Author Archives: Scalper1

Nontraditional Bond Funds: The Best And Worst Of October

By DailyAlts Staff Nontraditional bond funds bounced back from September’s losses of 1.04% to post a 0.73% aggregate gain in October, according to Morningstar. In addition to the category swinging from losses to gains, the best-performing nontraditional bond funds posted bigger gains in October than September, and the worst-performing funds posted lighter losses. What follows is a recap of last month’s best and worst performers, concluding with a follow-up report on September’s standout funds. (click to enlarge) Top Performing Funds in October The PIMCO Floating Income Fund (MUTF: PFIIX ) was October’s top-performing nontraditional bond fund, gaining 3.19% for the month. In September, PFIIX was one of the category’s three worst performers, falling 2.80%. The fund’s rebounding performance was emblematic of the nontraditional bond category’s swing from loss to profit in October, but despite its solid gains for the month, PFIIX was still down 2.69% for the twelve months ending October 31. Over longer periods, its returns have been more attractive: The fund’s three- and five-year annualized returns of 1.34% and 2.25%, respectively, besting the category averages of 1.00% and 2.11%. PFIIX debuted in 2005 and has $657.4 million in assets under management (“AUM”). The second-best nontraditional bond fund to own in October was the WHV/ Acuity Tactical Credit Long/Short Fund (MUTF: WHAIX ), which returned +3.11% for the month. The fund launched on December 16, 2014, so it still didn’t have a one-year return as of October 31. For the first ten months of 2015, WHAIX boasted impressive gains of 8.01%, ranking at the very top of the category. Its AUM recently stood at $52.5 million. October’s third-best nontraditional bond fund – for the second month in a row – was the Robinson Tax Advantaged Income Fund (MUTF: ROBNX ), which added gains of 3.02% on top of the previous month’s 1.04%. The fund, which originally launched on September 30 of last year and has $64.1 million in AUM, returned +2.86% for the year ending October 31. (click to enlarge) Worst Performing Funds in October The Parametric Absolute Return Fund (MUTF: EOAIX ) was the worst-performing nontraditional bond fund in October, falling 3.45%. EOAIX, which launched in 2010, generated gains of 3.38% in the first ten months of 2015, but lost 4.20% for the three months ending October 31. The fund has $29.6 million in AUM. The Palmer Square Long/Short Credit (MUTF: PCHIX ) and the Legg Mason Alternative Credit (MUTF: LMANX ) funds were the category’s next-worst performers in October, posting respective losses of 2.45% and 1.85%. Of the two, PCHIX is the smaller and younger fund, with $20.6 million in AUM and a November 2014 launch date, compared to LMANX’s $789.5 million AUM and August 2010 debut. PCHIX’s losses have also been steeper over the three- and ten-month periods ending October 31, at 4.73% and 7.28%, respectively; compared to LMANX’s lighter losses of 3.77% and 5.21%. (click to enlarge) September’s Best and Worst: Follow-Up As previously stated, September’s third-best and third-worst nontraditional bond funds found their way into October’s top three – but what happened to the #1 and 2 best- and worst-performers from the prior month? The best nontraditional bond funds in September were the Cedar Ridge Unconstrained Credit Fund (MUTF: CRUMX ) and the Forward Credit Analysis Long/Short Fund (MUTF: FLSIX ), both of which returned +1.07%. In October, CRUMX posted gains but underperformed at +0.58% compared to the category average of +0.74%. FLSIX outperformed, gaining 0.94% for the month. The Highland Opportunistic Credit Fund (MUTF: HNRAX ) was September’s worst performer by a longshot, falling 7.2%. The month’s next-worst fund, the Fortress Long/Short Credit Fund (MUTF: LPLIX ), posted comparatively lighter losses of 3.17%. In October, HNRAX was able to eke out a 0.07% gain – still well under the category average – while LPLIX outperformed with an impressive gain of 1.29%.

Which Markets Currently Offer Value And Which Are Best To Avoid?

Summary Analysis of world equity indices can give an idea as to which equity markets provide good investment opportunities and which are best to avoid. Currently, investors should be very alert about investments, particularly on British, Brazilian, Canadian, Mexican and Russian stock exchanges. On the other hand, Chinese H-Shares, South Korean and Vietnamese equities have the capacity for a positive surprise. However, the indisputably best investment opportunity seems to lie in Japan as Abenomics is in full swing. As globalization and new technologies evolve, differences between individual countries are inevitably diminishing. Greater interconnectedness causes local risks to easily spread around the globe and short-term profit opportunities to be quickly seized. However, investors can still find long-term economic moats if they fully understand the underlying timeless principles of equity investing. First of all, they have to realize that the progress of the fundamental value of an investment is strongly correlated with earnings of that investment in the long run. Therefore, investors should focus their attention in this direction and not get fooled by any incidental events. Second, it absolutely crucial to know by heart Warren Buffett’s famous mantra: ,,Price is what you pay, value is what you get.” And third, be aware that proper diversification is a must, otherwise you may face a nervous breakdown in this rapidly changing world. Recently, in light of growing economic and geopolitical tensions, I have been thinking about the geographical allocation of my portfolio. In order to complement broadly discussed issues in financial media, I decided to identify which markets currently offer generally good investment opportunities based on valuation multiples, return on equity and earnings growth analysis of major world equity indices. Price-To-Earnings Looking at the comparison of current PE ratios below, we quickly spot Russian MICEX and several Asian indices among the lower multiples on the left side of the chart and Mexican Mexbol, Brazilian Bovespa and British FTSE on the right side of the chart with higher multiples. Even though PE ratio is widely used valuation metric, it has limitations and hence should be taken with caution. Current Enterprise Value To Trailing Twelve Months EBITDA Especially in the cases of Russia and China, PE indicators may be very misleading since we have heard that the recent Chinese stock frenzy was largely fueled by borrowed money. As a better valuation indicator can then serve EV/EBITDA ratio as it adequately accounts for the level of leverage. Compared to the previous chart, we can clearly observe the shift of Chinese A-Shares index Shanghai Composite to the expensive zone of the chart. Nevertheless, notice that Chinese H-Shares index Hang Seng remained on the relatively cheap side of the chart. Price-To-Book P/B is another popular financial ratio used to gauge market valuation of a stock. However, some assets may be not worth buying even when they trade below their book value. Although Russian equities are boasting with extremely low valuation multiples, they are cheap for good reason. The stiffness of the local business environment and the risk of losing the whole investment due to eventual nationalization of assets are simply too high. Return On Common Equity Moreover, Russian equities together with Brazilian, Canadian and British have the lowest Return on Equity in the given sample. ROE is an important profitability measure and a critical weapon in many value investors’ arsenals. In 1972, Buffett implied that he desires a rate of return on equity of at least 14%. Nine years later, he identified the average rate of return on equity of American companies at 11%. To the last day of October this year, ROE of the S&P 500 totaled 12.5%. 3 Years Earnings CAGR Because of the strong relationship between earnings and market prices in the long-term, one should also assess earnings growth. The following chart captures earnings growth (in %) for the most recent 3 continuous years, ending on the last trading day of October 2015. As you can see, profitability of Russian, Brazilian, British, Canadian and Mexican companies suffered significant losses in recent years, while several Asian indices led the earnings growth. Undoubtedly the most notable rise in earnings was recorded in Japan as the yen heavily depreciated during the given period. Japanese economic miracle 2.0? The fact that the Japanese economy is slowly heating up after long period of deflationary pressures has already been noticed by several renowned economic journals . In order to spur the yet fragile economic recovery, Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe last week rolled out additional fiscal stimulus. Whether we will witness the second ‘Japanese economic miracle’ can be hardly predicted, but for now, it is quite obvious that Abenomics has considerably changed the course of the third largest world economy. Furthermore, most of Abe’s reforms greatly emphasize the importance of corporate efficiency with a particular focus on ROE. This could help Japanese shares move even higher in the upcoming years. The Bottom Line Probably the best way how to invest in a country’s equity market is through some ETF. The most liquid ETFs with exposure to Japan’s equity market are the iShares MSCI Japan ETF (NYSEARCA: EWJ ) and Japan Hedged Equity Fund (NYSEARCA: DXJ ). Based on the comparison charts above, Chinese H-Shares seem to be surprisingly a good value play even despite the concerns about a slowdown of the Chinese economy. Favorite ETFs consisting of securities listed on the Hong Kong stock exchange include the iShares China Large-Cap ETF (NYSEARCA: FXI ), iShares MSCI China Index Fund (NYSEARCA: MCHI ), SPDR S&P China ETF (NYSEARCA: GXC ) and Guggenheim China Small Cap ETF (NYSEARCA: HAO ). South Korean equities also do not look bad and could be substantially boosted by potential monetary response of local central bank as I wrote about earlier this year . ETFs that could eventually thrive are the iShares MSCI South Korea Capped ETF (NYSEARCA: EWY ), Deutsche X-trackers MSCI South Korea Hedged Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: DBKO ) and the WisdomTree Korea Hedged Equity ETF (NASDAQ: DXKW ). However, not all country ETFs suitably track broad equity indices’ fundamentals. For example, the only ETF providing sole exposure to the Vietnamese equity market – Market Vectors Vietnam ETF (NYSEARCA: VNM ) – mismatches the returns of the national stock market index Vietnam Ho Chi Minh Stock Index (VN Index) by a great deal. Hence, thorough analysis of specific investment instrument should never be neglected as it can easily hamper your original investment objective. With respect to high valuations and weak profitability, the most popular ETFs that should be shorted or avoided by long-only investors are the iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (NYSEARCA: EWU ), iShares MSCI Canada ETF (NYSEARCA: EWC ), iShares MSCI Mexico Capped ETF (NYSEARCA: EWW ), Market Vectors Russia ETF (NYSEARCA: RSX ) and iShares MSCI Brazil Capped ETF (NYSEARCA: EWZ ). Note: All presented figures in the charts were exported from Bloomberg Terminal as of 10/30/2015.