Yahoo (YHOO) investors “are sentenced to another year of fumbling and uncertainty” now that the Web portal has canceled the spinoff of its valuable stake in China ecommerce giant Alibaba (BABA) and will pursue spinning off its core business instead, according to an industry report on Thursday from Edison Investment Research analyst Richard Windsor. “The rationale behind this change is simply that spinning Alibaba carries a risk of substantial
Barron’s recently had a favorable write up on closed end funds that one way or another use a covered call strategy as a means of providing income. The article proposes that volatile markets like now are a good environment for this niche and that the call premium can help mitigate the impact of large declines. I think both points are flat out wrong. The history here is that they do well in rising markets. By Roger Nusbaum, AdvisorShares ETF Strategist Barron’s recently had a favorable write up on closed end funds that one way or another use a covered call strategy as a means of providing income. Where the article focused on CEFs, the yields can be quite high because of the leverage that CEFs often use as well as returning capital, when necessary to maintain a payout. It is also worth noting that there are traditional funds that sell calls and ETFs that sell calls and puts too for that matter. I wrote about these quite a few times in the early days of Random Roger. The history of them shows long stretches where they do very well then long periods where they get pounded and then repeats. Based on chart below they got crushed in 2008 and the dividends were cut on many of them and neither the prices or payouts have recovered since. The article tries to make the case that volatile markets like now are a good environment for this niche and that the call premium can help mitigate the impact of large declines. I think both points are flat out wrong. The history here is that they do well in rising markets. The chart from Google Finance captures a whole bunch of them over a ten-year period. I removed the symbols for compliance reasons but finding funds in this space should be easy to do. If you play around with the time periods you will see they did very well in 2006 and far into 2007, 2009 well into 2010 and then a three year run from 2012-2014. As mentioned the got crushed during the bear market, did badly in 2011 and are having mixed results in 2015. (click to enlarge) I would have no expectation that these funds can buffer a stock market decline. These are income vehicles but they track the equity market higher to an extent (they correlate but don’t keep up) and I would bet they get hit hard in the next bear market but probably not as hard as 2008. Part of the equation in 2008 was a shutting down of bond markets which impacted CEFs in terms of accessing leverage. I don’t expect that to repeat but I would want sell in the face of a bear market as a 30% decline seems plausible for these funds in a down 40% world. Obviously there would be income vehicles to keep in a bear market but I don’t think these are one of them. Where they do well, then do poorly, they will do well again, maybe after the next bear market maybe sooner but anyone interested in this space probably needs to be willing to be tactical and be willing to sell after a period of their doing well. Interest rates have a very good chance of remaining inadequate for many years even if the Fed does hike rates this month. Attempting to be tactical is not right for everyone but I do think that the way investors get their yield will probably include market segments that require a more active and tactical approach.
Do you know what FANG stands for? If you don’t, you should – it makes an impact on your investments in ways you might not realize. FANG stocks mask the fact that the overall tech sector is under pressure compared to other indexes. 12/10/2015 You might have started hearing the word “FANG” thrown around in recent months and have questions on what it means. Like many terms before it, such as BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China), FANG is a recently-coined term associated with Facebook (NASDAQ: FB ), Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN ), Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX ), and Google (NASDAQ: GOOG ). The performance of these stocks has been nothing short of impressive this year (avg. +87% return year-to-date), but what’s more important is the FANG’s impact on other investments, such as the NASDAQ ETF (NASDAQ: QQQ ). Though investors think they might be diversifying by owning ETFs, the FANG stocks make up about 20% of the ETF’s composition. When we include Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ) and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT ), that number increases to 41%. So when you think about diversification, remember that over 40% of your investment is allocated to just six companies. This has been a pretty great issue to have this year, but it’s important to realize this before choosing your investments. More importantly, this heavy allocation into six companies skews what on face value looks like relatively great performance out of the NASDAQ this year: As you can see, the NASDAQ (less the top six stocks) has significantly underperformed the other major indexes. When you consider this index is weighted more towards growth/technology companies, and that mutual funds are beginning to write down private venture investments , its paints a much bleaker picture on tech’s ability to maintain its high multiples going forward. Additionally, as ETFs become an increasing larger portion of the market, the FANG stock may begin to move based on overall market buying/selling of indexes. Just something to keep an eye on….and now you know FANG. The Actionable Insight Take : With poor performance out of recent IPOs like Square (NYSE: SQ ), the write-downs of private investments in “unicorn” stocks, and general weak performance out of the NASDAQ this year, we are growing increasingly concerned about valuation in the tech sector. If the market were to start rotating into lower-risk stocks, many of the currently unprofitable “unicorns” would probably have a high likelihood of a sell-off. On the FANG front, we tend to prefer Google for its mix of growth and value, its profitability and strong balance sheet, and its opportunities to grow new, valuable businesses in the future (Google fiber, autonomous cars, expansion of YouTube, etc.). We commend Netflix for its transition into media production to offset the risk of rising content costs, but we fear the risk of miss-hits in production (something all producers eventually face). We think NFLX could take pricing here and there is ample room to grow internationally, but at its current price we think some of that is already priced in. Next week, I’ll be skiing in Utah, so stay on the lookout for my special skiing edition of Actionable Insights Last, as a shameless plug, it was announced this morning that my recent write-up on Ross Stores (NASDAQ: ROST ) came in 4th place in Seeking Alpha’s retail ideas contest . You can find the write-up here . Actionable Insights is a daily newsletter written by Shaun Currie, CFA, which aims to provide investors with quick, educational updates on market news with insights on possible investment opportunities. Periodically, Actionable Insights will also contribute longer investment ideas that the author produces for clients and the general public. Follow me to get notified when updates and articles are posted.