Author Archives: Scalper1

Cord-Cutting Trend Continues To Hit Pay-TV Providers

As cord cutting continues to accelerate among millennials, pay-TV providers are feeling the pain. The largest pay-TV providers in the U.S., representing 95% of the market, lost about 190,000 video subscribers in Q3 2015, up from a loss of about 155,000 subscribers in 3Q 2014, reports Leichtman Research Group. The largest pay-TV providers account for 94 million subscribers. The biggest hit was on the cable-TV group. They collectively lost 145,000

Oxford Lane Capital And Eagle Point Keep Churning Out The Cash, While High Yield Market Jitters Drag Down NAVs

Summary As high yield bond and corporate loan markets continue to be hammered by nervous investors, funds like OXLC and ECC have seen their NAVs drop even more. This is a natural result of their leverage, but essentially is irrelevant to their ability to generate cash flow and make their dividend payments. These are tough vehicles for some retail investors to understand and appreciate, but offer impressive income potential to those willing to make the effort. As the proverbial blood continues to run in the streets of the high yield bond and leveraged loan markets (because of a range of fears related to the Fed increasing rates, the world economy slump, etc.) the non-investment grade companies that comprise those markets continue to go about their business, making their interest and principal payments. This translates into strong cash flows and high distributions for Oxford Lane Capital Corporation (NASDAQ: OXLC ) and Eagle Point Credit (NYSE: ECC ), the two closed end funds that specialize in buying collateralized loan obligations (“CLO’s”). CLO’s are leveraged, special purpose vehicles that function like “virtual banks,” buying and holding senior, secured floating-rate loans to non-investment grade companies. (This is the same cohort of companies that issues high-yield bonds. But whereas high-yield bonds are unsecured and typically recover only 20-30% in the event of the issuer’s default, senior secured loans have historically recovered 70-80% in the event of default, so the overall credit loss on a portfolio of loans over time is less than half the credit loss on a portfolio of high yield bonds.) Both ECC and OXLC put out quarterly reports yesterday and followed up with investor conference calls this morning. In both cases the messages were similar, that the market for the assets they hold – CLOs and the loans held by CLOs – are way down, the cash flows from those assets continue strong, and the reinvestment opportunities for CLOs in the loan market are very attractive. But the strong income prospects this represents (OXLC yields over 22% and ECC over 14%) are not enough to offset the fears of many closed end fund investors, who remain fixated on the net asset values (NAVs) of both funds. These have dropped in recent months to reflect the depressed markets for their underlying assets. Here is why the NAV of a CLO fund would drop as the market for its underlying assets drops. Suppose the equity in a typical CLO is leveraged 10 times. If the market for the loans held by that CLO drops by 1%, then the mark-to-market or “paper loss” to the equity of the CLO will be 10 times 1%, or 10%. This means that investors should not be surprised to see NAVs of ECC or OXLC fall at about ten times the rate as the drop in market prices in the loan market. None of the drop however, has any relation to the ability of the portfolio to generate the cash needed to pay distributions. Investors who can understand that and be comfortable with it can appreciate the opportunity these funds represent for income investors. But be prepared for a potentially volatile ride in terms of market value, although many of us who have owned the funds for awhile may feel – given the current entry point versus where we got in – that today’s new investors will have a smoother ride than we did.

SCHX: Low Fees Just Got Lower And The Portfolio Is Still Great

Summary SCHX is a leader among low fee ETFs. This balanced portfolio works great as a core holding. The fund holds most of the major companies in the domestic market, so diversification should focus on bonds, international exposure, and REITs. One of my favorite funds that is not currently in my portfolio is the U.S. Large-Cap ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHX ). This fund offers investors exposure to the domestic equity market and has a rock bottom exposure of .04%. Or at least, I used to think .04% was the lowest investors would find on domestic equity. It turns out Schwab is in a pricing battle with BlackRock’s (NYSE: BLK ) iShares products and will be lowering the expense ratio from .04% to .03%. What does SCHX do? SCHX attempts to track the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. At least 90% of funds are invested in companies that are part of the index. SCHX falls under the category of “Large Blend.” Largest Holdings The portfolio has solid diversification. The SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF ( SPY) is holding a very similar portfolio but with a slightly larger allocation to the top companies, such as 3.55% in Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ). However, the additional diversification for SCHX can be partially set off by some of the companies near the top being less volatile or by the ETF having less trading volume. (click to enlarge) Perhaps the question should be why investors would choose options with higher expense ratios when the holdings in SCHX make so much sense. The huge holdings here are established dividend growth champions, which the exception of AAPL and Facebook (NASDAQ: FB ), however I suspect that within 10 years those companies will have a very solid history of raising their dividends. Sector The one thing that concerns me about the way the fund is set up is the relatively light weights given to utilities and to consumer staples. I feel that makes this portfolio a little more aggressive than I prefer to be with the core of my portfolio. (click to enlarge) The reason these sectors are so appealing to me has everything to do with where we are in the macroeconomic sector. We’ve been in a prolonged bull market for quite a while and the valuations have started to get fairly rich. The Federal Reserve has given clear signs that they are desperate to raise rates, but I don’t foresee them being able to raise rates more than once or twice because the international rates are so low. If the Federal Reserve does manage to raise rates, I would be concerned about it creating headwinds for the domestic equity market and the possibility of establishing a new recession. To guard against that risk without having to sell out of the market, I prefer to increase the allocation to the more defensive sectors. Utilities benefit from functioning as regulated monopolies which allows them to expect to earn a fairly steady rate of return. Their prices do move up and down with bonds which would make higher bond yields suggest that utility prices might go down, but the utilities also offer dividend yields that are often superior to the bond yields and they benefit from increasing dividends in most years. That creates a very compelling risk/reward proposition and gives investors a solid reason to favor adding a utility allocation to their portfolio when using SCHX as the core. Consumer staples benefits from having established positions and selling products that consumers buy in good times and bad times. For instance, the tobacco industry has been a great source of returns for the consumer staples sector and continues to create sales regardless of what is happening in the market. My estimates on reasonable allocations for consumer staples and utilities for a highly risk-averse investor would be running as high as 40% of the domestic equity position. Since these sectors only give us 9.1% and 3.0%, that would require investors to specifically add exposure to the portfolio. Meanwhile they could use a fund like SCHX for another 40% of the domestic equity allocation. I would want the remaining 20% of the domestic position for REITs. Investors looking for an easy way to invest in the consumer staples sector may want to consider the Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (NYSEARCA: VDC ) as a solid partner for working with SCHX in a portfolio. For utilities, I would suggest the Vanguard Utilities ETF (NYSEARCA: VPU ). Conclusion SCHX is a very strong contender to be a core holding in the new portfolio. I wanted a replacement for SPY that I would be able to trade without commissions. Of course, I also wanted to see a lower expense ratio, and SCHX delivered that. I like the idea of combining a large cap fund like this with domestic positions in consumer staples and utilities to create a more defensive weighting since the market has been in a prolonged bull period and the price/earnings ratios have become fairly rich. Prices have dipped back down since late summer, but now investors are facing the possibility of weaker earnings in 2016 which could offset the reduction in price.