Tag Archives: alternative

How High Is High? How Low Is Low?

How high is high? When asking this question it would also be wise to ponder the following, how low is low? Markets are capable of making extreme moves and we should remember trees don’t grow to the sky and markets don’t go up forever. As someone who has traded commodities for decades I would strongly recommend anyone considering jumping into the super high risk snake pit of commodity trading to steer clear of it. While I have had victories I have also gone through a slew of painful losses and been bludgeoned by markets and price swings that have defied all logic. Adding to a trader’s pain and woes is that when you are caught on the bad side of an ugly trade the speed that a vicious market can dish out its brutal assault is usually extremely underestimated. After over 30 years of trading commodities I will flat out state without any reservations that lies and manipulation run rampant. If you think anyone is looking out for the small independent trader in the stock market or commodity market you are wrong. A recent article caught my interest; it said: It is always darkest before the dawn. In other words, the energy market could see crude-oil prices tumble further in the coming days after closing near seven-year lows. January West Texas Intermediate crude tumbled $2.32, or 5.8%, to settle at $37.65 a barrel. At least one chart pattern followed by technical analysts is pointing to more pain for the WTI contract as oil tilted below $37 a barrel in early Tuesday’s trade. Talk has surfaced of 20 dollar oil at the same time some analyst said it is time for investors to jump in and “pick a bottom” pointing out energy stocks are now a bargain. History has shown that markets defy logic and our opinions are often wrong. Five years ago few market gurus predicted oil would trade at such low prices today. It is difficult to say where the price of oil will be next month. After asking the question of how high is high I must also ask, how low is low? Markets can make extreme or wild moves that charts often are unable to predict. This means it is both dangerous and difficult to pick a market top or bottom. Various technical trading systems while indicating an overbought or oversold market fail when asked to answer these two questions that would make us infallible and legendary investors. Today markets have added a couple new dimensions that will play an interesting role in just how violent and savage price swings are going forward. One of those is that computers now do a great deal of the trading and they are programmed to prey on the weaknesses of human trader using computing programs that exploit where stops are placed, this improves their ability to wash the weak out of their positions. Another factor is many people have grown far to complacent. The “buy the dip” mentality and the idea that the central banks coupled with the too big to fail financial institutions will keep these distorted markets elevated has become entrenched in the minds of many investors. This has lessened the importance of economic fundamentals and the question of how sustainable this market is. It has also put on the back-burner the question and issue of, how high is high. I have seen and heard far too many comments by those bullish on higher equity prices and ever higher markets basing their strategy on a policy of “don’t fight the Fed” and “buy the dips.” While this has worked since 2009 it is no guarantee that it will continue to produce positive results in the future. The “buy the dip mantra” will prove very costly when a real drop in the market does occur. A saying often used cautions traders they should never try to catch a falling knife. One problem we face in the current stock market is a lack of traders holding short positions. Several of the stocks that were recently on strong uptrends appear at heart to be fundamentally unstable and may have been driven higher by bears capitulating and buying back their positions rather than market fundamentals. We have witnessed massive moves in several speculative stocks like Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN ), Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA ), and Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX ) that are hard to defend by any other reasoning than shorts being squeezed out of the market. It is logical to think the higher a market goes the more vulnerable it becomes to a major violent decline or sudden savage downward price moves. A lack of short positions will bode poorly for the market if it falls rapidly because in such a situation as shorts take profit and buy back their positions they act as a floor under the market giving it support. The floor under this market is questionable and with contagion a growing concern it is understandable that junk bonds have begun to take a beating. The point of this post is to remind all of us the world of investing is a dangerous place and that much of how people react to events depends on how things are set up or how the cards are stacked when things happen, develop, and unfold. We often see that market reaction has more to do with timing and perception rather than being driven by reality. The economy tends to develop loops that feed back upon themselves, to this market driver we must add cross border money flows, central bank intervention, currency manipulation, and derivatives. This is only part of the list of pitfalls we face when we develop expectations that drive prices. To top things off we should recognize that at any time an unexpected black swan crisis is always lurking in the wings. This reinforces the idea that we should remain humble in trying to answer the questions of, how high is high, and how low is low. I have learned some valuable lessons over the years: markets don’t go in just one direction, values constantly shift, and after you lose your money it is to late.

Clean Energy Fuels – Expect A Turnaround In 2016

Summary A closer look at CLNE indicates that despite the drop in natural gas prices this year, its volumes delivered have increased as fleet operators are adding more natural gas vehicles. Low natural gas prices have been CLNE’s bane, but this should improve as marketed production in the U.S. declines, consumption increases, and exports begin. CLNE’s volumes will continue increasing as its customers have increased their fleets, while products such as the Redeem renewable natural gas fuel are gaining traction due to environmental benefits. Redeem is made from organic waste and is up to 90% cleaner on carbon emissions, making it the cleanest automobile fuel available commercially, leading to higher adoption by fleet operators. Technological improvements, such as the Cummins-Westport Low NOx 9-litre engine that can cut NOx emissions by 90%, are improving CLNE’s addressable market by gaining adoption due to their environment-friendliness. The rapid drop in oil and gas prices this year has created a lot of pressure on Clean Energy Fuels (NASDAQ: CLNE ) for two reasons. First, the decline in diesel prices has hurt the conversion of diesel vehicles to natural gas, and second, low natural gas prices have hurt Clean Energy’s financial performance. As a result of these two headwinds, Clean Energy shares trade near the lower end of their 52-week band, having lost over a quarter of their value this year. Looking past the weakness When Clean Energy Fuels had announced its third-quarter 2015 results, its revenue went down 11% year-over-year. Also, for the first nine months of the year, Clean Energy’s top line performance has diminished, as shown in the chart below: Source: Press release But, as we take a closer look at the distribution of revenue, we find that in the third quarter, Clean Energy’s revenue from the sale of fuel has actually increased by 6.7% despite a 40% decline in the natural gas price. This can be attributed to the fact that Clean Energy saw a 17% increase in gallons delivered last quarter, though weak natural gas pricing took out $5.7 million in revenue from its top line. More importantly, in the first nine months of the year, Clean Energy’s gallons delivered have increased over 19%, indicating that the company is still finding traction despite the drop in diesel prices. The following chart shows the improvement in Clean Energy’s volumes this year: Source: Press release Thus, the only problem that Clean Energy is facing currently is in terms of natural gas pricing, as a result of which its financials have taken a beating. However, over the long run, the conditions in the natural gas market should improve due to a few reasons, as stated below. Gauging a recovery in natural gas pricing There are two factors that could lead to an improvement in natural gas prices going forward – lower production and the start-up of exports from the U.S. As far as the first point is concerned, marketed natural gas production in 2016 is anticipated to grow at just 1.9% after rising 6.3% this year. At the same time, natural gas consumption is expected to rise from 76.5 billion cubic feet/day this year to 76.7 Bcf/d in 2016. As a result, a slight increase in consumption and a slowdown in marketed production will ease the oversupply in the end-market to some extent. Concurrently, as the U.S. is anticipated to start with its LNG shipments in the coming year, more supply will go out of the market and have a positive impact on prices. As such, it is not surprising that the EIA expects Henry Hub Natural Gas prices are expected to increase from $2.09/MMBtu in November to $2.88/MMBtu in 2016. The following chart shows the gradual increase in natural gas prices going forward: Source: EIA So, going forward, there might be respite for Clean Energy on the natural gas pricing front that will allow it to improve its financial performance. At the same time, Clean Energy will continue seeing an increase in its volumes delivered due to the benefits of using natural gas as fuel and the increasing fleet size of its customers. Why Clean Energy’s volumes will continue increasing As already discussed earlier in the article, Clean Energy is seeing an increase in its volumes, and the trend will continue going forward. During the third quarter, Clean Energy Fuels’ customers increased their gas-powered fleets. For example , Raven Transport’s natural gas fleet has increased by 40 LNG trucks recently and it now has a total of 223 LNG trucks in its fleet. Similarly, Saddle Creek Logistics hit the 50 million mile mark of its CNG fleet and announced that it will add 50 more CNG trucks soon to the existing 200 CNG tractor fleet. Additionally, Clean Energy has signed contracts for supplying to more than 300 new heavy-duty trucks, representing a fuel volume of 4.5 million gallons annually. Going forward, the U.S. should see an increase in natural gas-powered fleets as companies take steps to reduce emissions. Companies such as Unilever, Procter & Gamble, Anheuser-Busch, and others are considering the use of clean natural gas by the trucking companies as an important plus point while signing contracts. As a result, more and more fleet and individual vehicle owners are making this transition from oil to natural gas, which is simpler and economic than other available green options like oil to electric or even hybrid. Clean Energy is able to capitalize on this trend with products such as the Redeem renewable natural gas fuel. This is the “first commercially available renewable natural gas made from organic waste and is up to 90% cleaner on carbon emissions,” which makes it the cleanest automobile fuel available on a commercial basis. As a result of the qualities of this fuel, the sales volume of Redeem has almost tripled from 13 million gallons to 36 million gallons on a year-over-year basis last quarter. In the case of electricity generation too, natural gas is among the cleanest and safest fuels. Technological improvements such as the Cummins-Westport Low NOx 9-liter engine are aiding operators’ decision to adopt natural gas as a fuel. This engine, as mentioned during the Q3 earnings call, is able to cut NOx emissions by as much as 90% as compared to current EPA standards from 0.2 gm to 0.02 gm. Thus, given the environmental benefits of using natural gas engines and fuel, their demand should increase as the U.S. is looking to reduce pollution under the Clean Energy Plan . Conclusion One would think that low oil prices would have reversed the trend of increasing demand for natural gas. But, the reason for adopting natural gas for almost all users may not be solely the economics. Environmental safety is playing a big part in that decision, which is why Clean Energy has continued to see an increase in gallons delivered. Thus, going forward, Clean Energy Fuels should be able to come out of its slump as it will benefit from both an increase in volumes and better natural gas pricing, making it a good investment opportunity.

S&P 500 Valuation Dashboard – December Update

Summary 5 key fundamental factors are calculated across sectors. They are compared to historical averages. It results in a value score and a quality score for each sector. This article is part of a monthly series giving a valuation by sector of companies in the S&P 500 index (NYSEARCA: SPY ). I follow some fundamental factors for every sector and compare them to historical averages, so as to create a synthetic dashboard with a Value Score (V-score) and a Quality Score (Q-score). The choice of the valuation ratios has been justified here . The Q-score uses the Return on Equity (see why here ). In this series you can find numbers that may be useful in a top-down approach. There is no individual stock analysis or recommendations. You can refine your research reading articles by industry experts here . Methodology The median value of 4 valuation ratios is calculated for S&P 500 companies in each sector: Price/Earnings (P/E), Forward Price Earning for the current year (Fwd P/E), Price to sales (P/S), Price to free cash flow (P/FCF). It is compared to its own historical average Avg. The difference is measured in percentage (%Hist). For example, %Hist= 10 means that the current median ratio is 10% overpriced relative to its historical average in the sector. The V-score of a sector is the average of %Hist for the 4 factors, multiplied by -1, so that the higher is the better. The Q-score is the difference between the current median ROE (return on equity) and its historical average. Why and how using median values Median values are simpler than capital-weighted averages or aggregate ratios on each sector considered a mega company. They are also better reference data than averages for stock-picking. Each number in the table below is the middle point of a sector data set, which can be used to separate the good elements and the bad ones for the sector and the factor. Median values are also less sensitive to outliers than averages. A note of caution: for ETF investors, the most relevant valuation ratio would be the result of an aggregate calculation, neither a median value nor a capital-weighted average of individual stock factors. Example The next chart shows an example: the median P/E for all S&P 500 companies (updated on the week of publication). (click to enlarge) The latest value is compared to the average of the reference period to calculate %Hist. Sector valuation table on 12/14/2015 The next table reports the median valuation ratios. For example, the P/E column gives the current median value of P/E in each sector. The next “Avg” column gives its average between January 1999 and August 2015, which is my arbitrary reference of fair valuation. The next “%Hist” column is the difference between the historical average and the current value, in percentage. So there are 3 columns relative to P/E, and also 3 for each ratio. The first column “V-score” shows the value score as defined above. V-score P/E Avg %Hist Fwd P/E Avg %Hist P/S Avg %Hist P/FCF Avg %Hist All -18.48 21.15 19.18 10.27 16.6 14.83 11.94 2.16 1.58 36.71 28.41 24.7 15.02 Cons.Disc. -19.48 20.07 18.7 7.33 15.99 14.56 9.82 1.61 1.12 43.75 27.52 23.52 17.01 Cons.Stap. -31.01 25.6 20.48 25.00 19.57 16.27 20.28 2.33 1.54 51.30 50.06 39.28 27.44 Energy -7.36 20.31 17.8 14.10 25.89 14.38 80.04 1.48 1.94 -23.71 18.05 30.59 -40.99 Financials -36.60 18.19 16.16 12.56 14.77 12.38 19.31 2.81 2.03 38.42 21.59 12.26 76.10 Healthcare -6.04 27.92 23.76 17.51 16.3 16.85 -3.26 3.38 2.93 15.36 28.41 30.04 -5.43 Industrials -10.82 18.66 18.75 -0.48 16.15 14.52 11.23 1.47 1.24 18.55 29.25 25.66 13.99 I.T. & Tel. 2.22 24.79 27.16 -8.73 16.47 19.29 -14.62 3.17 2.72 16.54 25.48 26.02 -2.08 Materials -19.35 22.41 19.74 13.53 16.92 14.36 17.83 1.37 1.15 19.13 34.94 27.53 26.92 Utilities -27.66 17.63 15.21 15.91 15.81 13.15 20.23 1.63 1.11 46.85 Energy: P/FCF Avg starts in 2000 – Utilities: P/FCF not taken into account because of frequent outliers in this sector. V-score chart Sector quality table The next table gives a score for each sector relative to its own historical average. Here, only one factor is accounted. Q-score (Diff) Median ROE Avg All -0.50 14.43 14.93 Cons.Disc. 3.99 21.33 17.34 Cons.Stap. -2.86 21.2 24.06 Energy -14.14 0.75 14.89 Financials -2.38 9.93 12.31 Healthcare -4.71 12.89 17.6 Industrials 2.90 19.85 16.95 I.T. & Tel. 1.88 14.99 13.11 Materials 4.85 18.74 13.89 Utilities -2.25 9.1 11.35 Q-score chart Interpretation The S&P 500 looks overpriced by about 18.5% relative to the historical reference period. Since last issue’s statistics (11/10): SPY is down by more than 2.5%. Overpricing has increased by about 1%. Quality is stable globally and for every sector. 4 sectors have improved in valuation: Energy, Consumer Discretionary, Consumer Staples and Industrials. The only attractive sector regarding these metrics is Technology (including Telecom). It looks underpriced and has a median ROE above the historical average. The least overpriced sector among the rest is Healthcare. The most overpriced sector is Financials. For Materials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary, a quality factor better than the historical average can justify at least a part of the overpricing. If you want to stay informed of my updates on this topic and other articles, click the “Follow” tab at the top of this article. Data: portfolio123