Author Archives: Scalper1

Fossil Free ETFs Head To Head: ETHO Vs. SPYX

Pollution and global warming caused by fossil fuel has been on the rise lately. Global superpowers are leaving no stone unturned to restrict greenhouse emissions, protect the climate and go eco-friendly. President Obama has always been active in cleaning up carbon pollution. A proposed Environmental Protection Agency rule even seeks to reduce 30% carbon emission from power plants by 2030, compared to the levels in 2005. China announced its intent to build a pollution-free environment. And as part of this mission, the president of China and the U.S. president Barack Obama struck a deal to lessen carbon emissions (read: Fight Global Warming with These ETFs ). The agreement calls for carbon emission reductions by 26% to 28% in the U.S. by 2025. It also includes the first-ever commitment by China to stop emissions from growing by 2030. Not only from the social perspective, it has also been noticed that fossil fuels cast a dark shadow on economies and the associated stock markets. The latest theory is that this monster can ” cause job losses, recessions and even a tumbling stock market” according to economists. It is perhaps because of this grave concern that we received two fossil-fuel ETFs from issuers, namely, the Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (NYSEARCA: ETHO ) and the SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Free ETF ( SPYX ) within just one month. Below we detail these two funds and highlight their key differences: ETHO in Focus This new ETF has a 398-stock portfolio having a carbon emissions profile that is 50-70% lower per dollar invested than a conventional broad-based benchmark. The index studies total greenhouse gas emissions from over 5,000 equities to choose ‘climate leaders’ in each industry. No stock accounts for more than 0.63% of the basket. Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX ), M&T Bank Corp. (NYSE: MTB ) and Universal Display Corp. (NASDAQ: OLED ) are the top three holdings of the fund, which charges 75 bps in fees (read: How to Invest ‘Fossil-Free’ with This New ETF? ). Technology is the fund’s top priority with 23% exposure while industrial, consumer cyclical, financial and health care also have sizable weights. The fund puts 41% in mid-cap stocks while large caps rake in about 37% of the basket with the rest going to small-cap stocks. The fund has a tilt toward growth stocks with 57% exposure followed by 22% focus on blend and 21% in value stocks. SPYX in Focus The fund looks to tracks the S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Free Index which measures the performance of companies in the S&P 500 Index that do not own fossil fuel reserves. The 473-stock fund is heavy on Information Technology (22.37%). Financials, Health Care, Consumer Discretionary, Consumer Staples and Industrials have double-digit weight in the fund. No stock accounts for 3.92% of the portfolio. Apple takes the top position followed by Microsoft (2.60%) and General Electric (1.66%). The fund charges 20 bps in fees. Capitalization-wise, the fund puts about 90% in large caps. Here too, growth stocks take about 48% weight followed by value stocks (29%). ETHO SPYX Index The Etho Climate Leadership Index the S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Free Index Expense Ratio 0.75% 0.20% Company concentration risks Extremely low Relatively high Index composition Equal weighted Capitalization-weighted Capitalization Multi-Cap Large-cap Style Blend with a focus on growth (57%) Blend with a focus on growth (48%) Link to the original post on Zacks.com

Why I Will Likely Be A Buyer Of High Yield In 2016

The yield in junk bonds has been steadily rising as the price of the bonds in the underlying portfolio have been falling. The biggest concern in this fixed-income sector has been the decoupling from U.S. equity markets. From a psychological standpoint it seems like we have gone from complacency to extreme fear in a hurry. By now you have probably read everything about the death of high yield bonds, the investor lockup at Third Avenue, and the risk that these “junky” assets pose to exchange-traded funds. Believe me, the financial media is just getting started slicing and dicing this thing up. Everyone loves to sink their teeth into an investment that is tanking. It makes for great headlines and offers a curiously similar effect as gliding by an accident on the freeway. Despite our best intentions, we all slow down to take a peek. As an avid watcher and owner of ETFs , I have been closely monitoring the price action of the iShares iBoxx High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: HYG ) and the SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: JNK ) this year. These two ETFs represent the lions share of the below-investment grade fixed-income space, with combined assets of $25 billion. HYG is now down nearly 10% from its 2015 high and currently sports a 30-day SEC yield of 7.20%. That yield has been steadily rising as the price of the bonds in the underlying portfolio have been falling. The biggest concern in this fixed-income sector has been the decoupling from U.S. equity markets. The SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) is 5% off its high and still in the middle of its 52-week trading range, while high yield bonds continue to make new lows. That is uncharacteristic of the typical correlation between these two asset classes and has many wondering if stocks are going to follow lower or junk bonds will ultimately rebound. You would probably be hard pressed to find anyone admitting to owning these investments at this stage of the game. However, there are literally millions of investors who own some form of junk bonds. That may be through direct exposure in a fund such as HYG or indirectly through diversified corporate funds, aggregate indexes, bank loans, or a multi-asset fund structure. It’s become an ubiquitous part of the chase for yield over the last several years and far more common than most investors understand. From a psychological standpoint it seems like we have gone from complacency to extreme fear in a hurry. HYG peaked in April, yet the accelerated nature of the sharp sell off in the last six weeks has investors whipped up into a frenzy. This is the inner monologue that I imagine has taken place in many heads this year: HYG down 2% – “Bit of a sell-off here. Time to add to my holdings.” HYG down 4% – “Spreads are so juicy at these levels. I’ll nibble on a little more” HYG down 6% – “Well this turned ugly quickly. Maybe I bit off more than I can chew.” HYG down 8% – “Get me the hell out. Cash is king.” HYG down 9% – “Haha, who would be dumb enough to still hold this stuff? Glad I sold down here. Now I’m safe”‘ HYG down 10% – “Wow, look at it still cratering. Maybe I should go short….” That last one made me cringe as I saw several probing articles and social media anecdotes pointing out funds that short junk bonds last week. They certainly do exist, although if you are asking about them at this stage of the game, you are probably a little late to that trade. That’s just my personal opinion – things can always get worse, and we may still face a high volume capitulation event before a true bottom is formed. There are two important points that should be understood at this juncture: This whole thing is probably not as bad as everyone has made it out to be. The “bubble has burst” or “high yield is dead” is likely driven more by headline artists than true investors in this space. We see the same type of sentiment and conviction when stocks go through a 10% corrective event. It’s always the end of the world and yet somehow it’s not. The same psychological cycle of greed and fear that we are accustomed to in stocks is going to take place in this fixed-income sector as well. It will seem cataclysmic and disastrous until it reaches a point where everyone who is going to has sold. That will be the inflection point that will ultimately create a sustainable bottom and drive prices higher. It may be in the form of a V-shaped reversal or a more rounded consolidation that takes months to stabilize and swing higher. No one knows for sure when that inflection point may be. However, I’m closely watching technical indicators such as prior support levels, volume, sentiment, high yield spreads, and other key variables. These will be the pieces to the puzzle that give us some indication that junk bonds have turned the corner. Rather than getting overly bearish at this juncture, I’m viewing the sell off as a long-term tactical opportunity. The key is knowing how this sector fits within the context of your diversified income portfolio and sizing your exposure correctly to your risk tolerance . My plan is to purchase an income-generating asset class at attractive levels relative to other bond alternatives. That’s likely a contrarian view right now, but in 2016 it may look quite different. For now, I’m keeping my powder dry and my eyes open. I suggest that other serious income investors do the same and consider scaling into any new positions slowly over time. This will allow you the flexibility to size your holdings appropriately and use time or price to your advantage.