Author Archives: Scalper1

Apple iPhone sales concerns now pushing into June quarter

In recent weeks, Wall Street analysts have cut their iPhone sales targets for the March quarter on signs of slowing production in Asia. Now those concerns are bleeding into the June quarter. Cowen analyst Timothy Arcuri on Tuesday cut his price target on Apple (AAPL) stock to 130 from 135 on a weaker outlook for the iPhone maker. He rates the stock as market perform. Apple stock was flat, near 107, in afternoon trading on the stock market today.

Are Spain ETFs In Trouble Post Indecisive Election?

Thanks to several monetary easing policies, Europe has performed remarkably well this year with a marked recovery in the Eurozone. However, concerns have started to build up in the region following an inconclusive election in Spain. This has raised fears of a prolonged political uncertainty much like Greece and Portugal. Election Results and Outcome Election in Spain ended up with no clear winner. While the ruling Popular Party led by PM Mariano Rajoy won the majority of votes, it fell short of the 176 seats needed for a parliamentary majority. The party acquired only 122 seats out of the 350-seat parliament, suggesting that it has to collaborate with the Socialist party, who won 91 seats, or newcomers Podemos and Ciudadanos, who secured 69 and 40 seats, respectively, to form a coalition government. A political gridlock might be in the cards for weeks or months until a new government is formed. Additionally, it will lead to new obstacles in continued implementation of austerity and reform measures due to a mismatch of opinions and views. This is because Rajoy has pushed for harder budgetary policies and wide-ranging economic reforms like spending cuts and tax increases to avoid the fate of Greece, which had to be bailed out a number of times. But Podemos and the Socialist party, led by Pedro Sanchez, have campaigned against these anti-austerity measures. Though Spain’s economy has grown over the past one year, GDP is still below its pre-crisis level and unemployment over 20%. Moreover, the fourth largest economy in the Eurozone will struggle to form a stable government and might put an end to the historic 33-year two-party dominance. This will weigh on investor and consumer sentiment in the coming months, suggesting a strong negative shift in the outlook towards Spain, so much so the country could be another threat to Eurozone’s growth heading into 2016. Market Impact Following the election last weekend, Spanish stocks, as represented by the IBEX 35 index, declined 3.6% on Monday, marking the biggest one-day drop since late August. Meanwhile, the country’s 10-year bond yield rose 0.11% to 1.79%. This reflects that investors are turning bearish on the country given the fears of political uncertainty. As such, the ultra-popular ETF targeting Spain – the iShares MSCI Spain Capped ETF (NYSEARCA: EWP ) – was the worst performer in the European space on the day losing 3.7% at the close. Another fund -the iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Spain ETF (NYSEARCA: HEWP ) – is also down 3%. EWP in Focus The fund tracks the MSCI Spain 25/50 index and is home to a small basket of 25 stocks. It is heavily concentrated in the top firm – Banco Santander (NYSE: SAN ) – at 15.2% followed by Telefonica (NYSE: TEF ) and Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (NYSE: BBVA ) with at least 9% share each. Financials takes the top spot at 40% in terms of sector holdings, followed by 16% exposure each in industrials and utilities. The product has AUM of nearly $1.4 billion and trades in solid volume of 1.4 million shares per day. It charges 48 bps in fees per year from investors. HEWP in Focus This product seeks to provide exposure to the Spanish stock market without the currency risk. It follows the MSCI Spain 25/50 100% Hedged to USD Index and is basically a holding of EWP with currency hedge tacked on. The fund is unpopular and illiquid with AUM of $71.8 million and average daily volume of 19,000 shares. It charges 51 bps in fees per year from investors. Bottom Line Spain ETFs could be a risky investment going into the New Year as political uncertainty might stretch far longer than expected pushing the country into deep trouble. Original Post

Rate Hike Leads To Bond Funds’ Biggest Withdrawals: 3 Funds To Sell

Time and again we at the Zacks Mutual Fund Commentary section warned investors about the possibility of bond fund exodus once the U.S. Federal Reserve pulls the trigger on rate hike. This turned out to be true last week when bond mutual funds and exchange-traded funds saw a record wave of withdrawals. Bond market funds saw the largest redemptions since 1992, when Lipper started tracking the flows. Remember, a low interest rate environment is favorable for investments in bond funds. This stems from the fact that the market value of a bond is inversely proportional to interest rates. Thus, the rush to pull out money from bond funds was pretty obvious. The U.S. corporate bond market is particularly at risk, as the central bank’s rate hike will lead to significantly higher borrowing costs for the lowest-rated companies. Corporate bond prices have also seen significant volatility, as investors find trading in and out of big positions next to impossible without affecting their prices. The Exodus from Bond Markets Apprehensions over the stability of the bond market compelled investors to pull out $15.4 billion from taxable bond funds for the week ending Dec 16. High-yield junk bond funds saw an outflow of $3.8 billion during the week. This was the largest outflow since Aug 2014. Another record wave of redemptions left investment-grade bond funds lose out $5.1 billion. This was the biggest outflow since Lipper started recording data in 1992. Alongside, yields on investment grade and junk bonds shot up to their highest level since 2012, according to data from Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Tom Roseen, head of research services for Lipper, said: “They were getting out of the way of the Fed.” He also acknowledged the recent closure of bond mutual funds and picked on the Third Avenue fund. He commented: “People are focused on the Third Avenue fund taking it on the chin.” New York-based Third Avenue Management had announced that it was closing the high-yield bond mutual fund Third Avenue Focused Credit Fund (MUTF: TFCVX ), but its investors will not get their money for “up to a year or more.” The move to block redemptions from a Stone Lion credit fund was also playing on investors’ minds. According to Morningstar data, high-yield bond funds were the biggest losers over the last one week among other Taxable Bond Funds. The high-yield bond funds lost 3.5% in the one-week period and its year-to-date loss is now at 4.8%. Corporate bond funds lost 0.5% over the one-week period and the year-to-date loss stands at 1.2%. Corporate Bond Funds in Trouble According to UBS, an astounding $1 trillion of U.S. corporate bonds and loans that are rated below investment grade may be in danger. A UBS strategist commented: “It is our humble belief that the consensus at the Fed does not fully understand the magnitude of the problems in corporate credit markets and the unintended consequences of their policy actions.” According to Bank of America Merrill Lynch indices, price of U.S. company debts rated “CCC” had dropped to the lowest level since 2013. Subsequently, the average yield soared to a six-year high. Meanwhile, Moody’s noted that the list of companies rated B3 or lower with a negative outlook increased 5% in November to 239. This was a 37% year-on-year increase. What Increases the Risk for Bond Funds? A rise in rates may lead to bond exodus; consequently, the lack of liquidity may compel investors to sell the asset class at a significant discount. There is a growing concern that a massive exit from bonds may freeze the markets, as the number of sellers may not match the number of buyers. Redemption of bonds would increase the sell-off and fund managers would then have to sell the less liquid assets to match investors’ cash demands. However, if a mutual fund or an ETF holds illiquid bonds, the price swings will be rapid and would create a vicious cycle as price drops will again intensify selling pressure. The liquidity risk is of high concern. For bonds, sovereign government bonds are said to be the most liquid. On the other hand, corporate bonds are to suffer the most. New regulations and capital requirements have compelled Wall Street banks to cut their inventories. This has made the buy-and-sell activity of corporate bonds in the secondary market more difficult. The drop in inventories following fresh regulations has created a gap in the number of buyers and sellers. Thus, bond fund managers are now less prone to holding a large chunk of bonds in fear of any possible rout. The Securities and Exchange Commission had proposed a rule earlier this year that mutual fund companies must disclose how vulnerable their bond portfolios are to rate hikes. This was among SEC’s first moves to address concerns that the first rate hike in about seven years may spark a rapid sell-off in bond funds, resulting in steep losses. 3 High-Yield Bond Funds to Avoid Increasing concerns over bond funds will only intensify as the central bank opts for a gradual hike in rates. Thus, investors looking for safer avenues should exit from certain high-risk high-yield bond mutual funds. Below we highlight 3 mutual funds from the High Yield bond fund category that carry a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #4 (Sell) or Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #5 (Strong Sell), as we expect the funds to underperform their peers in the future. Remember, the goal of the Zacks Mutual Fund Rank is to guide investors to identify potential winners and losers. Unlike most of the fund-rating systems, the Zacks Mutual Fund Rank is not just focused on past performance, but the likely future success of the fund. These funds have negative returns year-to-date and over the last 1-year period. The 3-year annualized return is also in the red. The minimum initial investment is within $5000. Northeast Investors Trust (MUTF: NTHEX ) focuses on investing in marketable securities of prominent firms. NTHEX primarily purchases debt securities rated below investment grade by any of the two major ratings firms. Northeast Investors Trust currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #5. Over year-to-date and 1-year periods, NTHEX has lost 17.8% and 17.7%, respectively, and has a negative 3-year annualized return of 4.2%. Annual expense ratio of 1.09% is higher than the category average of 1.06%. NTHEX’s 85.59% of assets is allocated to bonds. Franklin High Income A (MUTF: FHAIX ) invests mostly in lower-rated debt securities that provide high yield. These lower-rated securities include bonds, debentures, convertible securities and other debt securities. The fund seeks a high level of current income. Franklin High Income A currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #5. Over year-to-date and 1-year periods, FHAIX has lost 11.8% and 10.9%, respectively, and has a negative 3-year annualized return of 1.9%. Annual expense ratio of 0.76% is lower than the category average of 1.06%. Consulting Group High Yield Investments (MUTF: THYUX ) seeks a high level of current income by investing in below investment grade debt securities. THYUX focuses on investing most of its assets in domestic junk bonds. THYUX may utilize 20% of its assets to purchase high yield bonds of issuers located in emerging or developed economies. Average portfolio duration of THYUX is from two to six years. Consulting Group High Yield Investments currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #4. Over year-to-date and 1-year periods, THYUX has lost 8.4% and 7.6%, respectively, and has a negative 3-year annualized return of 0.4%. Annual expense ratio of 0.74% is lower than the category average of 1.06%. Original post