Tag Archives: apple

Valuations Are 80% Of The Stock Investing Story

By Rob Bennett I often make the claim that it is a terrible mistake for buy-and-holders not to take valuations into consideration when setting their stock allocations, because the peer-reviewed research in this field shows that valuations are the most important factor bearing on whether an investor achieves long-term investing success. I say that if you get valuations right, you are almost certain to do well in the long run even if your understanding of all other issues is poor, and that if you get them wrong, you are almost certain to do poorly in the long run even if your understanding of all other issues is strong. I sum up the point by stating that the valuations issue comprises roughly 80 percent of the stock investing story. It’s an informed estimate. I don’t believe that there is any way to say precisely how big an impact understanding valuations will have on an investor’s long-term success. But the evidence that I have seen has persuaded me that the valuations factor is of far more importance than most people realize, that it may well be 80 percent of the stock investing story or perhaps even a bit more than that. How much would you say that price matters when buying a car? It’s certainly not the only factor. You need to be sure that a car is well made. A poorly designed car is not a good deal even at a low price. And you need to be sure that the car you buy is one well suited to your needs. Someone who desires a sports car will not be happy with even a well-designed family van. And there are lots of personal considerations that need to be taken into account. Some people like red cars. Some people like black cars. Getting the color right can add a good bit to your enjoyment of the car you buy. Still, I think it can be said that researching prices and negotiating a good deal on price is 80 percent of what makes one a successful car buyer. Getting the color right is easy – you just need to be willing to drive to a second dealer if the first one you visit does not have the right color in stock. And it doesn’t take too much effort to identify the best style of car to satisfy your particular needs. We all know what is out there. You might need to check out a few vehicles to decide which particular sports car or which particular family van is right for you. But it is not difficult to get that aspect of the car buying experience settled in your favor. Nor does it take much research to learn which cars have a reputation for being built well. Getting the price right is harder. If you accept the dealer’s price, you are almost certainly going to overpay by hundreds of dollars, and quite possibly by several thousand dollars. If you do enough research to enter the dealer’s lot with confidence that you know the fair market value of the vehicle that you intend to purchase, and are willing to invest the time and energy needed to negotiate a good deal, you are going to enjoy a huge dollar return for the hours invested. You can improve your car deal by thousands of dollars by working the price aspect of the matter, potentially turning a very bad deal into a very good deal by focusing on this all-important issue. There is now 34 years of peer-reviewed research telling us that it works precisely the same way when buying stocks rather than cars. The safe withdrawal rate in 2000 was 1.6 percent real. The safe withdrawal rate in 1982 was 9 percent real. This means that a retiree with a $1 million portfolio who began her retirement in 1982 could live the life available on a $90,000 budget for her remaining years, while a retiree with a $1 million portfolio who began her retirement in 2000 could only live the life available on a $16,000 budget for her remaining years. That’s a big difference! It is critical to take valuations into consideration when planning a retirement. I think it would be fair to say the numbers show that valuations are roughly 80 percent of the retirement planning story. The story is the same for investors who are in the stage of life where they are accumulating assets, rather than living off the earnings from them. A regression analysis of the 145 years of historical data available to us shows that the most likely 10-year annualized return for stocks purchased in 1982 was 15 percent real. The most likely 10-year annualized return for stocks purchased in 2000 was a negative 1 percent real. That’s a difference of 16 percentage points of return! For 10 years running! Knowing about that difference and taking advantage of the knowledge by going with a higher stock allocation when going-forward returns are likely to be good than you go with when going-forward returns are likely to be poor turns the magic of compounding returns very much in your favor. I think it would be fair to say the numbers show that valuations are roughly 80 percent of the asset allocation story too. Lots of non-valuation factors matter. Interest rates matter. Unemployment rates matter. Consumer confidence levels matter. Inflation rates matter. And on and on. But those factors are all factored into the price that is available to the individual investor considering a stock purchase. So, while these other factors play a role in the investing game, we as individual investors need not pay attention to them. There is only one decision in our control – what percentage of our portfolio will be comprised of stocks. If we buy at good prices, we always do well in the long term. There has never once in the history of the market been an exception to this rule. And if we buy at bad prices, we always do poorly in the long run. Again, there has never been an exception. Most investors accept that valuations matter. But few realize how big a factor the valuations factor is (I can’t help but wonder if the reason might be that there is so much money to be made on the selling side by persuading investors that valuations are not a big deal). The reality is that the stock market is like every other market known to humankind – price is by far the dominant factor in the determination of whether market participants are able to achieve a good deal or not. Disclosure: None.

Demographics Will Drive Future Investment Decisions

Summary Society is getting older and will need more healthcare. Fewer younger people and they have different tastes. The wise investor should pay attention to these changing demographics. Bob Dylan sang “the times they are a-changin'” in 1964, and he couldn’t have been more right. Things are indeed changing. Society is aging, every day 10,000 more people turn 65, and fewer babies are being born, the average fertility rate is now less than 1.9, almost a 50% drop off from the peak in 1959. More older, and retired, people means more spending on healthcare and leisure activities and fewer younger people means less spending on homes, cars, and other big ticket items. And the young crowd has different tastes and are more health conscious regarding food than their parents or grandparents. Demographers are saying that these trends probably will be with us for a long time, likely out to the year 2050. How will this turn of events affect investors going forward? Hint: those holding shares of companies such as Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ ), McDonald’s (NYSE: MCD ), and Universal Health Realty Income Trust (NYSE: UHT ) should pay attention. Older and wiser Pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson supplies prescription drugs, consumer health items, and medical devices, which all should be in great demand for the foreseeable future. A well-performing management team has steered the company through both good and bad times by employing a successful acquisition strategy and top-notch R&D effort that has helped keep the drug pipeline stocked with a seemingly never ending supply. As of April, there were 15 different drugs in the late stage U.S. and E.U. approval phase. As soon as those patent-protected products head to market, investors can expect to start reaping the benefits, which will probably include more dividend hikes. The company, one of the few with a pristine AAA credit rating, has raised the dividend payout every year since 1963 and has been growing it at a 6.5% annual rate over the last half-decade. Shares currently yield about 2.9%, well above the rate on 5- and 10-year Treasury notes. There is plenty of room to keep the dividend flowing and growing. The payout ratio of less than 50% is modest. Johnson & Johnson will probably continue to generate consistent cash flow from operations, it was $14B last year alone, and has a low (0.2) long-term debt to equity ratio. Analysts project that earnings and cash flow will continue to increase. EPS has averaged a double-digit growth rate over the past three years, a time when many companies have struggled. Universal Health Realty Income Trust is a REIT that owns medical office buildings, urgent care facilities, and other healthcare-related properties. The company has been increasing revenue at a double-digit pace for the past half decade. Over the past year, UHT has assumed a minority interest in several other real estate firms and added four new buildings to its portfolio which should help continue the trend. Universal Health pays a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share and the stock currently yields about 5.0%, double that of the average Dividend Aristocrat and well above what you can find in most investment-grade bonds. The company has traditionally generated adequate “funds from operations,” or FFO, a metric commonly used in the REIT industry, over the years. A recent quarterly filing indicated that adjusted FFO increased 3% to $0.72 per diluted share. The stock is not without risk. The current price/sales ratio of about 10.6 could mean that shares are a bit pricey right now. Changing tastes With fewer younger people around, companies that previously catered to this segment of the population probably will be impacted. Shareholders of retail outlets, home builders, and even auto manufacturers could see a lot of red over the next few decades. And the younger crowd has different tastes than the generations that came before them. For one thing, they want a healthier brand of fast food. This could impact old school companies, such as McDonald’s. The Oak Brook, IL-based burger giant has reported less foot traffic and lower same-store sales over the past few years. In a bid to reverse this trend, the company had to make radical changes to both its menu (for example, adding all-day breakfast and reducing the number of items) and to management (earlier this year a new CEO took over). I recently wrote an article that concluded that so far the improvements have helped stabilize things at least but will the company be able to withstand three decades of demographic headwinds? Conclusion Demographic trends indicate that up to the middle of the century things could be dicey for some companies like McDonald’s, as a smaller number of younger people spend their money in different ways than before. However, the aging of society might be a boon to the healthcare industry, which would make investors of Johnson & Johnson and Universal Healthcare Realty Trust happy.

Good News For Apple On Several Fronts; Stock Tired?

In its first three months on sale, the Apple (AAPL) iPad Pro has the potential to make $2.4 billion in revenue with three million units sold, RBC Capital Markets said in a report issued Tuesday. More good news for Apple comes from the payments space as Apple Pay’s reach broadens. According to a Wall Street Journal report, Apple plans to launch Apple Pay in China by early February as it forges pacts with China’s big state-run banks. And in the