Tag Archives: alternative

FXG: Consumer Staples With Less Of The Consumer Staples

Summary The portfolio for FXG just doesn’t look right to me. The ETF uses fairly low allocations for some core consumer staple holdings. I’d like to see a heavier weighting for companies with massive market share or addictive products because those firms should be able to protect margins better. Investors should be seeking to improve their risk-adjusted returns. I’m a big fan of using ETFs to achieve the risk-adjusted returns relative to the portfolios that a normal investor can generate for themselves after trading costs. One of the funds that I’m considering is the First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX ETF (NYSEARCA: FXG ). I’ll be performing a substantial portion of my analysis along the lines of modern portfolio theory, so my goal is to find ways to minimize costs while achieving diversification to reduce my risk level. Expense Ratio The expense ratio for FXG is a fairly unappealing .67%, which leaves me feeling that there is some substantial room for improvement. Holdings I was able to grab a chart with all of the holdings for FXG: (click to enlarge) Is this really a consumer staples portfolio? Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG ) is only 1.68% of the portfolio? Altria Group (NYSE: MO ) is less than 1% of the portfolio? Costco (NASDAQ: COST ) is entirely absent from the portfolio. Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO ) and Pepsi (NYSE: PEP ) are entirely absent. When I’m looking at an ETF of consumer staples, I want to see products that people are going to buy regardless of what is happening in the economy. I’m not a fan of smoking, but I wouldn’t mind a substantial allocation to tobacco. For that matter, I would prefer a portfolio built on companies that have enormous market share and sell addictive products. The fundamental goal of creating a consumer staples allocation in the portfolio is to provide the portfolio with more protection from weakness in the economy. Despite the challenges with firms missing, I do think a large allocation to Tyson Foods (NYSE: TSN ) and ConAgra Foods (NYSE: CAG ) does make sense. There has been enough concentration in this part of the industry that the major players are controlling a large part of the market and are unlikely to be forced to take major price cuts even if the market enters another recession. Building the Portfolio This hypothetical portfolio has a moderately aggressive allocation for the middle-aged investor. Only 25% of the total portfolio value is placed in bonds and a fifth of that bond allocation is given to high-yield bonds. If the investor wants to treat an investment in an mREIT index as an investment in the underlying bonds that the individual mREITs hold, then the total bond allocation would be 35%. Given how substantially mREITs can deviate from book value, I’d rather consider the allocation as an equity position designed to create a very high yield. This portfolio is probably taking on more risk than would be appropriate for many retiring investors since a major recession could still hit this pretty hard. If the investor wanted to modify the portfolio to be more appropriate for retirement, the first place to start would be increasing the bond exposure at the cost of equity. However, the diversification within the portfolio is fairly solid. Long-term treasuries work nicely with major market indexes, and I’ve designed this hypothetical portfolio without putting in the allocation I normally would for equity REITs. An allocation is created for the mortgage REITs, which can offer some fairly nice diversification relative to the rest of the portfolio and they are a major source of yield in this hypothetical portfolio. The portfolio assumes frequent rebalancing which would be a problem for short-term trading outside of tax advantaged accounts unless the investor was going to rebalance by adding to their positions on a regular basis and allocating the majority of the capital towards whichever portions of the portfolio had been underperforming recently. Because a substantial portion of the yield from this portfolio comes from REITs and interest, I would favor this portfolio as a tax exempt strategy even if the investor was frequently rebalancing by adding new capital. The portfolio allocations can be seen below along with the dividend yields from each investment: Name Ticker Portfolio Weight Yield SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF SPY 35.00% 2.06% Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF XLY 10.00% 1.36% First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX ETF FXG 10.00% 1.60% Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF VWO 5.00% 3.17% First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX ETF FXU 5.00% 3.77% SPDR Barclays Capital Short Term High Yield Bond ETF SJNK 5.00% 5.45% PowerShares 1-30 Laddered Treasury Portfolio ETF PLW 20.00% 2.22% iShares Mortgage Real Estate Capped ETF REM 10.00% 14.45% Portfolio 100.00% 3.53% The next chart shows the annualized volatility and beta of the portfolio since April of 2012: (click to enlarge) A Quick Rundown of the Portfolio Using SJNK offers investors better yields from using short-term exposure to credit-sensitive debt. The yield on this is fairly nice, and due to the short duration of the securities, the volatility isn’t too bad. PLW on the other hand does have some material volatility, but a negative correlation to other investments allows it to reduce the total risk of the portfolio. FXG is used to make the portfolio overweight on consumer staples with a goal of providing more stability to the equity portion of the portfolio. FXU is used to create a small utility allocation for the portfolio to give it a higher dividend yield and help it produce more income. I find the utility sector often has some desirable risk characteristics that make it worth at least considering for an overweight representation in a portfolio. VWO is simply there to provide more diversification from being an international equity portfolio. While giving investors exposure to emerging markets, it is also offering a very solid dividend yield that enhances the overall income level from the portfolio. XLY offers investors higher expected returns in a solid economy at the cost of higher risk. Using it as more than a small weighting would result in too much risk for the portfolio, but as a small weighting, the diversification it offers relative to the core holding of SPY is eliminating most of the additional risk. REM is primarily there to offer a substantial increase in the dividend yield which is otherwise not very strong. The mREIT sector can be subject to some pretty harsh movements, and dividends from mREITs should not be the core source of income for an investor. However, they can be used to enhance the level of dividend income while investors wait for their other equity investments to increase dividends over the coming decades. If you want a really quick version to refer back to, I put together the following chart that really simplifies the role of each investment: Name Ticker Role in Portfolio SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF SPY Core of Portfolio Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF XLY Enhance Expected Returned First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX ETF FXG Reduce Beta of Portfolio Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF VWO Exposure to Foreign Markets First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX ETF FXU Enhance Dividends, Lower Portfolio Risk SPDR Barclays Capital Short Term High Yield Bond ETF SJNK Low Volatility with over 5% Yield PowerShares 1-30 Laddered Treasury Portfolio ETF PLW Negative Beta Reduces Portfolio Risk iShares Mortgage Real Estate Capped ETF REM Enhance Current Income Risk Contribution The risk contribution category demonstrates the amount of the portfolio’s volatility that can be attributed to that position. Despite TLT being fairly volatile and tying SPY for the second highest volatility in the portfolio, it actually produces a negative risk contribution because it has a negative correlation with most of the portfolio. It is important to recognize that the “risk” on an investment needs to be considered in the context of the entire portfolio. To make it easier to analyze how risky each holding would be in the context of the portfolio, I have most of these holdings weighted at a simple 10%. Because of TLT’s heavy negative correlation, it receives a weighting of 20% and as the core of the portfolio SPY was weighted as 50%. Correlation The chart below shows the correlation of each ETF with each other ETF in the portfolio. Blue boxes indicate positive correlations and tan box indicate negative correlations. Generally speaking lower levels of correlation are highly desirable and high levels of correlation substantially reduce the benefits from diversification. (click to enlarge) Conclusion FXG has resisted weakness in the market as demonstrated by both the lower annual volatility and the lower max “drawdown” of -9.8% relative to the market’s worst performance of -11.9%. Despite that, the portfolio composition simply does not match the way I would want the consumer staples exposure constructed. Simply put, the portfolio does not offer strong enough allocations to some of the companies that have both enormous market share and addictive products. Heavy allocations to a few food companies look solid, but I’d rather see less of the convenience stores and more of the major retail low cost leaders such as Costco and Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT ). Even if WMT is having a rough time lately, it is a long-lived dividend champion with a large market share and powerful economies of scale. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: Information in this article represents the opinion of the analyst. All statements are represented as opinions, rather than facts, and should not be construed as advice to buy or sell a security. Ratings of “outperform” and “underperform” reflect the analyst’s estimation of a divergence between the market value for a security and the price that would be appropriate given the potential for risks and returns relative to other securities. The analyst does not know your particular objectives for returns or constraints upon investing. All investors are encouraged to do their own research before making any investment decision. Information is regularly obtained from Yahoo Finance, Google Finance, and SEC Database. If Yahoo, Google, or the SEC database contained faulty or old information it could be incorporated into my analysis.

Fund Liquidations: Salient, Ramius And Raylor

By DailyAlts Staff In this edition of Fund Liquidations, notes on four funds that have filed for liquidation: Salient Alternative Beta Fund In a September 2 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Salient MF Trust said its Board of Trustees had approved a plan to liquidate the Salient Alternative Beta Fund (MUTF: SABFX ). The liquidation date was slated for just a day later, on September 3, and the fund immediately stopped accepting investments from new shareholders. According to Bloomberg , September 14 was the fund’s last day of trading, and its shares closed at a final price of $6.96. The fund debuted in March 2013 at a price of $10.14. Ramius Hedged Alpha Fund The Ramius Hedged Alpha Fund (MUTF: RDRAX ) was liquidated on September 4. Its Board of Trustees made the decision to liquidate in July and notified the SEC of its intentions on July 31. According to Bloomberg , the fund debuted on September 17, 2010 at a share price of $10.02, and closed September 4, 2015 at $8.78, down 11.4% since inception. Year-to-date, through its final day of trading, the Ramius Hedged Alpha Fund returned -11.9%. Ramius Strategic Volatility Fund Ramius also liquidated the Ramius Strategic Volatility Fund (MUTF: RVOAX ) on September 4, after filing its intent to do so with the SEC on July 31. The fund, which debuted in October 2012 at $10 per share, finished its final day of trading at $2.64, down a staggering 73.6% since its inception, according to Bloomberg . The fund closed out 2014 at $3.09, meaning its year-to-date returns through its closing were -14.6%. Raylor Managed Futures Strategy Fund According to a September 9 SEC filing , the Board of Trustees of the Northern Lights Fund Trust III has decided to cease operations of the Raylor Managed Futures Strategy Fund (MUTF: TMFAX ). Effective immediately, management stopped selling shares to new investors and warned its existing shareholders that it would begin to deviate from the fund’s investment objective, in pursuit to a liquidation of the fund planned for October 9. Shares of the Raylor Managed Futures Strategy Fund returned -8.76% in the first eight months of 2015, according to Morningstar, ranking it in the bottom 8% of funds in its category. Over the six months concluding August 31, the fund returned an even-worse -11.55%. Share this article with a colleague

Why Exelon Remains A Buy

Summary EXC has increased its presence in the regulated segment, with a focus on acquisitions. The EPA’s decision works in favor of Exelon. The company has a low valuation and good performance with a regular dividend payout. I have long been bullish on Exelon Corp. (NYSE: EXC ) given its clean energy portfolio, major presence in the U.S. utility market, low valuation, and dividend growth. The company has a market capitalization value of $27 billion and delivered revenues of approximately $27.4 billion in 2014. The company is engaged in the production, sales, and transmission of energy. The stock declined in line with other large U.S. utilities like Southern Company (NYSE: SO ), Dominion Resources (NYSE: D ), and Duke Energy (NYSE: DUK ). However, what gives EXC an edge when compared to the other utilities is its large fleet of green assets. Exelon Nuclear operates the largest nuclear fleet in the nation and the third largest fleet in the world. With the utility industry coming under increasing EPA pressure to reduce carbon emissions, EXC is set to outperform as its nuclear plants emit zero greenhouse gases. Furthermore, the company’s focus on regulated markets, its increased infrastructure improvements, increasing renewable energy asset base, and low valuation make it a buy in my view. Why I Like Exelon 1. Large, Clean Asset Base — The company operates a large low-cost and low-carbon generation fleet across the U.S. Exelon owns more than 35 GW of power generating capacity with less than 10% of its capacity coming from thermal power plants. The other utility companies are predominantly dependent on coal for their power generation. What I like about Exelon is its large clean asset base, which in my view is one of the biggest strengths of the company. It has one of the largest portfolios of solar and wind energy farms. Other than its large nuclear energy fleet, the company also owns and operates the following: More than 1.2 GW of the wind energy portfolio Exelon City Solar, the largest urban solar installation in the United States Four hydroelectric power plants 2. EPA Decision Taxing on Dirty Coal — The U.S. has already finalized its clean power plan , which focuses on cutting carbon emission from power plants. By 2030, the clean power plan will reduce carbon emissions by 32% below 2005 levels. All 50 states have utilities working toward establishing a cleaner and efficient power system using renewable energy. This decision by the EPA will be problematic for utilities relying on coal for their power production. 3. Good Dividend Yield — The company declared a regular quarterly dividend of 31 cents per share. Utility stock owners are mostly interested in a high, stable and growing dividend yield. Utilities attract investors for their stable dividend. If utilities’ stock prices fall, the dividend yield goes up. EXC has a dividend yield of 4.18%. 4. Focus on Regulated Markets — In the wake to overcome current weakness in the energy market, the company is slowly shifting its focus toward the more regulated segment of the market. The company has plans to invest $15 billion in BGE, ComEd and PECO (Exelon’s utilities) between 2014 and 2018. This will ensure stable earnings. Exelon is also expanding its footprint in the natural gas business. The company acquired Integrys Energy Group , with regulated natural gas and electric utility operations. 5. Lower Valuation — EXC stock has a P/B of 1.2x and P/S of 0.9x , which is lower than the industry average of 1.7x and 1.3x, respectively. The lower valuations are due to its lower operating ratios, compared to the general utility industry. Its operating margin at 15.5% is lower than industry average at 21.6%, while its net margin at 7.9% is also lower than the average. The reason for the lower margins is the company’s dependence on wholesale markets where prices have been low over the past few years. Its nuclear power plants have suffered from the low prices. The valuation multiples are also lower than the bigger utility companies. Market Cap ($ billions) P/S P/B Exelon 27 0.9 1.2 Dominion Resources 41.3 3.4 3.3 Duke Energy 48 2.1 1.2 Southern Co. 39.5 2.2 2 Source: Figures from Morningstar. 6. Good Recent Quarter Performance — The company reported a quarterly EPS of 59 cents per share, exceeding its guidance for Q2 2015. The company expects Q3 2015 earnings of $0.65 to $0.75 per share and has narrowed its full-year guidance range from $2.25 to $2.55 per share to $2.35 to $2.55 per share. Exelon has shown considerable improvement across all segments in quarterly revenues and net income when compared to Q2 2014, as can be seen below. (click to enlarge) (Note: Figures in millions.) 7. Exelon & Pepco Merger — In April 2014, Exelon announced its merger with Pepco Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: POM ) in an all-cash transaction. This would have led to the emergence of a leading Mid-Atlantic electric and gas utility. This was a good move by Exelon, as it would expand its regulated holdings and thus strengthen its earnings stability. It was a win-win situation for both companies. This merger recently faced heat from D.C. regulators. However, the companies will appeal the decision and analysts believe there is a 50-50 chance of the merger taking place. I think the merger should go through given its financial benefits for customers . Risks — Nuclear Base Risk While nuclear energy has its advantages in the form of no carbon emissions and low costs, it is still facing a lot of criticism worldwide given its danger of radiation accidents. However, Japan has recently restarted its nuclear power four years after Fukushima. Exelon spends nearly $1 billion annually on its nuclear plants to keep them operating safely and reliably. — Increasing Bond Yields Utility stocks can lose their attraction to yield investors as long-term bond yields rise. With the Federal Reserve expected to raise interest rates this year, bond yields are likely to increase. This will pressurize utility stocks that have benefited from the zero rate interest environment in the past few years. Stock Performance The stock is currently trading at $31.5, which is higher than its 52- week low. The company has a market capitalization value of more than $27 billion. The stock has lost 17% of its value since 2015 . Conclusion Exelon will benefit from the increasing demand for clean electricity in the near future. Though the company is facing various economic challenges in the form of low natural gas and power prices, it is trying to cover up its weaknesses through investments and M&A opportunities. The new EPA rules will improve EXC’s competitive position as compared to other utilities. I remain bullish on the stock given its growing commitments in the regulated markets, its large, clean asset base, its low valuation, and its good dividend yield. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.