Tag Archives: mutual funds

Q2 2016 Style Ratings For ETFs And Mutual Funds

At the beginning of the second quarter of 2016, only the Large Cap Value and Large Cap Blend styles earn an Attractive-or-better rating. Our style ratings are based on the aggregation of our fund ratings for every ETF and mutual fund in each style. Investors looking for style funds that hold quality stocks should look no further than the Large Cap Value and Large Cap Blend styles. These styles house the most Attractive-or-better rated funds. Figures 4 through 7 provide more details. The primary driver behind an Attractive fund rating is good portfolio management , or good stock picking, with low total annual costs . Attractive-or-better ratings do not always correlate with Attractive-or-better total annual costs. This fact underscores that (1) cheap funds can dupe investors and (2) investors should invest only in funds with good stocks and low fees. See Figures 4 through 13 for a detailed breakdown of ratings distributions by style. Figure 1: Ratings For All Investment Styles Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings To earn an Attractive-or-better Predictive Rating, an ETF or mutual fund must have high-quality holdings and low costs. Only the top 30% of all ETFs and mutual funds earn our Attractive or better rating. Absolute Shares WBI Tactical LCV Shares (NYSEARCA: WBIF ) is the top rated Large Cap Value fund. It gets our Very Attractive rating by allocating over 34% of its value to Attractive-or-better-rated stocks. Ameriprise Financial (NYSE: AMP ) is one of our favorite stocks held by WBIF and earns a Very Attractive rating. Over the past decade, Ameriprise has grown after-tax profit ( NOPAT ) by 8% compounded annually. The company has improved its return on invested capital ( ROIC ) from -2% in 2008 to 11% in 2015. Similarly, the company has increased its NOPAT margin from 11% in 2005 to 14% in 2015. Across all facets, Ameriprise is improving business fundamentals, yet the stock remains undervalued. At its current price of $99/share, AMP has a price-to-economic book value ( PEBV ) ratio of 1.1. This ratio means that the market expects Ameriprise to grow NOPAT by only 10% over its remaining corporate life. If AMP can grow NOPAT by just 6% compounded annually for the next decade , the stock is worth $132/share today – a 33% upside. ProFunds Mid-Cap Value ProFund (MUTF: MLPSX ) is the worst rated Small Cap Value fund. It gets our Very Dangerous rating by allocating over 37% of its value to Dangerous-or-worse-rated stocks. Making matters worse, total annual costs are a whopping 6.72%. New York Community Bancorp (NYSE: NYCB ) is one of our least favorite stocks held by MLPSX and earns a Dangerous rating. Over the past decade, New York Community Bancorp’s NOPAT has declined from -$294 million to -$80 million. Over the same time period, the company’s ROIC declined from 8% to a bottom-quintile -1%, while its NOPAT margins fell from 43% in 2005 to -13% in 2015. Worst of all, the stock has not followed this decline in operating performance and is significantly overvalued. In order to justify its current price of $15/share, NYCB must immediately achieve positive pre-tax margins of 18% (from -21% in 2015) and grow revenue by 31% compounded annually for the next 13 years . In this scenario, NYCB would be generating over $20 billion in revenue 13 years from now, which is equal to Aflac’s (NYSE: AFL ) revenue in the last fiscal year. It’s clear the expectations baked into NYCB are overly optimistic. Figure 2 shows the distribution of our Predictive Ratings for all investment style ETFs and mutual funds. Figure 2: Distribution of ETFs & Mutual Funds (Assets and Count) by Predictive Rating Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 3 offers additional details on the quality of the investment style funds. Note that the average total annual cost of Very Dangerous funds is almost four times that of Very Attractive funds. Figure 3: Predictive Rating Distribution Stats Click to enlarge * Avg TAC = Weighted Average Total Annual Costs Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings This table shows that only the best of the best funds get our Very Attractive Rating: they must hold good stocks AND have low costs. Investors deserve to have the best of both and we are here to give it to them. Ratings by Investment Style Figure 4 presents a mapping of Very Attractive funds by investment style. The chart shows the number of Very Attractive funds in each investment style and the percentage of assets in each style allocated to funds that are rated Very Attractive. Figure 4: Very Attractive ETFs & Mutual Funds by Investment Style Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 5 presents the data charted in Figure 4 Figure 5: Very Attractive ETFs & Mutual Funds by Investment Style Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 6 presents a mapping of Attractive funds by investment style. The chart shows the number of Attractive funds in each style and the percentage of assets allocated to Attractive-rated funds in each style. Figure 6: Attractive ETFs & Mutual Funds by Investment Style Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 7 presents the data charted in Figure 6. Figure 7: Attractive ETFs & Mutual Funds by Investment Style Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 8 presents a mapping of Neutral funds by investment style. The chart shows the number of Neutral funds in each investment style and the percentage of assets allocated to Neutral-rated funds in each style. Figure 8: Neutral ETFs & Mutual Funds by Investment Style Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 9 presents the data charted in Figure 8. Figure 9: Neutral ETFs & Mutual Funds by Investment Style Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 10 presents a mapping of Dangerous funds by fund style. The chart shows the number of Dangerous funds in each investment style and the percentage of assets allocated to Dangerous-rated funds in each style. The landscape of style ETFs and mutual funds is littered with Dangerous funds. Investors in Small Cap Value funds have put over 34% of their assets in Dangerous-rated funds. Figure 10: Dangerous ETFs & Mutual Funds by Investment Style Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 11 presents the data charted in Figure 10. Figure 11: Dangerous ETFs & Mutual Funds by Investment Style Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 12 presents a mapping of Very Dangerous funds by fund style. The chart shows the number of Very Dangerous funds in each investment style and the percentage of assets in each style allocated to funds that are rated Very Dangerous. Figure 12: Very Dangerous ETFs & Mutual Funds by Investment Style Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 13 presents the data charted in Figure 12. Figure 13: Very Dangerous ETFs & Mutual Funds by Investment Style Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings D isclosure: David Trainer and Kyle Guske II receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, sector or theme. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Junk Bond ETF ANGL Soaring: Will Its Flight Last?

Heightened volatility is driving investors to safe havens, making 2016 the year of the bond market. While long-term bonds are the undisputed winners, the high yield corner has drawn attention over the past three-months on investors’ drive for higher yields and a rebound in oil price. In addition, high-yield spreads have tightened significantly from 8.64 on February 12 to 6.36 currently, as per the BofA Merrill Lynch US High Yield Option-Adjusted Spread , making junk bonds attractive. This suggests that investors are now demanding lower premium than comparable Treasury bonds to compensate for the risk. However, the risk of default is on the rise, dampening the appeal for junk bonds. This is because the resumption of the slide in commodity prices and renewed global growth concerns are weighing on companies’ profits and balance sheets yet again. As per Moody’s Investors Service, global junk bond defaults will accelerate to 5% by the end of November, up from the previous forecast of 4.6% one month ago, and 3.8% in March. Fitch Ratings expects high yield bond defaults to climb to 6% this year from 4.5% last year and touch the highest level since 2000 (read: Junk versus Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETFs ). Given the heightened credit risk and low rate environment, investors thronged the high yield quality fund – VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: ANGL ) . The fund gained 12.3% in the year-to-date time frame, outperforming the broad bond fund (NYSEARCA: BND ) and junk bond fund (NYSEARCA: JNK ) by wide margins. ANGL in Focus This ETF seeks to track the performance of the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index, which focuses on the ‘fallen angel’ bonds. Fallen angel bonds are high yield securities that were once investment grade but have fallen from grace and are now trading as junk bonds. This unique approach gives the portfolio 248 securities that are widely spread across them, with none holding more than 1.65% of assets. The fund has an effective duration of 5.67 years and year to maturity of 9.33. Additionally, the product mainly comprises BB and B rated corporates, which together make up for 85.3% of the asset base. Bonds from energy and material sectors occupy the top two positions with 25.2% and 22.1%, respectively, while financial and communications round off the top four with double-digit allocation (read: all the High Yield Bond ETFs here ). ANGL has amassed $158.7 million in its asset base while trades in moderate volume of 82,000 shares a day on average. It charges a relatively low fee of 40 bps per year from investors and yields 5.20% per annum. Behind The Success of ANGL The fallen angels strategy is immensely successful this year as the number of fallen angels has increased substantially on a series of debt downgrades among energy and material firms – the top two sectors of the ETF. In this regard, Moody’s snatched investment grade ratings from 51 companies and gave them the junk status at the end of the first quarter, up from eight in the fourth quarter and 45 for the whole of 2015. These downgrades have boosted the performance of the ETF as bond price generally rebounds after losing an investment grade rating. Additionally, the rebound in oil prices from the 12-year low reached in mid-February injects further strength into these bonds and the ETF. As a result, fallen angels bonds tend to have lower default rates than their more traditional junk bond counterparts, thus offering better risk-reward profiles. These have a history of outperformance in nine out of the last 12 calendar years, according to Market Vectors. Moreover, the outperformance of ANGL was spurred by its higher average credit quality as about three-fourths of the portfolio carry the upper end rating (BB) of the junk category, leaving just less than 4% to the risky CCC-rated and lower. Link to the original post on Zacks.com

Homebuilder ETFs To Buy On Upbeat Data

After being stalled in the first quarter, the housing market started to show signs of a spring rebound. This is especially true given that new home construction and building permits rebounded in April, indicating that the U.S. economy is again gaining steam (read: Are Housing ETFs Ready to Ride on Spring Selling Season? ). U.S. housing starts climbed 6.6% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.17 million homes and much higher than the Reuters expectation of 1.13 million. The uptick in construction activity was broad-based with increases of 3.3% in single-family houses, and 10.7% in multi-family houses, including apartments and condominiums. Meanwhile, new applications for building permits, a construction bellwether for the coming months, rose 3.6% to an annual rate of 1.12 million after declining for three months. The data released early this week showed that homebuilder confidence remained unchanged for the fourth consecutive month in May as indicated by the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo sentiment index. Builders’ outlook for sales over the next six months jumped to the highest level since December. This reflects that the housing market is still strengthening, though the pace of growth has slowed down (read: 5 Sector ETFs to Play Now ). This is because historically low interest rates and ongoing job creation will continue to fuel growth in a recovering homebuilding sector, creating a buying opportunity in homebuilders and housing-related stocks. In addition, slower and gradual rate hikes will not impede the growth prospect of the sector, at least in the near term. Given this, investors might want to look at the three homebuilder ETFs – the iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (NYSEARCA: ITB ) , the SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (NYSEARCA: XHB ) and the PowerShares Dynamic Building & Construction Portfolio ETF (NYSEARCA: PKB ) – for their exposure to the sector. These funds have a solid Zacks ETF Rank of 2 or ‘Buy’ rating, suggesting some outperformance in the months to come. Further, the residential and commercial building industry has a solid Zacks Rank in the top 34%. While the upbeat data failed to garner interest in the sector this week, investors could start piling up these products in their portfolio, especially if the upcoming home sales report due to release on May 24 also shows strength. In particular, PKB is outperforming with gains of 5.8% so far in the year while ITB and XHB have shed 2.5% and 3.5%, respectively. Investors seeking large profits in a short span could also take a look at the leveraged plays – the ProShares Ultra Homebuilders & Supplies ETF (NYSEARCA: HBU ) and the Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3x Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: NAIL ) . HBU provides double exposure while NAIL offers triple exposure to the index of ITB. However, the fund is relatively new in the space and has low trading activity, making it a riskier and a high-cost choice. Link to the original post on Zacks.com