Tag Archives: apple

‘India The Next China’ For Apple, Says UBS, And iPhone SE Will Help

“India is the next China for Apple ( AAPL ),” says a UBS analyst, who forecasts that the new iPhone SE will help Apple gain market share, albeit still at the high end, in India. Apple has priced the 4-inch iPhone SE starting at $399, about $100 less than expected. But that’s still a high price-tag for most consumers in India, says UBS analyst  Steven Milunovich in a research report. “Some people in developed countries prefer the one-handed 4-inch format, while the lower price attracts emerging-market owners,” wrote Milunovich. “India is the next China for Apple — while the SE price point is high for India, at least it buys new technology now.” The iPhone SE is an update to the 2.5-year-old iPhone 5S. It features upgraded internal components such as an A9 processor and a 12-megapixel camera. Citigroup analyst Jim Suva also says the iPhone SE will boost Apple’s share in India. “Apple currently has 2% share in India for calendar year 2015, and we believe if the company were to increase its market share to be similar to that in China (around 13%) this would increase iPhone units by 15-20 million units,” Suva said in a report. Apple has been investing in India throughout 2015, with a development center in Hyderabad and licenses to launch its own stores in the country. “With the iPhone SE, Apple will not really disrupt the Indian smartphone market but rather try to dominate high-end sales — 77% of smartphone sales in India in 2016 will be below $200,” said Ronan de Renesse, an analyst at U.K.-based Ovum, in a report. China’s slowing economy is a worry for its local smartphone makers as well as Apple. Apple’s December-quarter sales in China rose only 14% from the year-earlier quarter, down from 99% growth the preceding quarter. Xiaomi was the top smartphone seller in China in Q4, with 15% market share, followed closely by Huawei, with Apple in third place.

How To Find The Best Style Mutual Funds: Q1’16

Finding the best mutual funds is an increasingly difficult task in a world with so many to choose from. How can you pick with so many choices available? Don’t Trust Mutual Fund Labels There are at least 929 different Large Cap Value mutual funds and at least 6296 mutual funds across twelve styles. Do investors need 524+ choices on average per style? How different can the mutual funds be? Those 929 Large Cap Value mutual funds are very different. With anywhere from eight to 741 holdings, many of these Large Cap Value mutual funds have drastically different portfolios, creating drastically different investment implications. The same is true for the mutual funds in any other style, as each offers a very different mix of good and bad stocks. Large Cap Blend ranks first for stock selection. Small Cap Growth ranks last. Details on the Best & Worst mutual funds in each style are here . A Recipe for Paralysis By Analysis I think the large number of Large Cap Value (or any other) style mutual funds hurts investors more than it helps because too many options can be paralyzing. It is simply not possible for the majority of investors to properly assess the quality of so many mutual funds. Analyzing mutual funds, done with the proper diligence, is far more difficult than analyzing stocks because it means analyzing all the stocks within each mutual fund. As stated above, that can be as many as 741 stocks, and sometimes even more, for one mutual fund. Any investor focused on fulfilling fiduciary duties recognizes that analyzing the holdings of a mutual fund is critical to finding the best mutual fund. Figure 1 shows our top rated mutual fund for each style. Figure 1: The Best Mutual Fund in Each Style Click to enlarge Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings The Barrow Value Opportunity Fund (MUTF: BALIX ) ranks first, the Brown Advisory Equity Income Fund (MUTF: BAFDX ) ranks second, and the Wall Street Fund (MUTF: WALLX ) ranks third. The Artisan Mid Cap Value Fund (MUTF: APHQX ) ranks last. How To Avoid “The Danger Within” Why do you need to know the holdings of mutual funds before you buy? You need to be sure you do not buy a fund that might blow up. Buying a fund without analyzing its holdings is like buying a stock without analyzing its business and finances. No matter how cheap, if it holds bad stocks, the mutual fund’s performance will be bad. Don’t just take my word for it, see what Barron’s says on this matter. PERFORMANCE OF FUND’S HOLDINGS = PERFORMANCE OF FUND If Only Investors Could Find Funds Rated by Their Holdings… The Vulcan Value Partners Fund (MUTF: VVPLX ) is the top-rated Large Cap Blend mutual fund and the overall top-rated fund of the 6296 style mutual funds that we cover. The mutual funds in Figure 1 all receive an Attractive-or-better rating. However, with so few assets in some of the funds, it is clear investors haven’t identified these quality funds. Disclosure: David Trainer and Kyle Guske II receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, style, or theme. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

How Apple, Comcast, Google, Amazon Have Skin In FCC Set-Top Game

FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler aims to throw open the set-top box market, a plan that has Comcast ( CMCSA ), AT&T ( T ) and other pay-TV providers steaming but could take years to play out. The Federal Communications Commission plans to make it easier for consumers to switch from set-top boxes leased monthly from pay-TV companies to new devices sold at retail by consumer electronics or Internet companies. The pay-TV industry is worried about more than just losing revenue from monthly set-top fees, which usually run around $10. Apple ( AAPL ), Alphabet ’s ( GOOGL ) Google, Amazon.com ( AMZN ) and other new entrants would provide their own programming guide to consumers. Pay-TV firms fear losing the “customer relationship” and along with it the ability to collect viewership data, the key for targeted advertising. The FCC could approve Wheeler’s plan by year-end. Comcast, AT&T and other pay-TV firms would have two years to comply with technical standards that give new suppliers access to programming content. So in a worst-case situation, competing set-top TV devices could be available in 2019. As it is now, the set-top game is hit and miss. Some set-tops not from the pay-TV provider work with the pay-TV providers’ service, but others do not, depending on the set-top box, the pay-TV provider and the user’s region. And that scenario probably is not going to happen. Even if the current FCC approves Wheeler’s plan, a new chairman is expected to head the agency in 2017 after November’s presidential election. A Republican appointee would likely not follow through on the set-top market overhaul, while another Democratic FCC chairman might have other priorities, says Paul Gallant, an analyst at Guggenheim Partners. And if the FCC forges ahead with the set-top plan, a court battle is likely, and it could drag on. In the meantime, pay-TV companies would take steps to “maintain consumer inertia and impede adoption,” says Timothy Arcuri, an analyst at Cowen & Co. Cable companies have fought FCC attempts to open up the set-top market for 20 years. Will Set-Top Issue Become Moot Point? In a few years, the uproar over Wheeler’s proposal could be much ado over nothing, some observers say, as changes in technology and the way we all view video might make this a moot point. AT&T, for example, plans on selling DirecTV’s programming over the Internet starting late this year, and consumers won’t need the satellite TV broadcaster’s set-top boxes anymore. Some analysts say the future battle will be over the highest-spending consumers — the ones that now buy more premium channels,  pay-per-view and, in the future, might pony up for cloud movie storage or other perks. Those are the same subscribers advertisers will be interested in as well. Wheeler’s proposal zeros in on such users, and it’s “apt to emerge as the single biggest threat” to cable TV companies since satellite TV rivals emerged 30 years ago, says Citigroup analyst Jason Bazinet. “If Silicon Valley gets its way, pay-TV firms will provide the costly infrastructure to deliver bits of information,” Bazinet said in a report. “And they will provide programming at scale — relegating the pay-TV firms to being content wholesalers.” Here’s a run-down of some companies that have a stake in the set-top box battle, and the threats or opportunities it may present: Apple . It reportedly shelved plans for an Internet video service after programmers played hard ball in content negotiations. Under the new set-top rules, the FCC says that only pay-TV subscribers will gain access to programming and that copyright protections will be preserved. Even so, the FCC could clear a path for Apple into Web TV. Arris Group ( ARRS ). The supplier of set-top boxes to the cable industry seems vulnerable. But it could get a lift if cable TV firms race to upgrade their own set-top boxes. Barclays analyst Kannan Venkateshwar says Arris could also shift its focus to the retail channel. Amazon. The e-commerce leader, like Google, took part in an FCC task force that studied security issues in distributing content more broadly. Amazon, a player in subscription video-on-demand, has also been mulling a Web streaming service with live broadcast content. Comcast. By year-end, Comcast expects at least half of its 22 million video subscribers will be using Internet-ready, X1 set-top boxes — “the most advanced on the market today,” says a Moody’s report.  Barclays calls the X1 set-tops “arguably better than platforms like Apple TV today in terms of functionality. Whether Comcast can keep innovating is key if legal battles to halt the set-top initiative fail. Google. One of the FCC’s goals is making it easier for consumers to search for all content on both traditional pay-TV platforms, including video-on-demand, as well as across the Internet. That would play into Google’s strengths. And Google could swap its own advertising for the local ads sold by cable TV companies. Cable firms are worried that technical standards could result in revealing the “secret sauces” of set-top design to an archrival like Google, which “appears to be the primary backer” of the new set-top rules, says Jeffrey Wlodarczak, an analyst at Pivotal Research. Roku . The maker of video streaming devices has supported cable TV firms so far in the set-top box battle. Roku supplies devices to Time Warner Cable ( TWC ) and Charter Communications ( CHTR ), which both offer streaming deals to customers. Citigroup says pay TV firms prefer to have an app for their consumer offering, similar to how they work with Roku, rather than giving Google and others access to their content. Roku recently raised $45.5 million in a funding round. It’s not clear how the set-top box issue may impact any plans Roku has for an IPO. Rovi ( ROVI ). The provider of interactive programming guides main customers are pay-TV companies under licensing deals. Its new FanTV platform provides search and programming recommendations. Rovi also could be a “potential beneficiary,” says Cowen’s Arcuri, as cable TV firms try to improve offerings vs. new rivals. Tivo ( TIVO ). The  DVR pioneer has expanded beyond hardware sales and patent licensing to online subscription services. TiVo has been viewed as a possible seller of retail set-tops, like Google. But, its customers include small- and midsize pay TV companies . TiVo could provide more cable firms with next-generation features, including its cloud platform and mobile apps, analysts say.