait if you don’t pay any interest on your money, but if there will be interest to pay things will change. And as any experienced investor knows, when things change course in the stock market it usually happens suddenly and dramatically. The situation is even more serious in the case for Amazon. Amazon is a great company, but one of the reasons it has such extraordinary growth right now is because it doesn’t care about profits. Investors don’t really want to own shares in a company where the management doesn’t care about profits. So they will ask for profits in case the stock will go down – and it won’t be so popular any more. Will Amazon stock be so popular by continuing to offer great service to its customers but almost nothing to its shareholders? Of course this is considered to be a temporary thing, but it is anybody’s guess how much money Amazon will be able to make when it will consider that it has grown enough to start making some real money. It’s also anybody’s guess whether those online merchants whom Amazon will not have killed off by then will not take away its apparently loyal customers. Will Amazon users/customers/members will still stick around in case other online shops will offer better deals? It’s simply anybody’s guess. But in today’s zero short-term interest rates many investors seem not to mind waiting. And this zero short-term rate environment can change soon. And all this waiting has resulted in some too optimistic evaluations for companies which have been able to offer growth for some years now, as if the future is a certainty – which it never is.

Apple, Alphabet Jumping Into Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence will sweep across technology sectors as robotics usage in manufacturing soars, says Merrill Lynch in a 300-page study that notes Japanese and U.S. companies such as Alphabet and Apple (AAPL) are leading the charge into AI. Apple recently acquired two AI startups, Perceptio and VocalIQ. Among U.S. companies, Alphabet (GOOGL) and IBM (IBM) have high exposure to AI, says the Bank of America report. In robotics, BofA’s stock